Medieval trans, nothing to see here.She's the best king ever.
No idea how or why this happened![]()
Yes, poor Oscar Wilde, Sappho and Michelangelo - living all their lives without realizing that they were homosexual. I think you are both mistaken. If you like naked men, you know it. You don't need porn and internet to understand it. How you will accept that is another matter.I mean, it isn't like they have a ready supply of porn they can use to discover their interests, likes, and dislikes back then. It's pretty easy to figure out your sexuality in the age of the internet, significantly less so in medieval Europe.
You have chosen persons from VERY different time-space intervals.Yes, poor Oscar Wilde, Sappho and Michelangelo - living all their lives without realizing that they were homosexual. I think you are both mistaken. If you like naked men, you know it. You don't need porn and internet to understand it. How you will accept that is another matter.
You have chosen persons from VERY different time-space intervals.
Medieval Western-Central Europe and that time Christianity put great emphasis on "zero sexuality" behaviors. It doesn't meant, everyone followed, but sexuality as we know it know was suppressed greatly. Making love (any type of it) was not something a man would think much that days - at least he was taught not to. Man was taught to seek 'honor', 'virtue', not a bedchamber. This basically meant any type of sexuality was so suppressed in a subject, that said subject couldn't even notice (or would forcefully discard them) any sexual preferences. A man would literary make love with a woman often only to produce a child, not because, ya now, it's kind of a pleasure. Man could even feel disgust for such a thing. Embracing sexuality was tabu (lust is one of seven deadly sins for a reason). Therefore one man could not properly feel attraction to other man simply because 'attraction' was already kinda 'unclean'.
You have chosen persons from VERY different time-space intervals.
Medieval Western-Central Europe and that time Christianity put great emphasis on "zero sexuality" behaviors. It doesn't meant, everyone followed, but sexuality as we know it know was suppressed greatly. Making love (any type of it) was not something a man would think much that days - at least he was taught not to. Man was taught to seek 'honor', 'virtue', not a bedchamber. This basically meant any type of sexuality was so suppressed in a subject, that said subject couldn't even notice (or would forcefully discard them) any sexual preferences. A man would literary make love with a woman often only to produce a child, not because, ya now, it's kind of a pleasure. Man could even feel disgust for such a thing. Embracing sexuality was tabu (lust is one of seven deadly sins for a reason). Therefore one man could not properly feel attraction to other man simply because 'attraction' was already kinda 'unclean'.