You should be building the trust chain people. My team really should've been approved.
Reject.
Reject.
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Aedan has vouched for Alxeu, and Alxeu has vouched for Al-Aziz.
Therefore, we should put Al-Aziz and Alxeu on the team and pick two other people who will both be Kept A Close Eye On.
Who those two are isn't relevant, except it shouldn't be Aedan or Madchemist. We already have information on them, we can sort them out by elimination.
So yeah, Snoop's team would have fitted that bill, but so does this one. And since we can't guarantee any team's success, I really don't see why this one is getting so much negativity, compared to the previous one.
APPROVE
Therefore, we should put Al-Aziz and Alxeu on the team and pick two other people who will both be Kept A Close Eye On.
Who those two are isn't relevant, except it shouldn't be Aedan or Madchemist. We already have information on them, we can sort them out by elimination.
So yeah, Snoop's team would have fitted that bill, but so does this one. And since we can't guarantee any team's success, I really don't see why this one is getting so much negativity, compared to the previous one.
APPROVE
There's someone else you should be KACEOIYKWIM
What does that mean I wonder..? :mellow:
If he means what I think he means, he needs another 'Y' between the 'O' and the 'I'.
Nope, it's "someone you should be keeping a close eye on" not "someone you should be keeping a close eye on you"
Either way, it's just RP fluff, don't mind it
Only Xarkan yet to vote
The team(Azi/Kai/Alx/Fal) was rejected 5-5:
Yay: Kai - Fal - Alx - Azi - Xar
Nay: Aed - Tam - Mad - Dex - Sno
Next up. Dex. 4 people. 4th proposal. 3rd team.
Yay: Kai - Fal - Alx - Azi - Xar
Nay: Aed - Tam - Mad - Dex - Sno
Next up. Dex. 4 people. 4th proposal. 3rd team.
Okay, so you disagree with my analysis? Guess I'll have to assume you're a spy.
Why madchemist?
I need a team approved, and a sabotage, so that I can post some triangles - I've made them (not recommended for a 10-player game) but we still have far too many possibilities.
I don't want MC on the team as per Falc's analysis.
Reject unless changed
Although wasn't there something about three failed teams meaning a loss?
Reject unless changed
Although wasn't there something about three failed teams meaning a loss?
No proposal has yet been made(it is Dexander's turn).
3 failed missions mean a loss. 5 rejected teams mean a loss. 3 rejected teams are alright, though.
3 failed missions mean a loss. 5 rejected teams mean a loss. 3 rejected teams are alright, though.
Madchem is definitely the less likely spy than Aedan. Just looking at their banter since the mission tells us that, and we want to add as many trustworthy player as possible. 2 randoms with an eye on them tells us almost nothing new, aside from being more likely to fail than a team with madchem.
Why do you think madchemist is so likely to be cleared? He's opposed any team that doesn't have himself on it, because that would mean someone else on his spy team would have to sabotage instead. If a spy can sabotage 2 teams by themselves with this set-up then the game's pretty much over. Putting madchemist on a team is guaranteeing a lose for the resistance. But I'm starting to think you aren't a resistance member.