The Dewey-Taft Feud
The 1940s was a prosperous decade for the Republican Party. Having regained the White House in 1940, the Party of Lincoln went on to recapture the House of Representatives in 1944 and the Senate in 1946. Times should have been golden for them; however, a major problem lurked beneath the surface. Controlling the Federal Government, Republicans were split about which ideological course to pursue. The Eastern Establishment, represented by Dewey, occupied the White House and wanted to purse a liberal, internationalist agenda. Congress, on the other hand, was led by Taft and wanted to move America in a conservative, isolationist direction. Rather than seek compromise, both sides insisted they were right and the other side was wrong. This “us-versus-them” mentality led to the fissure between the Left and Right wings of the G.O.P., which had been dormant during World War Two, being slowly awaken in 1947. Two years later, it would erupt violently, taking down the Party in the process.
The eruption began when Dewey delivered his 1949 State of the Union Address. With the Eightieth Congress, he had been willing to take what he could get – his anger notwithstanding. With the Eighty-First, he was different. In an uncompromising tone, he essentially told Congress,
“I have a liberal legislative agenda to enact. You will enact it. Doing nothing is not an option I will accept. If I have to knock some heads together, I will.”
Conservative Republicans and Southern Democrats sat stone-faced, not liking what they heard. Nor did they like what they heard in early February, when the President addressed a dinner honoring former President Abraham Lincoln’s one-hundred-fortieth birthday:
“The time has come to confront a truth. The Republican Party is split wide open. It has been split wide open for years, but we have tried to gloss it over. We have in our party some fine, high-minded patriotic people who honestly oppose farm price supports, unemployment insurance, old age benefits, slum clearance, and other social programs. These people consider these programs horrendous departures into paternalism. These people believe in a laissez-faire society and look back wistfully to the miscalled ‘good old days’ of the Nineteenth Century.
However, if such efforts to turn back the clock were actually pursued, you can bury the Republican Party as the deadest pigeon in the country. We need to stop bellyaching about the past and go on from there to provide progressive ideas in line with the overwhelming majority who believe that government has to be more than a cold and impartial umpire.
Those who oppose a liberal and progressive Republican Party ought to go out and try to get elected in a typical American community and see what happens to them. But they ought not to do it as Republicans. They should do it instead as slaves with chains around their minds and dangling on their heels. Those who are Republicans go as free men with their heads high and their minds and souls unfettered by the state. The whole difference between freedom and slavery lies in how you advance toward your goals.
I believe in social progress, under a flourishing, competitive system of private enterprise where every human right is expanded. I am opposed to delivering the nation into the hands of any group who will have the power to tell American people whether they may have food or fuel, shelter or jobs. My desire has always been to strip fat from government’s frame, replace political spoils with competent rule, and preserve individual freedom and economic incentive. I want to save Americans from the tyranny of the few.”
The Conservatives whom Dewey slammed were still in no mood to rubberstamp a domestic agenda they opposed. Republican Senator Ralph L. Carr of Colorado spoke on behalf of his colleagues:
“The President’s plan is not consonant with the American system of government, or with a capitalist economy. We Republicans need to take a determined stand against further experimentation in the field of socialism and Communist philosophy. The existence of an equality of opportunity is not to be questioned because some of our citizens refuse to put forth the necessary energy to realize that opportunity.”
The record of the Eighty-First Congress:
-Congress again ignored calls to improve health care, raise the minimum wage, increase unemployment compensation, expand Social Security, and streamline Civil Service. In addition, the creation of an agency to coordinate unemployment insurance between the states still went nowhere. Instead, they focused on cutting Federal spending wherever they could.
-A massive housing program was enacted. Under the Housing Act, Federal financing was provided to states for slum clearance, mortgage insurance from the Federal Housing Administration was increased, the Federal Government was authorized to build over eight-hundred-thousand low-cost public housing units, and the FHA was permitted to provide financing for rural homeowners. Taft had sponsored the bill, making it one of the few items he and Dewey could agree on.
-Congress did agree to increase Federal assistance for education (again, Taft supported this). However, Dewey’s call to outlaw discrimination in the classroom was blocked by Southern Democrats.
-In addition, Southern Democrats continued to block Dewey’s aggressive civil rights program. A Federal anti-lynching law (a Presidential priority since the Willkie Administration), a more effective statutory protection of voting rights, the abolition of the poll tax, establishing a permanent Fair Employment Practices Commission, ending discrimination in interstate travel, and enacting a constitutional amendment guaranteeing equal rights were all filibustered to death. Despite the Congressional roadblock, the President did find a few ways to advance the cause of civil rights. For instance, he denied government contracts or financial assistance to those with racially discriminatory practices and named African-Americans to Federal posts – most notably Bertha J. Diggs as Secretary of Labor. In turn, African-Americans strongly supported both Dewey and the Republican Party in general. In their eyes, the G.O.P. was at least trying to end discrimination.
In the end, Dewey was no happier with the Eighty-First Congress than he was with the previous one. Of course, he blamed Taft for blocking his agenda – once remarking that his archenemy should have carnal relations with himself. Why did he hate Taft so much? The answer has to do with the fact that the Ohio Senator wielded considerable influence seldom seen on Capitol Hill – so much power in fact that he earned the nickname
“Mr. Republican”. It was Taft who made committee assignments, set legislative priorities, and chose which proposals coming out of the Executive Branch would receive Congressional approval. He was also very detail-oriented, possessing an awe-inspiring mastery of facts and figures. Taft was also not afraid to snap at his colleagues and made no apologies for his icy demeanor.
The old saying
“This town isn’t big enough for the both of us!” appropriately sums up the relationship between Dewey and Taft. It wasn’t just that Dewey was a Liberal and Taft was a Conservative. What was at stake for them was control of the Republican Party. Like a title boxing match, the winner of this battle would become the Party’s undisputed leader. Both men wanted to be the champ, and neither one was willing to back down. It was the Dewey-versus-Taft conflict that laid at the heart of the erupting fissure that was tearing the Party apart.
Upon his return to the United States on June 10th from an inspection tour of Europe (which included strengthening America’s friendship with France, warning the United Kingdom not to tilt too much towards greater nationalization of their economy, and being treated like a national hero in the Federal Republic of Germany for his role in preventing the FRG from being carved up after the war), the President decided to react to Congress blatantly ignoring his
“pass my agenda or else” warning by carrying out his
“or else” threat. Acting in a
“two can play this game” mentality, Dewey exercised his veto power more frequently. Conservative bills – even those he might otherwise have approved – that reached his desk were quickly rejected and returned to Congress (which either had enough votes to override the veto or allowed the bill to die in vain). In doing so, Dewey was giving future historians a major reason for giving him mixed scores in Presidential rankings. One historian has explained why the thirty-fifth President generally sits in the “upper good, lower great” region:
“His foreign policy was excellent. His handling of both the Second World War and the Cold War showed off his decisiveness and firmness. His dealings with Congress, on the other hand, were horrendous. He was stubborn and unwilling to work with people he disagreed with. Not surprisingly, that makes for bad government.”
Equally stubborn was Taft. Instead of scaring him, Dewey’s vetoing only hardened the Ohio Senator. Whenever anyone asked why he didn’t want to seek an armistice, Mr. Republican always pounded his fist on the table and crisply stated that the White House was
“too liberal” and that he would continue to stonewall as long as he wanted.
The Federal Government is supposed to put the interest of the nation first. Obviously, the Republican White House and the Republican Congress were more interested in power struggles than in governing…and they would pay a heavy price for it as their feud entered the politically important year of 1950.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
1950 Overview of the Dewey Administration
Army
Infantry: 39
Cavalry: 15
Motorized: 11
Mechanized: 5
Armored: 25
Paratroop: 8
Marine: 15
Mountaineer: 15
Garrison: 4
Headquarters: 9
Militia: 11
Navy
Battleship: 29
Light Cruiser: 43
Heavy Cruiser: 21
Battlecruiser: 11
Destroyer Group: 45
Carrier: 17
Light Carrier: 8
Submarine: 13
Transport: 29
Air Force
Fighter: 8
Interceptor: 12
Strategic Bomber: 9
Tactical Bomber: 12
Naval Bomber: 9
Close Air Support: 8
Transport: 9
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Israel
It was during Dewey’s second term that the Middle East became an important region in the realm of America’s foreign policy. From this point on, events in this part of the world could no longer be ignored by the Americans. The first major postwar issue in the Middle East was the fate of Palestine. Since 1920, the British maintained control over Palestine in the form of a mandate.
For three decades, the British had to deal with two major populations that lived within Palestine: the Jews and the Palestinians. The problem was that both groups had staked historical claims to the area. Thus far, the British solution to this problem was to maintain strict immigrations quotas for Jews interested in moving to Palestine. However, rather than ease tensions between these two different groups, the quotas eventually made things worse. By the late 1940s, a series of violent attacks conducted by the Jewish Resistance Movement against the British had made the Mandate untenable. One terrorist attack alone killed ninety-one people when the Irgun (the military arm of the JRM) bombed the King David Hotel in Jerusalem. The hotel was targeted because it was the site of the central offices of the Mandate authorities.
Upon becoming Prime Minister in July 1948, Attlee decided enough was enough. A few months into his Premiership, Attlee announced his country was planning to terminate the Palestine Mandate and turn the issue over to the United Nations. On February 15th, 1949, the UN created a special committee consisting of representatives from eleven countries to research the Palestine question and come up with a solution. Three months later, a solution was proposed: create independent Palestinian and Jewish states, with Jerusalem placed under international administration.
On August 29th, the Partition Plan was placed before the General Assembly of the United Nations for a vote. By a margin of twenty votes, the Plan was approved (United States Ambassador Arthur Vandenberg had worked behind the scenes to see the measure through). It would take effect on February 15th, 1950 – the date the British would withdraw from Palestine. The Jews were elated by the news, while Arabs across the region vehemently rejected the Plan. Meeting in Cairo, Egypt shortly after the vote, Arab nations decided to militarily oppose the creation of a Jewish state. The result was a civil war between Jewish and Arab communities throughout Palestine that would last until the termination of the British Mandate took effect in mid-February. Thousands of people would be killed and wounded in a struggle to determine the outcome of Partition.
Where did the United States stand in all this? The President strongly supported the establishment of a Jewish state in the Middle East. From the moment he took office, Dewey had consistently pressured the British to allow more Jews to migrate to Palestine. He met often with leaders of the Jewish community; assuring them that the United States was genuinely committed to supporting the Zionist cause. Dewey’s position was overwhelmingly backed by public opinion…but not the State Department. In meetings in the Oval Office, Marshall and others strongly disagreed with the President. They argued it would arouse Arab hostility, endanger America’s access to petroleum resources throughout the region, and have a negative impact on the national security front. On November 12th, Marshall went as far as saying that the United States was
“playing with fire while having nothing with which to put it out.”
However, having made up his mind to back the Partition Plan, Dewey refused to back down. At one point, he point-blankly reminded his Secretary of State (this is his remarks in a nutshell),
“I am in charge here, George. I have the final word on all matters. We are going to support the Jews, whether you like it or not. You know I have a ‘Zero Tolerance’ policy towards insubordination. If this bothers you that much, I will accept your resignation and find someone else to do your job.”
With the State Department effectively sidelined, Dewey met with renowned Zionist leader Chaim Weizmann on December 18th and informed him that the United States would recognize the Jewish state when it came into being. The small and charming Weizmann thanked him for
“the sympathetic interest which you have constantly devoted to the cause of our people.”
The dramatic moment came on February 14th, 1950. With the Mandate set to expire the next day, an interim Jewish government headed by Prime Minister David Ben-Gurion issued a Declaration of Independence and called their new nation “Israel” (the biblical name for the region). Eleven minutes later, Dewey publicly announced that the United States formally recognized the State of Israel – the first nation to do so. Of course, Jewish reaction was nothing but deeply moving gratitude. For instance, Chief Rabbi of Israel Isaac Halevi Herzog told the President:
“God put you in your mother’s womb so you would be the instrument to bring the rebirth of Israel after two thousand years.”
With Israel now on the map, Arabs became hell-bent on stamping it out. The bloody civil war that had been raging since last September suddenly transformed into all-out war. The day after Israel came into being, a large Arab army comprised of thousands of troops belonging to Egypt, Iraq, Jordan, Lebanon, and Syria invaded the newborn country. In response, the newly created Israel Defense Forces defended their home turf with an initial army of thirty-thousand (to grow steadily by an average of ten-thousand soldiers a month).
Watching the war unfold from the White House, the President not only opposed the Arab invasion but wanted to militarily aid the Israelis in the
“rightful defense of their country.”
Meeting with his Joint Chiefs of Staff, the Commander-in-Chief stated that he wanted to deploy thirty-thousand troops and a carrier task force to the Middle East to prop up America’s newest ally. It was Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Dwight D. Eisenhower who talked him out of it. Displaying the levelheadedness that had made him so indispensable in Dewey’s eyes, Eisenhower warned that military intervention by the United States to protect Israel would require at least three times the amount Dewey had in mind.
“Mr. President,” Ike said plainly,
“I know you want to help the Jews and that is admirable. However, the hard truth is that if we go into Israel, we are going to be fighting the entire Middle East. We will run the risk of transforming a regional conflict into a new global war. If we go into the Middle East, the Arabs might turn to the Soviet Union for support. If the Soviets get involved, we could be looking at World War Three. Mr. President, I cannot stress enough how risky this situation is. It has only been three years since Japan surrendered. That involved a massive lost of life. If we go to war in the Middle East, victory will be very hard to achieve…if we can achieve it at all.”
The President leaned back in his chair, taking Eisenhower’s words into consideration. After a few minutes of silence, Dewey leaned forward and spoke:
“Gentlemen, I can disagree with Marshall and I can disagree with others. I cannot disagree with Ike.”
Backing down, he scrapped the idea of military intervention. Instead, he would take the less risky step of authorizing arms shipments to Israel. Once again, Eisenhower was the hero of the day – this time nipping war in the bud. As it turned out, direct American involvement wasn’t needed. Israel not only held her ground but fought back. The war lasted until April 20th, 1951, when the Arabs threw in the towel. In the end, Israel decisively came out on top. In a series of armistice agreements reached between Israel and her enemies, territorial lines were established that greatly benefitted Israel – even though Egypt was allowed to retain control over a strip of the Mediterranean coastline called the Gaza Strip and Jordan occupied the West Bank of the River Jordan. Of course, the end of the 1950 Arab-Israeli War didn’t mean Israel could sit back and relax. Instead, the nation would find herself continually at war with her neighbors all the way to today. From Dewey on, every President would more-or-less have to deal with conflicts in the Middle East.
Ironically, the birth of Israel witnessed the end of George C. Marshall’s career. At the same time the United States geared up to recognize Israel, Marshall quietly handed in his resignation. In their final meeting, Marshall informed Dewey that he was retiring solely on the grounds of ill health.
“This has nothing to do with Palestine,” he firmly insisted,
“My opposition to the position you wish to take is not a public one; nor will I make it public. One does not resign because a President who has the constitutional right to make a decision made one.”
With Marshall’s departure, the President needed to find his third Secretary of State. Having gone through a politician and a military general, Dewey decided to make an unorthodox pick. To the surprise of the entire nation, famed poet Allen Tate was tapped to succeed Marshall. Hailing from Kentucky, Tate was a Southern poet best known for “Ode to the Confederate Dead”. The closest he ever came to foreign policy was his condemnation of Fascism and National Socialism. When asked why he wanted a former Poet Laureate Consultant in Poetry to the Library of Congress to run the State Department, Dewey admitted he wanted a “yes-man” that he could order around. In other words, this was a power-grab move on the part of the President. He would tell Tate what to do, and the Secretary of State would do it without question. For the rest of the Dewey Administration, the State Department was effectively connected to the White House – Tate being nothing more than a puppet.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Apparently, Paradox thinks writing poems qualifies a person to be Foreign Minister.