One war, two wars... And clearly the first lasted four around four years. Must have been a hard fought one, I wager. And this lad, which lad...hmmmmm? 
We’ve had these leaps several times. Slowly we’re getting there, but I’m sure there’s much to tell about the years inbetween first.That was a large leap forward in the story. Is it permanent, or will there be flashbacks to the intervening period? If not, then I suppose not too much of importance must have happened other than the war being won. And I trust Arthur did not personally lose any battles.![]()
Hope so, but you never know ...We’ve had these leaps several times. Slowly we’re getting there, but I’m sure there’s much to tell about the years inbetween first.![]()
We know Arthur has little else on his mind but fight the HRE and we know he still has some time left to do so, even if he starts to feel the pressure. I can't yet say how it goes, but the Emperor does not tend to lose (in battle at least.) As for the lad...I purposely left that vague.One war, two wars... And clearly the first lasted four around four years. Must have been a hard fought one, I wager. And this lad, which lad...hmmmmm?![]()
I truly enjoyed writing that scene between Arthur and Ava. I miss her as a character precisely because of what you mention. She was good at what she did and was beneficial to Arthur's ultimate goal even if Arthur did not see it. Rather the irony of his taking her head way back when. It's part of why she has never left him because you're right. In some respects, he gets it now. Far too late, but...I always maintained that Ava and Arthur were, in many respects, made for each other - and that whilst Ava was ever her own person Arthur had the greater responsibility. A little give on his part ... well, "bad" as Arthur has been for the realm's neighbours, on those rare moments they operated as a team they were downright terrifying to any who opposed them. Again, some hint here that Arthur, on some level, knows this.
But the shade is right: it some respects he too is now a shrunken thing.
Not a leap as much as the story starting to converge between the now and the future (or past, if you will.) The later portions have always been from 1351 and we are pretty close to that. I specifically wanted to introduce the young Letitia that has been a character for some time, even if sparingly.That was a large leap forward in the story. Is it permanent, or will there be flashbacks to the intervening period? If not, then I suppose not too much of importance must have happened other than the war being won. And I trust Arthur did not personally lose any battles.
He will carry some nagging ambivalence about Ava to the grave - and it will be a fiery meeting afterwards!
We’ve had these leaps several times. Slowly we’re getting there, but I’m sure there’s much to tell about the years inbetween first.![]()
Indeed, I tell all about what happens between now and 1351. And it's a lot!Hope so, but you never know ...![]()
True in a direct sense - though there seems to be lethal threat in the third person for young Arthur!Now pleasant to have a familial conversation not so underlaced with lethal threat. It is important to remember there are some - perhaps even many - that regard the Emperor with a great deal of affection.
There is that and a good read. I obviously cannot say what happens but I am already foreshadowing something.If not fate takes care of him before that. I mean, Arthur has a thing with fate and heirs.![]()
This Nicholas is an important character for a number of reasons. Of course, he is the living reminder of Arthur's old friend and cousin. And he's the one person that he's actually taken care of over the years. He will play into the next years which is why I keep him as a character and indeed, theirs is one relationship that seems fit. THat may not always last (and could have gone sideways here.)Now pleasant to have a familial conversation not so underlaced with lethal threat. It is important to remember there are some - perhaps even many - that regard the Emperor with a great deal of affection.
Little Nico has indeed given good advice to both Arthur and his now deceased son. However, we pretty much know that Arthur won't listen to anyone but himself.Nicholas' words are really true, and I hope Arthur really listened to them (it seems so, but with him you never know). It is not the first time (if I'm not mistaken) the former give good advice.
It's a pretty big war with some surprises along the way. We know he wins (from the beginning scenes) but it's how we get there that is interesting. As for the threat, I hesitated including that. I can explain later, but it means something but maybe not what is expected.True in a direct sense - though there seems to be lethal threat in the third person for young Arthur!
There are going to be some big battles here ... but Britain has the interior lines in France. The numbers from England will be welcome, but presumably the German heartland will be providing the same. My money would be on Arthur here of course - even without the flash-forwards.![]()
I am indeed being vague and hopefully for good reason. As for Emma, I think you answer that perfectly. She was already disgusted just before she died and to see what has happened since? Yes...Arthur's memory of her is not quite reality as far as her opinion of him.Uh oh. He is going that route, isn't he. May he not be discovered. Or perhaps he is so well entrenched he will cope well even if discovered. Of course, all this is based on me not being sent off track by your excellent done vagueness, sir.
As for Em, Arthur would never admit it, but I think she'd be disgusted with him and what he has become.
Obviously I still cannot say, but some very good points made above. It was crucial for one man to inherit the whole and while Emperor Arthur having more heirs would not change that as the heirs of Arthur 2.0 would, it gets too sticky for the kind of power the Emperor ultimately enjoys. He may protest and say that there are others (as many others do) but between them all, you are right - Arthur 2.5 is definitely the best gamble. Yet...I am not being shy with my foreshadowing.I can't help but feel as though Arthur 2.5's days are numbered. But I don't think Old Arthur's ordering an assassination at the end.
Murdering kin outright is just a bridge too far for even his rationalizations. And since Arthur had held on to a dream of Wessex holding the whole of the Isles (Scotland) there remains no better candidate to make that happen than Arthur 2.5. (And while Arthur claims other rationale, the lack of an heir who gets the Kingdom of Scotland as well is probably the real reason he never tried for more heirs)
Yes long-term, Anselm would be better but he's too young and Arthur can't count on living long enough groom him properly. Half-done is better than completely raw.
But Arthur 2.5's already beaten and destroyed. He's convinced he has no real allies, no real friends. His power feels fleeting. He's at his end.
So, while I don't think Arthur's plan is to off his grandson, I do think whatever his plan is will ultimately result in Arthur 2.5's end. And it will drive another cleaver through Arthur's relations, and at this point, he's kind of run out of people to blame besides himself. (Maybe Maud, I guess?)
*Countdown to where Arthur is actually planning to off his grandson and I've managed to somehow give him too much credit.*
One more reason I decided to write this final book on Wessex. I liked how the lands were slowly gathered and continually added to, but there was this final question. Who would be there to pass it off to? I (or others) have suggested in the past that I wanted to turn the Arthurian legend on its head, and in a way I have. This kingdom will last far better than the historically written Arthur, but in truth, they both end up in many of the same places. I have to admit that I don't write so much in themes as I do relationships, but if there is a theme to this whole work it is that age old problem...call it absolute power corrupts absolutely or you've conquered the world but never yourself. In the end, Arthur is left disappointed even with all that he has gained. To the rest of the world, that doesn't matter. But as I hope I've detailed, it certainly matters to Arthur even if he remains with blinders on to see it.Mm. Rotten is the house of wessex. This is the sort of thing that leads to several splits in a widening family and civil war in two centuries. Then again, there might not be an empire then. There certainly doesn't seem to be a replacement emperor available now.
Often the heirs in ckii are in a state of can't do shit until you take them over and start using their stars properly. So using that in universe makes sense, if a bit cruel because a 30 age heir can become a 60 age great conqueror fairly easily. But everyone, including the prince himself, seems determined that this shall not come to pass.
I'm still fairly mellow towards old Arthur though. The only thing you can really question of him was his decision to maintain his lands in England and France when he inherited them. That therefore required becoming an empire, lots of war, some tough love with vassals and gutting his familial relations down to those who wouldn't get in the way. I think outside of personal relations with family and lovers, he's done an astounding job of empire consolidating and building. The only thing outsiders contemporary to him would fault with his reign was the loss of his heir and even then, it was in battle and so perfectly alright way to go. I suspect his personal prestige is pretty high in Europe, even in Rome and the hre (direct competitors). He's turned england from a slowly developing regional power constantly at risk of civil war to the greatest power in Europe. And unlike the HRE which conceivably could be beaten conventionally, to defeat Britannia you not only have to defeat a huge French army commanded by very good generals but build a fleet and invade england too. At this time, no one looks like they could try that let alone win.
So we come back to the heir, cos it's really the only threat to the empires existence right now.
Careful now.The House of Wessex won its throne through murder, and the stain of that has infected them ever since.
There is no depth that the Emperor is afraid to plumb, no crime too heinous. The young Arthur was outmatched from the start. He should of killed his grandfather with a dagger to the heart whilst the latter was ill.
And what will Maud make of this subtle work?
It is meant to be ominous as is the end to the next few scenes. You are not wrong. Arthur years ago decided that what mattered was not familial happiness or any sort of love except for him as ruler. He is indeed capable of anything. Yet will he go across this bridge too? As I said above...I left it vague for a reason.That was an ominous ending and can be interpreted many ways and most of those ways are not favorable for the Prince. I have come to the conclusion Arthur will do anything he feels he needs to do no matter who it hurts or the ultimate consequences.