Tell him that you hate him, God and yourself and then send your problem to the church.
ButterflyComposer, you're a genius!
(The plan was simple...)
Tell him that you hate him, God and yourself and then send your problem to the church.
ButterflyComposer, you're a genius!
(The plan was simple...)
Sending him to the Church would work... except that he has a wife. Doesn't that disqualify him from the Church?
There is no doubt that this history is anglocentric. It has to be. I will not fault you for using the Pratchet offense but know that I am no great fan. Excellent idea for Eadward but the practicability is lacking, as you suggest below.I'm using the terry pratchet offence of spewing out every single conceivably viable plot point and possibility in the expectation that by doing so they won't happen, unless I tempted fate. France falling or France staying together...one of the two is going to happen and to be frank unless you want to attack France yourself it doesn't matter which one does happen, because the only part of the realm that can be threatened either way is Normandy. I wish they'd do something after all this time but then again Scotland hasn't done anything either. In most European histories, it's easy to accuse the author of being aglocentric but here the universe really is as such. No one else can move before england sorts out their civil war!
Tell him that you hate him, God and yourself and then send your problem to the church. Remarkable how many ambitious needy second sons in my fame have been shut up by giving them a robe and telling them to look Holy.
I must admit, I do not get the reference. That does not happen with me a lot. But I will not deny that Butterfly is a genius.ButterflyComposer, you're a genius!
(The plan was simple...)
I am so pleased that the scene worked as intended. I wanted to show Eadward as having some savvy. It was a quandary as I began writing it and thank goodness it played well.I did like the reverse psychology Eadward used on Robert - sounding him out, finding he does not plan to go on Crusade, complimenting him and telling him the King wants him to stay in Normandy - and seeing Robert reverse himself and decide to go. Well played.
Sending him to the Church would work... except that he has a wife. Doesn't that disqualify him from the Church?
Poor Æthelmær is trying to do his duty. Harassed? Yes.Æthelmær comes across as a diligent - and harrassed - lord. I pity him.
I hate to say it...but wait and see.Good artists create. Great artists steal.
It would so long as she is alive I think. Thankfully (since we are using a particular kind of strategy here), they both live in the palace with Eadgar. Wait till she pops out an heir and then have her die 'due to complications'. Then you can stuff the grieving husband in the Church and ensure his child grows up loving you not him.
Or, if you don't want to be nefarious (and considering the track record of marriages with eadgar's sons and friends), that all might happen by accident/unaided. Btw, I've never seen so much childbirth death before. Is this a base game thing?
Sooo much money! That was really the big aim of the post. I did not make a big deal of it in the writing but I made sure it was included in the screenies. Mel Brooks suggested that it is good to be the King. It is also costly.So much money. All gone. Hopefully the gift is well received and the treasury back in the black before unfortunate things happen.
There is no doubt that this history is anglocentric. It has to be.
I must admit, I do not get the reference. That does not happen with me a lot. But I will not deny that Butterfly is a genius.![]()
I hate to say it...but wait and see.![]()
I would just like to say to you lot...if you ever have those types of thoughts...please consider me an avenue to discuss. Send me a PM or email. I may not tell you what you wish to hear but I would do all in my might to convince you that suicide is not an option. I do not make an issue because it is personal, but my reasoning is this...we did not put ourselves in this world so it is not our place to take us out.
“The Franks are in shambles,” Eadward tried to explain, “Her manner of taking the throne has them all in quite an uproar as I understand it.”
I will certainly give proper fb-fb later but this may need to be addressed now.Pfft. Any SJW can take that and run you into the ground. You think that just because the entire AAR is about the kingdom of England that it has to be so anglosentric?
Take a walk through classical Crusader King I forums sometime. There's some crackers on there's. Knud Knitling especially.
Yeah I know. Which is why I was surprised you didn't recall the catchphrase which is repeated almost every chapter including the first one.I will certainly give proper fb-fb later but this may need to be addressed now.
Yes to the first and second, not only have I taken a walk through classic CK, but I lived there. You might notice that one of the completed works in my signature was written in that place. As I was a moderator on this forum back when that game was thriving, I am fairly well educated on those works as I had chance (and need) to peek at all of them. Especially phargle's grand opus. Still, the reference escapes me.![]()
I wasn't going to say anything - but on reflection I should say something. It won't be news to some people - but perhaps some people who read this won't know.Yesterday I found out that a high school friend committed suicide. I was not close to her then or now in any great way, but I remember her because she was damn cute. I would just like to say to you lot...if you ever have those types of thoughts...please consider me an avenue to discuss. Send me a PM or email. I may not tell you what you wish to hear but I would do all in my might to convince you that suicide is not an option. I do not make an issue because it is personal, but my reasoning is this...we did not put ourselves in this world so it is not our place to take us out.
Sorry I've been a bit absent but, well, life and all that. I also live close to Manchester Arena so this last 10 days have been somewhat traumatic and very busy for those in my profession and others (luckily no one I'm close to died but like many I know people caught up in it, have provided counselling and sadly know of one of the victims).
I'm not sure I agree with @TheButterflyComposer's suggestion of an expansion into France. Things are yet too shakey at home and better to secure your own borders surely? Not only that but I'm presuming you have no de Jure claims there either.
Oh I don't know. Seems quite in keeping if you take the view that England is the best place on Earth. Why would you want to conquer some chilly Welsh hillside when civil war means you can campaign in the comfort of familiar surroundingsThere is something to be said about a bunch of Anglo-Saxon feudal lords who are capable of fighting quite bloody civil wars with each other but are apparently so peacefully that they never attack anyone else. Someone needs to kick them into action (and towards lands they can actually hold, not the holy land).
Oh I don't know. Seems quite in keeping if you take the view that England is the best place on Earth. Why would you want to conquer some chilly Welsh hillside when civil war means you can campaign in the comfort of familiar surroundings![]()
Actually I think I disagree - except in cases of expanding realms by bashing heathens lords mostly competed within realms during this period throughout Latin Christendom. The exceptions that proves the rule is really the Normans, both in England and in Sicily, and yet even both of those can be seen to be justified on religious grounds. Note I am talking about the lords of the realm - not the ambitions of the Kings. And yet even there, most inter-kingdom disputes were dynastic rather than territorial.Yeah but at least in this period, it's good only in comparison to Scandinavia. And yes perhaps the rest of the British isles. But in that case, why the heck would you not want to invade France? Even the northern coast?