Oh no no no no no! Lex retro non agit! I was forced to face error event and had to give up 800 for some years, which was enough I think. Beside we agreed in game to give me money back. I'm not going to again pay for someone mistakes ;p
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
What exactly was the mistake here? The event is supposed to give you a choice between paying 800D and losing some mil DPS. Tough is what I'd say. It's cheaper than the cost of the drill instructor, which I believe is worth paying for, and I was willing to pay for it two sessions ago. So far I've taken like three of those events. They are WAD. Though it was clearly a waste of time if we're just going to edit out the effects every time somebody gets an event they don't like.
EDIT: Maybe it should give you a decision between losing mil techs and eco techs instead of offering to take your money away? Or at least have, say, -1 central and something else as a third option(unless you're at 0 central, but then I'll have to make extra events).
EDIT: Maybe it should give you a decision between losing mil techs and eco techs instead of offering to take your money away? Or at least have, say, -1 central and something else as a third option(unless you're at 0 central, but then I'll have to make extra events).
i prefer the concept of loosing investment in a eco tech or mil tech over loosing sliders to keep another tbh
also i havent had a single drill instructer so feel free to send me some
That might be a good way to go. Something that completely nerfed your monarch would also work.
There was a typo in the event. Instead of giving you -1 in Quality and Offensive, it reset them both to zero. That's what HAL said it did, at least. I fixed the typo though.
As i said 2 weeks ago, i probably wont be able to be there most of the session. Dont mind ghosting me if i'm still sleeping when session beggins, and i'll probably not play more than 5-10 years.
Going to be better in the next weeks.
Going to be better in the next weeks.
Well such is life, with these crazy battles I never feel safe on open plains with loads of snow.
Well, seeing the stats, I feel the Romans will probably get their asses handed to them by Egypt pretty soon. Why anyone would ever let their army go down to 30k when their neighbour has 300k remains a question. Oh, and has a 1/1/1 monarch while the other has a 9/9/9. Oh, and after having conducted three wars upon the other, and broken a NAP.
On the other hand, I bet you could have gotten drake to help you vs TC if you'd been a bit pre-emptive about it.
Yeah, that's generally why martin never survives the whole game: he never does any diplomacy.
As for my pitifully small army? I screwed up fighting martin, sending my armies in piecemeal instead of all at once, so they got killed off one after another and forcing me to rebuild again and again. But hey, 3.6 inflation (soon to be 2.6).
As for my pitifully small army? I screwed up fighting martin, sending my armies in piecemeal instead of all at once, so they got killed off one after another and forcing me to rebuild again and again. But hey, 3.6 inflation (soon to be 2.6).
Can someone tell me why Moors is doing so extremely well, besides me playing it ofcourse. Iberian is not that rich, and even thou i have the "traditional" spanish area of Incas, i don't own Azteq which Spain would normally do. Did i just managed to pick the rigth religion or what made me become this far ehead in income and tech. Yeah i know this is painting a target on myself, but i really don't understand how i managed this well, while other larger european nations have far less income, while holding wastly more European provinses.
Rubbing in your success? I would say it has a lot to do with your war record. You've enjoyed the fruits of peace for many years, whilst everyone else has had prolonged periods of war. Not that I resent this. I think you've done well, and the Moors position as the outsider adds an interesting dynamic to the game right now. I've also appreciated it as a country you've probably been most likely to go to war with at various times.
.
only reason id help martin is to fuck byz over, i have no love for crimea since georgia got annexed
that sayd tc pilot could surrender in advance
Last edited:
there is nothing special about moors succes, dont think your a good player cause you can build a economy while stayng atpeace forever (xept for that little gang you pulled last session)
you only fought 1war entire game and only your fleet saw any action tho even that is hardly worth mensioning since it was 3vs1 on that scene so i hardly stood a change
you only fought 1war entire game and only your fleet saw any action tho even that is hardly worth mensioning since it was 3vs1 on that scene so i hardly stood a change
I think the sole reason for your current economical advantage (because that's what you got, not army or navy-wise) is that you managed to stay at peace for long enough in the beginning to secure 6 refineries. They gave you a headstart in trade tech and until last session you've been uncontested on the trade scene. Now there are two trading powers, and soon more will join. You won't be able to monopolize as easily in Europe anymore.
Also, annexing Japan was an interesting move. We'll see if it pays out for you or if it'll become a burden...
Btw, I would also like to comment on my Mighty fort in Oberpfaltz. I got an event that took a small amount of cash, -1 offensive and gave me about 8-10 forts. Oberpfaltz was chosen several times by the random number generator, so it became Mighty. The -1 offensive did matter though, as Bremen had a much easier start of the war due to me not having the +1 shock edge.
Also, annexing Japan was an interesting move. We'll see if it pays out for you or if it'll become a burden...
Btw, I would also like to comment on my Mighty fort in Oberpfaltz. I got an event that took a small amount of cash, -1 offensive and gave me about 8-10 forts. Oberpfaltz was chosen several times by the random number generator, so it became Mighty. The -1 offensive did matter though, as Bremen had a much easier start of the war due to me not having the +1 shock edge.
Even so, I'm thinking that event probably ought to give one or two fewer forts, and/or cost two or three offensive instead of one. I can see in the future, when peoples' DPs are more ideal, someone simply sacrificing 1 offensive when they have 10, knowing they'll recoup it with their next click later on. Reckon it ought to be made a little more complicated.