Give it to someone from the first mission, that way we will have 3 probable resistance to build a team around
The points about Deathbywombat and Madchemist are pretty much the exact same thing I said in my post. You are the obvious likely spy for approving the sabotaged team, but like I said, that's far from the only explanation.Mind elaborating on why I'm the most likely spy? I was more inclined to think Wombat or Madchemist, rejecting the team to try to gain some goodie points. Out of those two, I'm leaning towards Wombat, since Madchemist would know that rejecting the team wouldn't go too far towards making him look good, while Wombat might be overestimating its value.
It's possible. However incompetent he is, I don't think he'd screw up telling us what the GM tells him. If someone other than myself were to be the one opened up to, it'd be him.As for who to Open Up to... I'm not real sure. Ironhide, maybe? I think he's the only one of us right now who isn't tied in some way to suspicious activities (either being on a sabotaged team or making suspicious approvals).
Mind elaborating on why I'm the most likely spy? I was more inclined to think Wombat or Madchemist, rejecting the team to try to gain some goodie points. Out of those two, I'm leaning towards Wombat, since Madchemist would know that rejecting the team wouldn't go too far towards making him look good, while Wombat might be overestimating its value.
As for who to Open Up to... I'm not real sure. Ironhide, maybe? I think he's the only one of us right now who isn't tied in some way to suspicious activities (either being on a sabotaged team or making suspicious approvals).
We shouldn't do anything until Ironhead's "In the Spotlight card" is resolved. (#133, in SMALL BLUE print, right side of screen.)
In the Spotlight should have a public result. Sometimes it's handled by having player publically state their mission card.Aedan777 approved the mission.
EDIT: Actually, that is exactly what the GM told me by PM -- "approved". But I think the word he should have used is "support" or "sabotage." And in any case, the In The Spotlight results should be public, not a private message to me, right? GM, can you clarify?
I believe that the scenario in which the cardplayer receives the result privately is KACEOY. The difference between that card and ITS is (a) I couldn't play it privately and hope to catch the target unawares -- I had to announce it publicly, which gives the target time to change their mission order; and (b) we all find out the player's mission order publicly.I didn't really think about the terminology, but I'm OK with switching. And I thought the player I provided it too was supposed to be the one who says it publicly
Alright, I'm taking this as an admission of guilt. 1/4 spies confirmed.Approve