A nice stable period can be good sometimes - I know you said you would keep to Ireland, but will you go into Wales or Scotland at all?
As for long-term holdings? No. I might meddle with who rules them though. Probably will.A nice stable period can be good sometimes - I know you said you would keep to Ireland, but will you go into Wales or Scotland at all?
As for long-term holdings? No. I might meddle with who rules them though. Probably will.
Oh, and you'll see the first meddling soon (once I can post it), I think it'll be deliciously ironic.
While the idea of putting an Irishman on the throne of England is exhilarating, I do worry that it might lead to enormous trouble later on, though. When your king does, Flaithbertach will inherit a claim, too, right? If he holds on to his throne, he or his sons might want to snatch Ireland from your eldest son.Fantastic! I like the idea of giving away the kingdom - it seems to fit your kind, humble ruler well![]()
While the idea of putting an Irishman on the throne of England is exhilarating, I do worry that it might lead to enormous trouble later on, though. When your king does, Flaithbertach will inherit a claim, too, right? If he holds on to his throne, he or his sons might want to snatch Ireland from your eldest son.
As Ireland, it's never a good idea to give England a claim on your lands...
Well, I hope they'll get along. England isn't strong enough to take Ireland, not the way it is right now, with one third of it being Norway. With a merc company or two I can take it in the field by myself, and I have allies aplenty. The only truly worrying thing is that Flaithbertach is married to the Kaiser's daughter and thus allied to him as well.While the idea of putting an Irishman on the throne of England is exhilarating, I do worry that it might lead to enormous trouble later on, though. When your king does, Flaithbertach will inherit a claim, too, right? If he holds on to his throne, he or his sons might want to snatch Ireland from your eldest son.
As Ireland, it's never a good idea to give England a claim on your lands...
Sure it was an illness? My experience with giving kingdoms to younger sons is, that they tend to murder their older brothers who have not yet been empowered by becoming kings themselves.[...]
Back at home, Gilla-Pátraic, the elder son of Gabrán, died of illness, childless. This meant that Flaithbertach was poised to unite the thrones of England and Ireland again, eventually. Though Flaithbertach swore that should such thing happen, he'd relinquish the throne of England to a relative.
[...]
Pretty sure the game would claim 'accident' if it was actual murder, and not explicitly state illness as the reason. As for the granting land to sons, I'm planning to move onto more distant relatives like younger brothers, cousins, nephews etc. It's annoying to inherit something like bloody England all of sudden.Sure it was an illness? My experience with giving kingdoms to younger sons is, that they tend to murder their older brothers who have not yet been empowered by becoming kings themselves.![]()
King vs courtier: king succeeds in murdering the courtier 99 our of 100 cases.
Keep an eye out for those patterns... elder brothers dieing as young courtiers, after their younger brothers have received kingdoms... I do not think this strategy of landing younger brothers before elder ones is a good strategy at all. Unless you deliberately want your oldest sons to die.
The Irish troops have barely disembarked back in Ireland, and Sven sent another missive - Wanko rebelled yet again.
Pretty sure the game would claim 'accident' if it was actual murder, and not explicitly state illness as the reason. As for the granting land to sons, I'm planning to move onto more distant relatives like younger brothers, cousins, nephews etc. It's annoying to inherit something like bloody England all of sudden.