But as you said yourself, the killings of right wingers were "as usual crimes" - murders of single persons, done by small semi-independently acting croups. When the republicans controlled a village, there could've been a couple of robberies, a couple of murders (the richest person, the priest if he wasn't personally popular, a member of the nobility, the local police perhaps) done by local radicals or just ordinary criminals who used the situation to their advantage.[/quotee]
You don't undertand me. When the CNT members burn a church, torture and slain the priests, rape the nuns, etc... Nobody in the goverment does nothing in order to stop this. For example.
Kasakka said:
But when the nationalists came, they made lists of "dangerous persons" with the help of the local right wingers, the soldiers acting as coherent units led by their officers rounded up leftist party members, local labour unionists, family members of republican soldiers... then made them dig a grave, lined them up on the edge and gunned down the whole lot.
There is a thin line between execution and murder, systematical slaughter and "daggers in the dark". Not saying that killing innocent people was ever right, I daresay the nationalist side far exceeded the republicans when it comes to the volume of crimes of war.
This happened in both sides. There is the Slaugther of the Modelo prision of Madrid: All political prisioners (Yes,
political, just like in a dictatorial regime) were slain only because they were "enemy of the revolution" or "fascist simpatizer" (Democrat Right Wing too). A methodical and mass assassination. There is too the "Paracuellos Massacre", an event like the famous Katyn Massacre, but with nationalits civilians instead polish officials.
Both "Republicans" and "Nationals" (Wrong names) comitted crimes of war.