-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
My bad, I haven't been feeling well for the past few days. I totally spaced this, I am sorry for everyone whose playing.
Madchemist's team of Cilges, Aedan, Npstr and himself was approved unanimously.
The Mission failed and was sabotaged once, the score is not Spies - 2, Resistance - 0
Tamius played his Keeping a Close Eye on You on Madchemist
@Falc is the first leader of mission 3
Unfortunate result, but the card use does indicate Madchemist is an extremely unlikely spy. Only way I could see it is if both Tamius and MC were spies, which remains unlikely. Not yet ready to give an opinion between npstr and Cliges as to which is the more likely spy.
Hahaha, yeah, yeah.
You and MC appear on two failed teams, and the obvious answer is that you couldn't possibly be a spy.
Well I know I'm not a spy, and for MC to be a spy, he either A) did not sabotage the team, despite being on the previously sabotaged team and being the proposer for this team, thus making him the chosen sabotager by standards, or B) Tamius and MC are both spies. A is ludicrous, so it can be dismissed. B is possible, as I previously stated, but not likely.
Is MC at all to be trusted by Tamius "forgot to use the card" and his revelation?
There's a lot fishiness in both of these missions.
When the game draws to an end, anyone genuionely thinking I'm a spy at this point is going to kick himself for easily dismissing the obvious here: 2/3rd of the first failing team goes on this mission with one of those purportedly cleared by the fellow whose card conveniently slipped his mind on that same first round.
It's hard to take Tamius' post for real with his history.
I'm doing a spreadsheet right now, I plan to share it and my take on the situation when it's done (hopefully tonight).
I'm doing a spreadsheet right now, I plan to share it and my take on the situation when it's done (hopefully tonight).
Which would have been far more helpful for everyone to know last mission.
Your telling the truth is noted, FWIW, but it doesn't give me any confidence in you even still.
I'm surprised that you've concluded this, since you already "know" that at least one of tamius and myself needs to be a spy, and were entertaining the possibility of both of us being spies not all that long ago.
Useless on both counts.
I was going to disregard tamius's card use as more or less irrelevant information pretty much whatever happened with it. In my mind, Tamius and aedan both being spies has vastly risen in likelihood.
I think if Tamius and you were both spies, the better result would be for Tamius to "clear" someone else, or to accuse you. Only one of you would need to get on the next team, so putting you at odds would be more likely to convince people that one of you was a resistance member. A spy member trying to "clear" a fellow spy member would be more likely to backfire. And even when I mentioned the possibility of both being spies, it was not a possibility I considered particularly likely. Even besides that, one of the three possibilities from mission 1 (Tamius is sole spy, Madchemist is sole spy, both are spies), has been eliminated, which confirms to me that Tamius is a spy.