But there is a fusion of New Democrats and Federals, and since you are so closely bound, it is now basically one party ((which may break apart))
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
But you said something about a New Democrat-Federalist alliance, did you not? And he would most certainly fall within that category. Besides, you did use to be part of the New Democratic Party, did you not? So your point is somewhat moot, still. Excuse me if I am incorrect, but if I am accurate, my point stands.
I was never a New Democrat, I was an Idependent who recently joined the Federalists. And just because there is a current Unity Ticket, does not mean we are one single party. Look at the Unity Ticket when the SNP first formed, they split once their first election was up and reverted to their previous parties, I see that happening in this case as well. Too many difference between our parties for us to work coherently together for more than just this election. And so I will say again: The Federalist-New Democrat Unity Ticket is not one party.
If you are acting under one ticket, shouldn't your coalition take responsibility for that politician's actions? Unless your coalition is already fragmenting in its infancy and you want to play the blame game.
Why should we do that, when the Republicans have continued to put a blind eye towards the "dirty politics" of their own members, which started this entire circle of dirtyness.
We have slung mud, but so has the New Democratic and Federalist parties! Calling us traitors, blind, neanderthals, or what have you is just as much mudslinging as our side. However, my criticisms are based on fact, not insults.
I have not seen anyone call the Republicans traitors, being blind is the lowest of any insult, anf neanderthals does not belong to my party, so really the Federalists do not belong on that list. And the Republicans would be at the top of any such as list, seeing as their predecessor, the Whigs, began all this and passed it on to their sons, who have made the Whig Party proud with their mud-slinging.
You called us as bad as traitors. You called us dishonourable. I think both qualify as mud slinging. That you are more interested in mud slinging, insults, and the like, is odd, considering, in four years time, this nation could be at war, losing thousands of men overseas, in the wars of the New Democrats and Federalists!
Then what is that I smell, floating down from Ohio? Could that be the aroma of hypocrisy, for who is the one trying to destroy the reputation of the Republican Party? Perhaps you need to see to your own hands, Mr. Khur, for you are a practitioner of mudslinging, no doubt about it! Even worse, you try to excuse your own excesses and detach yourselves from the other part of your coalition!
New Democrats, do not trust Mr. Khur or his party. If they are unreliable now, who knows what voice you shall have in government? At least our Party will respect your authority as leaders of the opposition, no matter how heated Congressional debates get. This government will detach itself when it senses bad tidings, leaving you to handle the storm.
New Democrats, do not trust Mr. Khur or his party. If they are unreliable now, who knows what voice you shall have in government? At least our Party will respect your authority as leaders of the opposition, no matter how heated Congressional debates get. This government will detach itself when it senses bad tidings, leaving you to handle the storm.
This partisan bickering over insults and nonsense must end. We should debate the issues that affect the American people not who insulted who.
I agree.
Federalists and assorted ex-Libertarians, please propose some indirect anti-monopoly legislation (See Sherman anti-trust act and all that jazz for a poor example with the right intent))
Republicans et al, how about some feedback on my tax bill counter-proposal.
((If we're stuck waiting on the general election we might as well come up with some Acts to vote on at the same time.))
Excellent. You policed yourselves.
Jarvis, if no one from your party wants to be VP, make an NPC to fill the spot, so we can get to the election. (Like Carlos Hound of the Libertarians in 1861).
Jarvis, if no one from your party wants to be VP, make an NPC to fill the spot, so we can get to the election. (Like Carlos Hound of the Libertarians in 1861).
I'm an Independent. I gave every party the chance to convince me to vote for them, however the republicans disappointed me with their policies.
I advocate we attack Spain, keep Cuba and Keep Porto Rica. We have as much claim on those lands as we do on the former Mexican lands. Keeping these lands will make the Cuban people Stronger! Keeping these lands will make Cuba Stronger! Keeping these lands will make America Stronger!
Well I'd much like to see the reintroduction of the Second Bill of Rights, if anyone will offer their support for it this time.
How about Walsh for the vice presidency?
((Well if we do that, we might as well take Guam and the Philippines while we're at it.))
((If we're going to war it's pointless to be half-hearted about gains. Might as well take the whole package. Does anyone have komisha's tax bill post?))
Nope. I've done the math. 26.50 infamy gained. Only about 1 year where anyone would have reason to f*** with us, and nobody's going to take that chance.