Good man.And I'll host 43 if nobody's put one up by Sunday night.
of people who have played more than five games, which, though narrow,
We really need to get Seamus to play another game so we can stop doing this.
You can stop doing it now.
I've given Falc the win for 43.
What do you mean?
As in, I've awarded him a win for 43, even though he was a sub.
The only other time I can remember a sub in resistance was game 29, when Cliges couldn't carry on GMing, so I took over for the last couple of rounds, and GÜG replaced me, but since he didn't even vote on all the teams I didn't award him the win for it.
Game 44 is here. Finally trying my hand at Avalon.
Speaking of which, I've already got a question: How do I know what roles to add? Purely up to me? Surely there's some meta rules. More players = more roles?
Oh and, is there any rule against advertising this in the OT?
Up to you, really. Number of players sort of dictates things; if you've got 9 players, for instance, I think you definitely want Mordred to counterbalance the advantage the goodies have, while 7 makes me prefer to add things that help the Resistance a bit (like Oberon). I also like having as many roles as possible, but that may just be me.
I'd offer to run 45 but I'm going to Hull in three days and I'm not entirely sure they have internet there.