This, a thousand times this.
Let's recall that it was the freedom loving Europeans who stuck six million Jews in gas chambers,
Yes, let's blame all those occupied millions living under the Nazi rule for the crimes of Nazism. How very fair.
who carved empires across the world between 1800 and 1960, and so forth.
How is this even relevant to my argument? I never said Europeans were strangers to violence and oppression (especially of those they viewed as inferior). I said that European and Western culture in general isn't conducive to the Chinese model, which depends in large part on the traditional Chinese views of what a good government should be like (the 'mandate of heavens' and all that stuff). Also, China went up from being essentially a very poor Third World nation, and it still isn't as developed as New Europe would be at the same period, so it hasn't advanced that high on the Maslow's hierarchy of needs, so to speak - which again makes it easier to quell pro-democratic movements.
This "New Europe" would clearly not be analogous to modern day OTL China - especially not since it was forged by German military victories, as
Leviathan07 pointed out. In China, which is
relatively homogeneous compared to Europe, it is possible for the government to massacre a few thousand students and still not be seen as an enemy of the Chinese people. If on the other hand German tanks crushed pro-democracy demonstrations at Champs-Élysées, it would result in an universal condemnation by the French people. And if the puppet French government did it for them, everybody would still blame that on the Germans.
It would be just like 1989 in the Communist bloc. People were fed up, and when it became clear the Soviets wouldn't unleash their tanks like in 1956 and 1968, they took to the streets and brought the regimes down. It had generally nothing to do with the living standards, which for most people were fairly decent, especially in Czechoslovakia and East Germany. People just wanted their dignity back, it's what they missed the most under the totalitarian systems - but I guess that's hard to explain to someone who's never experienced such a life.
Since the "New Europe" system is a tongue-in-cheek analogy to the Communist system, I foresee the same ending for it.
And of course I wouldn't call the Soviet Union a freedom loving state. Contrast this with India, which seems to be getting along fine with a (admittedly messy) democracy.
Again, how is this relevant? You seem to be arguing against something I never said nor suggested.