These horses are much more dangerous than we think:
View attachment 486014
well, not really
View attachment 486016
What’s up with your government type?
The Obligatory CK2 Strange Screenshot Thread
- Thread starter Samefar
- Start date
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
What’s up with your government type?
My government here is nomadic, and dead have no government.
Double kill!These horses are much more dangerous than we think:
View attachment 486014
well, not really
View attachment 486016
.png){kind=avatar}
I've learned this from history lessons. It's so called Ængland Colonies in Africa.
Another irritating bug
I'd like to be King rather than Emperor! And I guess I should not form Empire of Bulgaria with Egypy...
I'd like to be King rather than Emperor! And I guess I should not form Empire of Bulgaria with Egypy...
I actually started in Prussia (not even part of de jure Pomerania) and had a hard time getting the territory required to form any kingdom despite holding serious territory in three different ones. in the end I had to keep pummeling the existing king of Pomerania until he no longer existed so I could grab the title.
Trying my first Iron Century game and I'm...getting some mixed signals from Otto, here.
Maybe he's bipolar?
Maybe he's bipolar?
nah, that happens all the time when you siege down holdings yourself (or other commanders actually)
Strong and Weak leaders are not mutually exclusive for whatever reason, so one time you may have get weak leader, one time you get strong leader. At the end of the day, just destroy everything and get wroth/cruel :-D
so the king of gemany died with no male hair so it went to his first daughters child.. a 7 year old sumonesko.
(kinda wish the ai would matri marry more often as i dont see them do it at all)
(kinda wish the ai would matri marry more often as i dont see them do it at all)
I have a couple here. Had quite some time on my hand so I might have played "a lot"...
It wasn't successful.
As an aside, I've never seen Catholicism do that bad before. The guy in the next screenshot may have to do something with that.
It wasn't successful.
My son got Decadent, wouldn't straighten up, but I could take him along on my Hajj. He didn't lose the trait. I played on as him, decadence didn't stop rising until I realized Zealous would remove it (as it did).
Reformation wasn't a surprise. That the AI didn't go for Temporal was, at least to me.
I think it was only added with the Holy Fury patch, so it's relatively recent.
If you dive into the game files, you'll see that it's pure random chance what the AI picks for leadership, other than autonomous. The Germanics are most likely to pick Temporal (all religions have a default option that's much more likely than the others), but they still have a roughly 17% chance to pick temporal or hierocratic.Reformation wasn't a surprise. That the AI didn't go for Temporal was, at least to me.
All good.
That is a horrifying event! I checked the game files to see what that was all about, but apparently it does nothing. It's just a scary message. The custom tooltip of the option is labelled "seraphims," though. Are Paradox trying to say that those spectres were seraphim? The dicationary defines seraphim as:
"an angelic being, regarded in traditional Christian angelology as belonging to the highest order of the ninefold celestial hierarchy, associated with light, ardour, and purity."
Turning your poor guards into ash isn't really what I associate with light, ardour, purity, and angels of the highest order.