The Obligatory CK2 Strange Screenshot Thread
- Thread starter Samefar
- Start date
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
This definitely needs to be stickied as the longest post on these forums thus far!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:D...ptbetriebswerkbauunterbeamtengesellschaft.ogg
This guy really pronounced it
Not a real word, by the way, as it was never in use for anything.
Good job I executed him, don't want the Hodmoneskyhrfsjadxnzjkf dynasty to usurp my title.
It describes a possible construction which is grammatically correct. Insofar it is a real word. If you're still not happy there's always Rindfleischetikettierungsüberwachungsaufgabenübertragungsgesetz for you.Not a real word, by the way, as it was never in use for anything.
My vassal the High Chief of Genoa means well, but his insistence on leading the siege even though my troops outnumber his 260 to 1 (with another nearby 23k troops) means he really isn't helping.
This angers me to no end. Especially when my 20k camel warriors are taking attrition because the 150 troops sitting in the province don't want to assault. I have declared wars before simply to stop this BS.
he's only got a handful of troops, won't be able to siege by himself. pull out and when he leaves because he doesn't have enough troops to seige move back in
Five way civil war in the HRE... not something you see every day
War of five kings! I mean, emperors.
Even worse when it's a vassal of someone you're supposed to be hostile to:
I opportunistically invaded Carpathian Revolt and took all their Balkan land, except this one county. The army keeping me back from assaulting is a vassal of Carpathia. Apparently Carpathia itself is hostile to me (because I'm at war with their rebelling vassal), but for whatever reason their vassals aren't. Even if I waited for a slow siege it'd be Carpathia that got it and not me, so there's really no point.
