The Pro-G review

[Susana]

As some of you have noticed and also commented on the below UK website, their first review of EU III was less than satisfactory on many levels. We have now worked with the Editor in Chief of the site to get an additional impression of the game and I'm sure that the massive number of posts the first review generated, also played a very big role in making this happen.

I trust that the posts on the site in response to this new review will be as respectful and constructive as most of the initial ones and while some of you might not agree on the score, it is a really big deal for a site to "modify" and add something onto an already published review. This should be seen as a way to try and meet the demands voiced by the very vocal community.

http://www.pro-g.co.uk/pc/europa_universalis_iii/review-2.html

Have a great weekend!

Kind regards
Susana Meza

 

[Porcius]

I got the feeling reading that it was written by the same guy, under orders to "make nice." Still not a very good review (quality wise, not game scoring wise).

Second review has a different byline, among other things. This one is by Thomas Kinnebrew, so it's clearly a different writer.

It reads like a feature list for most of the word count, though.