-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Howard
...And may I add, gentlemen, that the divisive nature of the statements surrounding this election strike me as extremely undesirable. That goes for both parties, though it pains me to criticize by extent the leaderships of such fine gentlemen as Mssrs. Mandrake and Howard.
I should not need to remind all of you, gentlemen, that divisiveness is what spawned the conflict that claimed the lives of so many other excellent men and that men such as myself and General Mandrake fought to end.
I move, gentlemen, that in future we turn away from such outlandish rhetoric and instead focus on our own individual campaigns, for the sake of the unity of our glorious Republic.
...And may I add, gentlemen, that the divisive nature of the statements surrounding this election strike me as extremely undesirable. That goes for both parties, though it pains me to criticize by extent the leaderships of such fine gentlemen as Mssrs. Mandrake and Howard.
I should not need to remind all of you, gentlemen, that divisiveness is what spawned the conflict that claimed the lives of so many other excellent men and that men such as myself and General Mandrake fought to end.
I move, gentlemen, that in future we turn away from such outlandish rhetoric and instead focus on our own individual campaigns, for the sake of the unity of our glorious Republic.
Last edited:
I have to say I am torn, between my party of its most serene ideals, and a candidate of the most unfortunate disposition. I think I might sit out for a bit and watch the happenings.
Country comes before party.
Country comes before party.
((I'd like to point out, that while not really that active, Vandrove and his supporters are not members of the Libertarian party.))
Mandrake
Maryland is pleased to see both parties care about the future prosperity of American agriculture, but disagrees with the New Democrat views on the army, foreign policy, and industrial welfare.
Maryland is pleased to see both parties care about the future prosperity of American agriculture, but disagrees with the New Democrat views on the army, foreign policy, and industrial welfare.
Last edited:
Mr. Vandrove, might I suggest my Mandrake/Jarvis? I am aware that, on economic policies, we differ greatly, but I also know that Marxism is completely opposed to imperialistic wars of conquest, which the Republican Party opposes, as well. Do you want the National Vinogradists to rise to power, or the interventionism of the New Democrats to lead us to imperialism?
Senator Henry J. Jarvis of California, Champion of the Constitution and Republican Vice-Presidential Candidate
Senator Henry J. Jarvis of California, Champion of the Constitution and Republican Vice-Presidential Candidate
While I agree that the National Vinogradists have ushered in an even greater era of imperialism, and have taken power under the false pretense of "Fighting for the common man", while in fact they are merely puppets of corporatism. Although this is true, I cannot support capitalism of any kind, nor can I participate in this flawed electoral system any longer.
While disagree with those principles, I cannot help but respect you for sticking by them.
Ladies and gentlemen, do you want imperialism? Nation-building? War? If so, support Howard or Bryan. Howard has supported entangling himself in European affairs, and Bryan is a threat to freedom everywhere. If you support friendship with all nations, trade, prosperity and peace, vote Mandrake/Jarvis! We have consistently advocated non-interventionism, favoured free trade, and supported the fostering of warm, peaceful coexistence with all nations.
Now I ask you this; do you want government regulation, corporatism, statism, and tyranny? That is the inevitable result of supporting the idea that government is a source for good, the fount of growth, and the guarantor and creator of rights. Do you want to dictated? Or do you wish to live your life without interference, to do as you wish, so long as you violate no other man's rights? If you wish the former, vote for Howard or Bryan. If you support the latter, vote for Mandrake/Jarvis!
Senator Henry J. Jarvis of California, Champion of the Constitution and Republican Vice-Presidential Candidate
Ladies and gentlemen, do you want imperialism? Nation-building? War? If so, support Howard or Bryan. Howard has supported entangling himself in European affairs, and Bryan is a threat to freedom everywhere. If you support friendship with all nations, trade, prosperity and peace, vote Mandrake/Jarvis! We have consistently advocated non-interventionism, favoured free trade, and supported the fostering of warm, peaceful coexistence with all nations.
Now I ask you this; do you want government regulation, corporatism, statism, and tyranny? That is the inevitable result of supporting the idea that government is a source for good, the fount of growth, and the guarantor and creator of rights. Do you want to dictated? Or do you wish to live your life without interference, to do as you wish, so long as you violate no other man's rights? If you wish the former, vote for Howard or Bryan. If you support the latter, vote for Mandrake/Jarvis!
Senator Henry J. Jarvis of California, Champion of the Constitution and Republican Vice-Presidential Candidate
Mandrake. ((have we had a general ever take office before?))
Not the best, but these will work (I had to guess on just about everybody's picture - we'll say maybe that these were fliers reproduced in Oregon, so the printers hadn't seen the candidates or good photographs of them): Libertarian, New Democratic, and Republican
That old picture! I've long since grown out a beard (if I'd known you did the posters, I would have sent you a picture of Benjamin Harrison I found. Great job, though!). Ah, no matter. You can tell by the quality who has the most resources, and by that, the most support!
Senator Henry J. Jarvis of California, Champion of the Constitution and Republican Vice-Presidential Candidate ((and candidate with the best beard))
Senator Henry J. Jarvis of California, Champion of the Constitution and Republican Vice-Presidential Candidate ((and candidate with the best beard))
Least our pictures are in colour... But I do like your hat. Trying to pull off the folksy look?:happy:
Now that's not nice... I believe Bryan shouldn't be demeaned like that!
Now that's not nice... I believe Bryan shouldn't be demeaned like that!
Now that's not nice... I believe Bryan shouldn't be demeaned like that!
I'm afraid its not Bryan I was referring about. I would rather even Bryan was in the White house than, *him*.
None of you will ever outmatch me, the dashing Benjamn Rutledge. I have spent many years in the fields and as a Senator, but I retain the vigor and youth of Maryland, patron saint of wheat and tobacco!