The Lion Triumphs over the Bear
The Third Russo-Persian war was initiated by the Russians in June of 1750. The Tsarina Elizabeth hoped to overturn the Persian privilige of military access through Russia, and to take those territories east of the Caspian Sea that Russia had coveted since the days of Peter the Great. This time the Persians boldly took the offensive, charging into Armenia and Daghestan and Russian Central Asia. The Russians expected a repeat of their previous experiences of victory over the Persians, but were shocked to find their foe equally as technically advanced as they.
Meanwhile the Persian side of the war had become a series of bloody battles along the Volga. Finally, in 1753 The Persian army demanded and recieved military access through Ottoman territory, and broke the stalemate by sending an army of 60,000 men through the Caucasus to assault Russian positions in Ukraine and points North. With her whole defensive effort unhinged, Elizabeth sued for peace.
This was a landmark victory for Persia, as they had fought the Russians on their own ground and won. Yet the Russian Bear had not yet been completely vanquished, only the margins of their territory had been nibbled away at. A final contest would be needed to decide the issue. Persia quietly continued to build up her armed strength, including the construction of conscription centers in Isfahan, Tehran, Hamedan, and Merv, and the drafting of an army of 400,000 men. The next war would be decisive.
(Meanwhile, between 1770 and 1786, Persia and her allies fought two wars against the Sunni rulers of the Hijaz; these wars ended with the annexation of Mecca, holiest city of Islam, to Persia)
The war came in August of 1805, when Russia declared war on Persia with the support of its allies in France, the Netherlands, and Saxony. Though a small expeditionary force of less than 10,000 French troops would land in Awhaz on the Persian Gulf, they were obsolescent compared to Persian forces, and too few to have any effect.
The Ottomans, a Persian ally, were also ineffective. In many ways they had never recovered from the day in 1611, when Shah Abbas I had forced them to accept Shi'a Islam. Of all their territories, only the Arabs of the Levant accepted Shi'ism, and the loss in income and manpower had left the Turks weak, especially in technology. Their possessions in Ukraine were picked off the vine by Russian armies, and in only a few years they gave them up to withdraw from the war.
The war would be fought by Persians and Russians, and the Persian Army immediately proved itself equal to the contest. Decades of military investment had made it the most advanced in the world, and the Persian manpower reserves of nearly half a million men were colossal enough to render Russia nearly a mote in comparison. The Russian armies were rapidly annihilated in border battles as the Persian army marched out of Astrakhan and assaulted cities in southern Russia. After the withdrawal of the Ottomans from the war, Persian troops marched through their territory as well, reinforcing the thrust to the northwest.
Although the harsh Russian winters took a severe toll on Persian forces, they received continual reinforcements. Finally, in 1808, Persian forces reached the walls of Moscow itself, and took it in a short seige. Russian power was utterly broken in Asia, and the court in Isfahan briefly considered extending the march all the way to the shores of the Baltic Sea, to take St. Petersburg and drag the Tsar back to Persia to swear eternal fealty. But already, hundreds of thousands had died in the war, and Persia was not unmerciful. With Persia's primacy demonstrated, only a few territories in Central Asia changed hands.
In 1820, Persia was master of West Asia from the Tigris to the Ganges. Though her naval and trading technology lagged somewhat behind the Western European powers, Persia's land military technology and infrastructure were the most advanced in the world, and her vast territory produced enormous wealth. Also, Persia boasted the most innovative administration, and the most free populace, of any nation in the world.
Would these policies be able to sustain Persia, a land divided into dozens of ethnic groups and a plethora of religions, in the future?