As long as it doesn’t end up like a mafia war, with unseen hands guiding puppets to do the dirty stuff, all the while lurking to pounce when the quarry is weakened and isolated ... if Anselm lives to his majority, it would be a small miracle!
That's part of the interesting aftermath of Arthur's reign. He had his thumb down for so long, it's taking the Lords a little while to wake up and realize they have some power again.I find that many wait right now. Who will tire of waiting first, I wonder?
She sure doesn't and now she doesn't have Arthur to protect her. That said, she handles her own fairly well this time.Maud never seems to ultimately catch a break with her vassals.
That's why I thought it would interesting to have these few multiple views before the narrative ended so you can sort of be in their head space as the epilogue starts. In truth, even Nicholas of Wessex, Duke of Norfolk has a mild claim if others don't pan out. The only trouble with a female as heir is the France part. They still don't want a woman as monarch.This does feel so... War of the Roses-esque. At least in set-up. Eadgar in a John of Gaunt role, though like his comparison, may not actually wish the throne. He could get another crown, he says (Ireland = Castile?) Or if he does, will be wary at making plays, just because everyone is watching him because they expect him to be a potential usurper. But close enough to the king that his line could still be problematic in the future.
Likewise, Matilda is actually the closest to the throne, meaning she and any of her descendants are closer than Eadgar. Of course in the last chapter, I believe Bedford mentioned "male" line as a claim, which is what Henry IV used to claim his crown over the other Plantagenet cadet branches. That was always dubious, given the family gained both Anjou and England through claims from women, but in both cases, neither Ermengarde nor Matilda/Maud technically ruled. (The latter is for some debate of course)
But it's arguably even more dubious here, since this England has seen multiple queens! And long ruled queens! Which, strikes me as very good reason for Maud to be quite worried about Matilda's well-being. You simply can't bypass her. She'd have to be killed, and soon, before she has any children, or it becomes much, much harder to place anyone other than her family on the throne. It would have to be open rebellion, on an extremely flimsy claim.
Still, on a bookend note, it would be kind of funny to have the story end with either Anslem or Matilda being crowned in Scotland, if for no other reason than that's where it all began with Eadgar... all those centuries before.
Eadgar would have to try and steal the crown of Ireland as Anselm holds it along with the thrones of England, Wales and France (and hopefully soon Scotland.)I think edgar is going to struggle to stay out of the potlcial storm here, since everyone either wants him on their side or wont believe he will sit it out. Maybe becoming king of Ireland is actually a good idea. Would increase his neutrality and prestige for himself, be seen as a distancing and disinterest in the imperial seat and actually would help the empire in long term whatever happens.
Let's just say that Anselm's reign is quite interesting. I could easily have written an entire new book on it but feared I might start getting repetitive from the previous ones.As long as it doesn’t end up like a mafia war, with unseen hands guiding puppets to do the dirty stuff, all the while lurking to pounce when the quarry is weakened and isolated ... if Anselm lives to his majority, it would be a small miracle!
It is a heavy crown that you wear, to be certain. Yet you are the rightful King
Nice!but be bold
The big question. We’ll see it in general terms - if he’s given the time and power to dream it and try to fulfil it.So what is your dream?”
Thank you and indeed, yes, you will see what that dream ends up being.Yes, what is his dream? I guess we'll be told by the history book chapters you promised us coming.
But this is the end of the saga's narrative parts. And what a ride it has been! What a pleasure to follow from start to finish! Thank you so much @coz1 !
Yes, I had to do that with the earlier works. Maybe a little hokey, but I liked it. As for how long Anselm gets a chance to do for himself, wait no further as the 1st section of the epilogue is coming right up.So the the narrative portion finally comes to an end. Still looking forward to the historical epilogue to see how things turned out. Congratulations on making it over such a long time and at such a high rate of quality output.
Nice!
The big question. We’ll see it in general terms - if he’s given the time and power to dream it and try to fulfil it.
Indeed true and part of the reason I set the scene in the crypts of Thetford. Lot of history there and while some of it was good, quite a lot was not.What a poisonous heritage, is all I could think as they spoke.
The new ruler never gets an easy time, no doubt. It matters not how secure the throne is. However, Anselm has some help.As ever, finding what the new ruler is going to do after the old one dies is an issue. If Anslem keeps things going however, I see no reason why the empire wont stick around for ages.
Then again, france is such a strong yet weak area within the empire that anything could happen in game.
You're very welcome and thank you for reading along and giving comment!Thank you coz1, for taking us on that journey.
You've got a pretty good idea of where things are likely to head. Those are indeed all remaining goals for me as player. The next 100 years remain plenty interesting, but Anselm's reign especially was fun.And so it ends with a dream, who's circumstance, in some way, mirrors his predecessor. That's both in scene, - we were introduced to a child Arthur as well, but also in the recurring king who wasn't supposed to be king (or Emperor) in this case. In that he certainly shares that many of the Wessex kings we've journeyed with - certainly Eadgar, Eadward... though not Uthraed. Of course, they aren't descended from Uthraed...
Should Anslem survive, and you have indicated he will, I'd imagine he'd lock down the British Isles and probably continue to push the HRE out of default France, as well as working to change the inheritance laws in France to primogeniture. And I don't really see any reason he wouldn't be successful. Money and power aren't too hard to come by, usually, at this stage of the game.
In any case, it is truly an accomplishment to write this much on one family/story, @coz1 and I applaud you. Thank you for your time, your efforts and your work with the Wessex clan. It was a great read, and an inspiration.
Hmm, does the historical record indicate whether that was considered to be through natural causes, misadventure or even <dramatic pause> foul play?another threat was ended in 1353 when none other than Duke Eadgar was found dead at only 28
I’m sure it was only ever business, not personal - and best not to ask him about his business. He did it all for the Family.While his actions behind the scenes might be considered suspect, this was no strange idea from what is known of the historical House of Wessex.
Nicholas was definitely stabilizing, but indeed - now Anselm is on his own.A very nice write-up - it sounds like Nicholas was about as honourable as any scion of Wessex could be, but his death means the young Anselm now stands effectively alone - all his triumphs and his tragedies shall be resolutely his own.
There is a lot more to go through here, but true - there is an underlying thing which will be dealt with eventually.You master the history book genre as well as the narrative genre, my good man. It is a delight to read, and I read between the lines not all is well, even though Anselm turns out to be a success it seems.
I never thought about it, but Nicholas could easily be based on Michael Corleone were I to write it out narratively. One that never thought it would fall into his lap, but he took to it obviously well.Hmm, does the historical record indicate whether that was considered to be through natural causes, misadventure or even <dramatic pause> foul play?
I’m sure it was only ever business, not personal - and best not to ask him about his business. He did it all for the Family.
Indeed, Nicholas did. I suggested it in the narrative portion and attributed it to him here that the deaths of the Dukes of Normandy and Bourbon were murders. That is of a piece with what I've done with the rest of these men (and women) of Wessex. Just made sense.I strongly suspect Duke Nick had to do some extreme things to keep the empire together. Better perhaps that it is lost to history and just to honour his memory for what it was.
Solid enough foundations for a reign I suppose. Religious strife everywhere might be a problem though, especially in HRE. Especially as we know in hindsight that it never really goes away and will get worse with time
Indeed, Anselm didn't have really great stats but that did not stop him. There were a lot of other capable people around that assisted and given the numbers/resources at his disposal, he was able to crawl through. You may be astonished at how well he does so.Anslem has some real Richard II quality when it comes to those stats (though perhaps not personality traits). Obviously, he goes on to great things, which speaks to the power of good advisors (or one specifically, at the keyboard).
Eadgar departing at age 28? I'd imagine that stabilized things. Coincidence? While the young Arthur would likely be a greater long-term threat, he also likely wouldn't be an issue until after Anslem has established his power base.