• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.

unmerged(177)

Raphael
May 23, 2000
143
0
Visit site
I've been reading with great pleasure this forum for months now, as I'm an old player of the boardgame Europa Universalis. As you can imagine, I'm really impatient to have the computer version. Thank to all those who write on the forum and the AAR's. Reading it is the only thing that can make me wait.

Because I'm an old player of the BG, I've modified many rules and datas. Even if the initial boardgame was an impressive amount of knowledges, with time, I found a few historical mistakes. As much as I've seen on this site, most of these mistakes have been corrected.
Can someone tell me if all have been corrected ? If not, is it still possible ? I know the testing is advanced and many things can't be changed now. But historical accuracy is so important to all wargamers that I think it can be useful to correct even minor details. I must also say that I'm not an historian, so I can have made mistakes. Excuse me if I did, and I hope students or historians that read it will correct me. Thank you in advance.

1/Gelderland : in 1492, Duchy of Gelderland was independant and was only annexed to Nederland in 1543 by Charles V. On the map, Gelderland correspond approximately to the Holland province.
The province called The Hague could have been named Holland for more accuracy. The province called Friesen represent also independant countries, Duchy of Friesen and possession of the bishop of Utrecht. In the BG, all the Nederland was said to be part of Spain, but it wasn't at all. North-eastern provinces were independant and western and southern Nederland were part of Habsburg not Spain.
Could you tell me if there is a possibility in the game for Habsburgs not to unite with Spain. Because in 1492, the union of these crowns were not on the way. Engagements between the children of Maximilian and infants of Spain (those who conducted to union under their son Charles V) were only celebrated in 1495. In fact, the negotiations with Spain about the weddings began in 1491. But can you imagine the way european history would have gone if Habsburgs would not have reigned over Spain ? And in 1492 it was possible.

2/Raguse : in 1492 Raguse wasn't anymore under sovereignty of Venice, as the BG says. I'm not sure if it was under Hungary rule or independant yet. I think the first. And it became independant in the first years of the XVIth. Then it accept protection of the Turks for the duration of the game.

3/Georgia : as much as I know, Georgia was independant in 1492. The BG says it was under Persia rule. Can somebody who knows this country tell me ?

4/Roussillon, Franche-Comté and Artois: these 3 provinces were annexed by Louis XI of France at the treaty of Arras in 1482 and belongs to France at the beginning of the game in 1492. The BG makes them all spanish.
But when Charles VIII of France began to claim for Napoly, he decided to calm Empire and Spain. So he sold back Artois and Franche-Comté to the Habsburgs and Roussillon to Aragon in 1493. But imagine Charles VIII would not have claimed for Napoli ? Or of he had given something else to his enemies to calm them down ?

5/In 1492, there were many independants bishoprics in Europe, particularly in the Empire. The BG ignores them.
I decided to make new countries and new rules fot these very special countries (no offensive war, no armies, possibility of financial support to crusade or Pope, etc, even a special rule about election of the Holy Roman Empire).
The most important ones represent nearly whole provinces in the game : Salzburg (under protectorate of Habsburgs but not annexed), Liège/Luik (boundaries of the bishopric of Luik is close to those of the province Hainaut on the map, even if the name should be changed of course), Munster, Köln, Mainz.

6/Anspach : in 1492, most of this province (north of Bayern) belonged to Pfalz. The BG says it belonged to Bayern.

7/Kaffa : the province of Kaffa (southern Crimea) belonged to Turks, not, as BG says, to Khan of Crimea.

8/Götland : belonged to Denmark, not Sweden in 1492.

9/Ireland : in 1492, only the province of Dublin (Pale) was really under control of England. The suzerainty was only nominal on the rest of Ireland. The BG made it all english.

10/Istria : most of the country called Istria on the map was dominated by Hungary in 1492.The BG says it belonged to Venice but only a little piece of it did.

That's all folks. I hope it wasn't boring for you to read all these details. Hope also there wasn't too much mistakes in it. Thank for those who will answer me and sorry for my english.
 

Doomdark

Design Director
Paradox Staff
61 Badges
Apr 3, 2000
5.434
11.328
  • Sword of the Stars II
  • Leviathan: Warships
  • Magicka
  • Majesty 2
  • Majesty 2 Collection
  • March of the Eagles
  • Naval War: Arctic Circle
  • Victoria: Revolutions
  • Rome Gold
  • Semper Fi
  • Sengoku
  • Ship Simulator Extremes
  • Sword of the Stars
  • Knights of Pen and Paper +1 Edition
  • Supreme Ruler 2020
  • Starvoid
  • Teleglitch: Die More Edition
  • The Showdown Effect
  • Victoria 2
  • Victoria 2: A House Divided
  • Victoria 2: Heart of Darkness
  • Rome: Vae Victis
  • Warlock: Master of the Arcane
  • Warlock 2: The Exiled
  • War of the Roses
  • Prison Architect
  • Europa Universalis III
  • Arsenal of Democracy
  • Cities in Motion
  • Cities in Motion 2
  • Crusader Kings II
  • Crusader Kings II: Legacy of Rome
  • Crusader Kings II: The Old Gods
  • Crusader Kings II: The Republic
  • Crusader Kings II: Sons of Abraham
  • Crusader Kings II: Sunset Invasion
  • Crusader Kings II: Sword of Islam
  • Darkest Hour
  • Dungeonland
  • A Game of Dwarves
  • Divine Wind
  • Europa Universalis IV
  • Europa Universalis IV: Conquest of Paradise
  • For The Glory
  • For the Motherland
  • Gettysburg
  • Hearts of Iron III
  • Hearts of Iron III: Their Finest Hour
  • Heir to the Throne
  • Impire
I agree with you 100% that details are important, Raphael.

8/Götland : belonged to Denmark, not Sweden in 1492.

Gotland does belong to Denmark in 1492 in the CG, so that problem is corrected. (Note that Gotland (not Götland) is an island in the Baltic Sea. Do not confuse it with the Swedish counties Västergötland and Östergötland. FYI, some scholars are of the opinion that the fearsome Goths (Visigoths and Ostrogoths) originated in these areas, which would explain the similarity of names.)

I don't know much about your other corrections, but I will seize this opportunity to reiterate some of my own: :)

1) The isle of Bornholm should rather be considered a part of Skåne than of Eastern Pommerania.

2) Lake Onega is far too large and important to be missing from the map.

3) Sweden was not a Danish vassal state in 1492, although there was a strong unionist sentiment among the Swedish nobles.

4) The inclusion of the Hanseatic League as a nation means the loss of four important historical states: Holstein, Mecklenburg, Bremen and Pommerania. The Hansa was a merchant league which employed mercenary forces when it had need of armies. It had no interest in conquest but occassionally fought to protect its interests in the Baltic trade. In 1492, it had already passed its prime and would eventually dissolve into nothing but a couple of free city states. I would have chosen to include the Duchies instead.

5) For the sake of historical accuracy, I would split off northern Österbotten and call it Eastern Lappland. (It would be even more accurate to join these two halves of Lappland into one huge province, but then you could never get the modern borders in the game.)

The first three of my proposed corrections should be very simple to implement since they are purely cosmetical in nature. ;)

/Doomie
 

unmerged(177)

Raphael
May 23, 2000
143
0
Visit site
Thank you Doomie for the answer about Gotland. And I'm entirely with you for the other corrections you propose.
About the union of Kalmar and the particular status of Sweden, I think the problem is that the game doesn't simulate personal union (same problem with the union of crowns of Spain and Austria I talk about earlier, or with personal union between Saxony and Poland, etc). I would like to militate for a more complex simulation of the personal relations between all the sovereigns in Europe. Because I think that, even if EU has got an interesting approach, this problem is so central in the diplomacy and wars that it has to be better simulated and in a less abstract way. Maybe with a kind of genealogical tree, or something. I know it must certainly be to late for this implementation, and probably very complex to simulate : so for the next version EU II, I hope developers would like to make it. That would be so great.
 

Doomdark

Design Director
Paradox Staff
61 Badges
Apr 3, 2000
5.434
11.328
  • Sword of the Stars II
  • Leviathan: Warships
  • Magicka
  • Majesty 2
  • Majesty 2 Collection
  • March of the Eagles
  • Naval War: Arctic Circle
  • Victoria: Revolutions
  • Rome Gold
  • Semper Fi
  • Sengoku
  • Ship Simulator Extremes
  • Sword of the Stars
  • Knights of Pen and Paper +1 Edition
  • Supreme Ruler 2020
  • Starvoid
  • Teleglitch: Die More Edition
  • The Showdown Effect
  • Victoria 2
  • Victoria 2: A House Divided
  • Victoria 2: Heart of Darkness
  • Rome: Vae Victis
  • Warlock: Master of the Arcane
  • Warlock 2: The Exiled
  • War of the Roses
  • Prison Architect
  • Europa Universalis III
  • Arsenal of Democracy
  • Cities in Motion
  • Cities in Motion 2
  • Crusader Kings II
  • Crusader Kings II: Legacy of Rome
  • Crusader Kings II: The Old Gods
  • Crusader Kings II: The Republic
  • Crusader Kings II: Sons of Abraham
  • Crusader Kings II: Sunset Invasion
  • Crusader Kings II: Sword of Islam
  • Darkest Hour
  • Dungeonland
  • A Game of Dwarves
  • Divine Wind
  • Europa Universalis IV
  • Europa Universalis IV: Conquest of Paradise
  • For The Glory
  • For the Motherland
  • Gettysburg
  • Hearts of Iron III
  • Hearts of Iron III: Their Finest Hour
  • Heir to the Throne
  • Impire
Indeed. I think that there is an unofficial but widely used expansion to the BG called Bloodlines which simulates dynastic relations.

There has been quite a lot of discussion in this forum about a more complex diplomacy model, and although I would like that very much, I think the present system will suffice. EU deserves a sequel however, and I am sure that the dev team already has lots of ideas for EU 2. :)

You mention the Union of Kalmar, but you should be aware that the union only consisted of Denmark and Norway in 1492. Sweden did not accept the Danish king until 1497, when the Danes invaded with the blessing of several high Swedish nobles.

/Doomie
 

unmerged(177)

Raphael
May 23, 2000
143
0
Visit site
Really, Doomie ? You can't know how much pleasure you give me with this information about bloodlines. I was breaking my head trying to find a way to simulate it on the BG.

I've never heard about this expansion. Please, could you tell me where I can find it, either buy it or download it or find informations (whatever). You would be very nice, and I think many people reading this forum would like to hear more about this expansion. Thanks in advance.

And thank you for your precisions about the Union of Kalmar, I'm such an ignorant about Scandinavian History.
 

Doomdark

Design Director
Paradox Staff
61 Badges
Apr 3, 2000
5.434
11.328
  • Sword of the Stars II
  • Leviathan: Warships
  • Magicka
  • Majesty 2
  • Majesty 2 Collection
  • March of the Eagles
  • Naval War: Arctic Circle
  • Victoria: Revolutions
  • Rome Gold
  • Semper Fi
  • Sengoku
  • Ship Simulator Extremes
  • Sword of the Stars
  • Knights of Pen and Paper +1 Edition
  • Supreme Ruler 2020
  • Starvoid
  • Teleglitch: Die More Edition
  • The Showdown Effect
  • Victoria 2
  • Victoria 2: A House Divided
  • Victoria 2: Heart of Darkness
  • Rome: Vae Victis
  • Warlock: Master of the Arcane
  • Warlock 2: The Exiled
  • War of the Roses
  • Prison Architect
  • Europa Universalis III
  • Arsenal of Democracy
  • Cities in Motion
  • Cities in Motion 2
  • Crusader Kings II
  • Crusader Kings II: Legacy of Rome
  • Crusader Kings II: The Old Gods
  • Crusader Kings II: The Republic
  • Crusader Kings II: Sons of Abraham
  • Crusader Kings II: Sunset Invasion
  • Crusader Kings II: Sword of Islam
  • Darkest Hour
  • Dungeonland
  • A Game of Dwarves
  • Divine Wind
  • Europa Universalis IV
  • Europa Universalis IV: Conquest of Paradise
  • For The Glory
  • For the Motherland
  • Gettysburg
  • Hearts of Iron III
  • Hearts of Iron III: Their Finest Hour
  • Heir to the Throne
  • Impire
Please, could you tell me where I can find it, either buy it or download it or find informations

Unfortunately, I don't remember where I read about it. It might have been on alt.games.wargames, rec.games.board or some French web-page. Info about this game is incredibly hard to come by on the net.

You could also join the mailing list:

address: list-request@feednet.com
subject: 'subscribe eu-list'

My own interest in the boardgame is cursory. I have read about it only to understand the CG better. :)

/Doomie
 

JCQUARTO

Recruit
28 Badges
May 27, 2000
9
0
Visit site
  • Crusader Kings II
  • Europa Universalis IV
  • Crusader Kings III
  • Imperator: Rome
  • Crusader Kings II: Holy Fury
  • Cities: Skylines - Parklife
  • Cities: Skylines - Parklife Pre-Order
  • Crusader Kings II: Jade Dragon
  • Crusader Kings II: Monks and Mystics
  • Europa Universalis IV: Rights of Man
  • Crusader Kings II: Reapers Due
  • Stellaris
  • Crusader Kings II: Conclave
  • Crusader Kings II: Horse Lords
  • Europa Universalis IV: Common Sense
  • Crusader Kings II: Way of Life
  • Cities: Skylines
  • Cities: Skylines Deluxe Edition
  • Europa Universalis IV: Art of War
  • Crusader Kings II: Sword of Islam
  • Crusader Kings II: Sunset Invasion
  • Crusader Kings II: Sons of Abraham
  • Crusader Kings II: The Republic
  • Crusader Kings II: Rajas of India
  • Crusader Kings II: The Old Gods
  • Crusader Kings II: Legacy of Rome
  • Crusader Kings II: Charlemagne
  • Cities in Motion
Really, Doomie ? You can't know how much pleasure you give me with this information about bloodlines. I was breaking my head trying to find a way to simulate it on the BG.

I've never heard about this expansion. Please, could you tell me where I can find it, either buy it or download it or find informations (whatever).

=============
Hello, I'm the author of the Bloodlines variant expansion rules for EU (well, the Boardgame EU that is!). They are a unofficial expansion I wrote about 2 years ago; Philippe Thibaut wrote me one time that he wanted to include them as part of new work on EU but I do not know if that ever occured.

Anyway I am happy to share them with you if you want to email me privately.

Also, the other information about the EU mailing list (again, the Boardgame EU), is slightly incorrect. It is no longer at Feednet.com (and I took down the searchable databases there for Leaders etc) at that time. The new list is at eu-list@egroups.com or you can sign up at egroups.com web site.
 

unmerged(161)

Second Lieutenant
Apr 25, 2000
151
0
Visit site
A bit later than i wnated to, but here is the dutch view on this issue :)

The Duchy of Gelre, as Gelderland was called in dutch, wasn't part of the domain that Philips the Handsome, the later Philips I of Spain, would inherit in 1493. It had been for a while, but not anymore since 1477. It would indeed be Charles V who would add it to 'the netherlands' IN cultural terms, it was very much part of the netherlands though!

the Province of the Hague should indeed be Called Holland. This is really something that would look weird to any Dutchman

The Duchy of Friesland, as it is called in dutch was aso independent, and was really independent from Holland, even culturally.

The Bishophric area of Utrecht, was under control of Philips the handsome ( or rather maximilian of habsburg, who held the lands for him till 1493.)

In fact, the areas you mention under control of the habsburgs, where under control of the habsburgs in 1492, but not anymore in 1493! Holland was then returned to Philips the Handsome, who actually was the heir to the Burgundian lands...however, the burgundian lands where long gone, and he was left with the netherlands and some small areas in france. IN 1493, it looked very much that the Netherlands would be an independent nation....until everybody and its cousin died in spain, and throught he marriage with joan the mad, Philips the Handsome eventually became King of Spain.....IF you look at it from what he controled first, the netherlands weren't controlled by the spanish King, but spain was controlled by their ruler.....

IN the 15th century the Burgundian rulers did much to develop the Dutch national sentiment. OF crucial factor was to centralize the law in Holland In Gent. That was the highest court int he netherlands, and even the courts in Burgundy couldn't overrule it. The Burgundian Kings saw the Netherlands as an independent nation already, and If Philpis the one whouldn't ahve inherited Spain., the Nation of the Netherlands would have been formed in 1493, and not a century later, ( or more, depending if yousee the start of the end of the war as dutch independence)

Indeed it should be possible, i think, in 1492 to have The netherlands as an independent nation......It was in 1492 BY FAR, the most realistic option.

Marc, the Dutch guy
 

unmerged(177)

Raphael
May 23, 2000
143
0
Visit site
Hi Marc

Very impressive works and some revelations I guess for everybody here.

I'm going to examine the hypothesis of making Holland independant in 1492 for my next BG game (but without Friesen if I understand well - well, maybe I won't have to worry about that, because the most important part of the province called Friesen on the map was in fact part of bishopric of Utrecht, so under the same rule as the rest of Holland). I think the only way to deal with this complex dynastic situation is to have dynastic rules.

About the problem of culture (for example the difference between Gelderland and Friesen), I don't think this can be handled in the game by any means, and I don't know if this would have very big importance in political terms, as diplomacy was indifferent to national identity and culture differences until the end of the XVIIIth. I mean for the case of the two provinces mentionned above there is no difference in game terms between them.

Once again, thanks for your research.

Raf
 

unmerged(177)

Raphael
May 23, 2000
143
0
Visit site
Very nice of you to propose it to me, Jason

Can you tell me how often these PBEM are organized ? Because in fact, I'm now working very hard on writing new rules to improve the game to my taste (I never did before on my previous games). And I would like to finish it before beginning a new game (of course, I would translate them and propose other players to take whichever rule they want). And also I'm just finishing one game right now (a few turns from arrival).

Thank you again

Raf