-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
OK, now I'm getting really paranoid.
Aziz, please check tamius. If he's OK, then fine, I agree that this mission should go. Just in case he's not, I'm rejecting this, just in case a spy decided not to sabotage because he was under observation, foolish though that would be.
I know I can't change my vote after hearing the result, but if tamius is good then there should be enough other players to approve this mission regardless of my rejection.
Reject
Aziz, please check tamius. If he's OK, then fine, I agree that this mission should go. Just in case he's not, I'm rejecting this, just in case a spy decided not to sabotage because he was under observation, foolish though that would be.
I know I can't change my vote after hearing the result, but if tamius is good then there should be enough other players to approve this mission regardless of my rejection.
Reject
Guys... either I read the description wrong or the card reveals my role to the player I give it to. This is fairly useless because you already know my role. Is this true or am I reading badly?
Here:
The player chosen by the Leader (Tamius chose me) will have his [her] Role revealed by the GM through PM to the player that he [she] chose (whoever I give the card to).
Here:
The player chosen by the Leader (Tamius chose me) will have his [her] Role revealed by the GM through PM to the player that he [she] chose (whoever I give the card to).
Yeah, that's how that card works. Well, it's a screw-up, but I wouldn't think much of it. Mixing up cards happens a fair bit, and victory is all but assured anyways. No reason a spy last mission wouldn't sabotage, so even if Tamius is a spy, he can't cause this mission to fail on his own.
Patchnotes for the 1.4 patch:
MAJOR:
-Reworded card rules so they are no longer sexist
-Reworded card rules so they are no longer sexist
Ooh. CK2 did a role-playing dlc. I've been wishing for one of those since it came out. Might return to it now.
Also, since tammy just made a booboo there, can't he change his mind who gets the card now?
Approve.
Also, since tammy just made a booboo there, can't he change his mind who gets the card now?
Approve.
Misread the card. Thanks Panzer.
I'm not really sure who to give the card to - although I'd like to have it, I can't give a card to myself. Kaiser? Snoop? madchemist? aedan?
I'm not really sure who to give the card to - although I'd like to have it, I can't give a card to myself. Kaiser? Snoop? madchemist? aedan?
Doesn't matter, but they should then give the card to al-aziz. That's all that really matters. I'd suggest not myself or madchemist, since it's pretty obvious which of us is the spy. (In case anyone feels like being clever- I mean madchemist)
I'm a fine choice. Snoop would also be an interesting one; I want to know if he's just trying to curry favor with me or if he is genuinely good. I really hope it's the latter.
Either way, aedan is right, and whoever gets it should reveal to Aziz.
We sure agree with each other a lot for two people who are virtually assured to be on opposite sides.
You have no reason to stop dispensing good advice just because you're a spy. You'd look even worse if I was the one who did it all.
I have no reason to stop dispensing good advice just because I'm a spy. I'd look even worse if you were the one who did it all.
*Fixed
Last edited:
It would be just like a spy to insert a hideous error in the use of the subjunctive into one of my posts.
aedan is a spy. :unsure: No, I don't know why he would tell me.
Also it was pretty amusing because the rules sounded like they'd been badly translated from German. "The fishwife, he was petting the tomcat. She was a pretty tomcat with the speckled coat..."
Approve
Also it was pretty amusing because the rules sounded like they'd been badly translated from German. "The fishwife, he was petting the tomcat. She was a pretty tomcat with the speckled coat..."
Approve