Seriously? I happily offer myself to be scanned by someone you know to be resistance, and argue with Falc when he opposes that, and you still refuse to trust me? I don't need to be on a team for us to win, but this is getting absurd with how much you people are absolutely refusing to trust me when there is no clear reason to distrust me over Falc and Panzer. Sure "there are more possibilities", but 10 possibilities that have a 1% chance each are worth less than a single possibility with a 90% chance.
Yes, clearly I should trust you blindly, because you've never, ever managed to fool anyone in this game before, and Resistance members are clearly immune to giving confusing advice.
Look, I explained why tamius checking Aedan was less than optimal. If tamius says Aedan's a spy, then the ONLY thing we know for certain is that Aedan's a spy. The rest remains uncertain. If tamius says Aedan is resistance, we end up with 3 cleared people and the 6 others perfectly split between two possible spy teams.
I don't know about you all, but neither of those seemed useful. We don't need to put Aedan on any mission anyway and the other option would be a coin toss.
No, assuming tamius confirmed aedan was a spy, the only things everyone would have known is that aedan is a spy, Falc couldn't have sabotaged mission 1, De Chat and I couldn't have sabotaged mission 2, making tamius and Hazbot the only 2 possibilities for active Mission 2 spies, etc, etc... Then we would have had things such as basic logic (i.e., barkades' voting record) to work through who to trust.