The Least flavored region in the whole game: a couple of suggestions to fix it. (Siberia)

  • We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.

macky527

Captain
26 Badges
Feb 11, 2018
334
362
  • Stellaris - Path to Destruction bundle
  • Europa Universalis 4: Emperor
  • Crusader Kings III: Royal Edition
  • Crusader Kings III
  • Stellaris: Federations
  • Europa Universalis IV: Golden Century
  • Europa Universalis IV: Dharma
  • Stellaris: Distant Stars
  • Europa Universalis IV: Rule Britannia
  • Europa Universalis IV: Cradle of Civilization
  • Stellaris: Synthetic Dawn
  • Europa Universalis IV: Third Rome
  • Europa Universalis IV: Mandate of Heaven
  • Crusader Kings II
  • Europa Universalis IV: Rights of Man
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Cadet
  • Stellaris
  • Europa Universalis IV: Mare Nostrum
  • Europa Universalis IV: Cossacks
  • Europa Universalis IV: Common Sense
  • Europa Universalis IV: El Dorado
  • Europa Universalis IV: Res Publica
  • Europa Universalis IV: Wealth of Nations
  • Europa Universalis IV: Conquest of Paradise
  • Europa Universalis IV: Art of War
  • Europa Universalis IV
Currently, Siberia is arguably the least flavored region in the whole game. Even if it is not #1 it is definetly high up on the list. This is because the game neglects Siberia a lot in terms of... everything. In this thread I will give out some ideas for Siberia. The issues plaguing the region in my opinion are:
1 - A ill-fitted religion. Tengriism in-game represents most forms of Siberian shamanism under it's umbrella (except ainu for some reason?), but it's bonuses are ill-fitted for siberians. The lack of more flavor events also is a mark against it.
2 - Lack of unique NI's. Tags like Nivkh and Chukchi have easy potential for national ideas, with clear focuses, but instead use the generic siberian ideas. It is okay for some tags with little data (like Chavchuveny for example, i need help with them as i cant find anything on them), but having more unique ideas
3 - Arguably the least developed government reform in the whole game, the Siberian Clan Council. For a start it doesn't have estates or factions, while most government reforms have one. Native Americans do not have either as well, but are compensated with Federations, Tribal Development, and unique native buildings, all of which SCC's lack. Am not saying 'give Siberians New World mechanics', am saying that Siberians need something accurate but can also make them fun to play.
4 - Not enough tags. One of the things that makes a region more fun is the number of tags; The more tags in an area, the more possible alliances, targets for war, and it generally makes gameplay look more interesting. Tag-making may be a bit restrained now, but there are certainly ways to fit relevant tags in Siberia.

This one is the easiest to implement and one of the more important ones, so this goes first. @Pavía . In here, I have made national ideas for Nivkh and Chukchi (2 "musts"!) and Kamchadals, Khodynt, Nanai, Orochoni and Xibe (also important, but not as needed as the former two.)

First is Nivkh ideas. I have already made these before on Paradox Forums, but am gonna put these here again. the Nivkh ideas should be focused on trade and diplomacy, with a potential naval focus as well. Note that subsitute ideas are made as well, if you do not like some of the modifiers I put.

Traditions:
+10% Trade Efficiency
+10% Naval Morale

1) +1 diplo rep
2) +10% global sailors, +10% global trade power
3) +10% production efficiency
4) -1 national unrest
5) +10% goods produced
6) +15% trade range
7)+10% Infantry Combat ability

Ambition: +15% improve relations

Another modifier I was thinking of was +1 accepted cultures, this can replace Naval Morale, or be combined with the diplo rep at the first slot.

Next is Chukchi ideas. The fact you guys have not made a separate national idea set for the Chukchi is kinda strange in my opinion, as they were by far the most relevant of the 4 "Far East" siberian tags. I have given them a military-oriented set, to reference the long conflict they had against the Russians. The "Prussia of Siberia" if you will.
Traditions:
+25% loot amount
+15% movement speed
1) -15% land attrition
2) +10% land morale
3) -10% shock damage recieved
4) +10% goods produced
5) -5% fire damage recieved, +2.5% discipline
6) +15% global trade power
7) +20 settler increase
Ambition: +20% global sailors

If you want to cement this tag as militaristic, you can replace one of the traditions or the ambition with Shock Damage Recieved, moving the Fire Damage Recieved to the Shock Damage Recieved slot, and buffing the discipline to 5%, but I feel that this is good already.

Next is Nanai ideas. They were pretty different from Jurchens so imo a set for them is quite needed, and this is the 3rd most important NI set I am making, although it isn't as urgent as Nivkh or Chukchi. If Orochoni does not get their own set, then they should use Nanai ideas, rather than Jurchen.

Traditions:
+2 tolerance of the true faith
-15% shock damage recieved
1) -20% land attrition
2) +10% global sailors, +10% global trade power
3) -0.02 war exhaustion
4) +10% production efficiency
5) +1 legitimacy
6) +1 yearly prestige
7) +10% morale of armies
Ambition: -1 global unrest

Next is Kamchadal ideas. The first thing to note is that I think the tag should be renamed "Itelmen" or "Itelmens", as Kamchadals were natives of Kamchatka who assimilated into Russian culture, or mixed blood settlers of the peninsula.

Traditions:
+20% global sailors
+15% movement speed
1) +1 yearly legitimacy
2) +10% goods produced
3) +1 land leader shock
4) +15% defensiveness
5) +10% global manpower
6) -10% build cost
7) +10% global trade power
Ambition: +1 admiral maneuver

Next is Khodynt ideas. I labelled the set 'Yukaghir' instead as this set works for any Yukaghir tag, but it's unlikely a 2nd yukaghir tag would ever be introduced.

Traditions:
+10% production efficiency
+1 hostile attrition
1) -10% stability cost, +50% female advisor chance
2) +1 land leader shock
3) +1 tolerance of the true faith, -0.1 yearly corruption
4) -15% land attrition
5) -25% unjustified demands
6) +10% global trade power
7) +5% trade efficiency, +1 land leader maneuver
Ambition: +10% morale of armies

Orochoni ideas, another militarily oriented idea set. If they do not deserve their own set, make them use Nanai ideas.

Traditions:
+1 yearly legitimacy
+1 hostile attrition
1) +10% production efficiency
2) +10% infantry combat ability
3) +10% shock damage
4) +1 land leader maneuver, +1 admiral maneuver
5) +1 yearly prestige
6) +15% movement speed
7) +10% land morale
Ambition: +20% manpower modifier

Xibe ideas. Now I just realized I misspelled the tag as Xibe when it should have been Sibe. Oops. If this tag doesn't deserve it's own set, make them use Jurchen ideas. This tag should also start as a vassal of Korchin, ideally. Culture Conversion might be an odd pick, so if you do not want that, give Sibe -10% land attrition, the same as Jurchen's ambition.

Traditions:
+10% defensiveness
+15% fire damage
1) +10% cavalry combat ability
2) +50% chance of new heir
3) -10% idea cost
4) +5% discipline
5) +15% movement speed
6) +20% improve relations
7) -10% development cost
Ambition: -20% culture conversion cost

Coded NI's are attached, with localization.

Siberian Clan Council definetly need some sort of mechanic to stand out and make it not so flavorless and static, in my opinion.

The first potential mechanic you can use is reusing the Parliament mechanic, relocalized as the "Council of Elders". Ideally, seats would be localized as "Tribes" or "villages", but idk if that's possible. Unique debates would be ideal, but not 100% needed. Based loosely off the Ainu carange, although something similar happened among various different groups: "Disputes between kotan (settlements) were decided on the merits in open discussions called carange, to prevent the disputes from escalating into violence. The debates took place in casi, or fortified compounds. In addition to this, the custom of saimon or "trial by ordeal" remained strong, and the outcome of such ordeals constituted a pact to settle a matter."

The second idea is to use Factions, unique to Siberian Clan Councils, as these tend to be the default for estate-less tags. The factions were made via generalizations of the most important forces in Siberian societies. Note that these are kinda 'draft' versions, any feedback on these would be helpful.

Shamans - +1 tolerance of the true faith, -10% idea cost. -2.5% discipline - Influence Increases when at positive stability
Clan Leaders/Clans - +15% improve relations, +1 diplomatic upkeep, +0.15 monthly autonomy - Influence increases when establishing Alliances or Royal Marriages
War Leaders/Warriors - +10% national manpower, +0.5 yearly army tradition, -10% improve relations - Influence increases when at war

Nanai and Orochoni should start off as Siberian Clan Councils instead of Hordes imo, their structure aligned much more with their northern neighbors than their southern ones.
Haixi and Jianzhou can also start as Tribal Federations rather than hordes as well, but that's a whole different tangent.

The religious mechanics and events for Tengri feel made for hordes, neglecting the fact that Siberian shamanism is lumped in as well.

The first thing I would do is to make Ainu start off Tengri, rather than Animist. This may look weird, but if Siberian shamanism is represented as Tengri, and if Nivkh is Tengri, there is no reason for Ainu to stay animist.

The second thing is that the Siberian Clan Councils should start with Totemism or animism as a syncretic faith, rather than the 'No Syncretic Faith', as the beliefs of Siberians often have overlaps in North America, and often had animal worship as well.

The third thing is that flavor events should exist referencing certain ceremonies popular to certain ethnic groups in Siberia. These can be either tied to the culture or the religion, personally I would tie them to the religion but it's up to you. A notable example of a must-have flavor event include the Bear Festival for Ainu and Nivkh, but there are many others, in particular referencing the shaman's ceremonies and rituals.

Although any tag additions must be done in a conservative manner, some (minor) tags have been added in 1.32 (like Wadai) and soon enough, in 1.34 (So far, Latgalia), showing the doors for new tag additions are not closed just yet. This gives me hope that Siberia can hopefully recieve some new tags. So here are some tags that Siberia and it's vicinity can use.

1) Buryatia (revived) - Have no idea why this tag was removed, removing it was unecessary imo. So I would give them the provinces of, Ude, Barguzin Irkutsk and Ust-Kut, with Chara being owned by Solon. Even without the gold mine, a Buryatia tag is quite necessary and imo worth readding again. Note that the Buryat culture should be in the Altaic culture group with their Mongolic brethren, and be a Horde rather than a Siberian Clan Council.
2) Sakha - Out of all the peoples in the middle of Siberia, the Yakuts or Sakha are by far the most relevant, and would make for an interesting addition. This thread already has many ideas for what a Sakha tag would look like, and they are unique enough imo to recieve their own idea set.
1654359510229.png
Possible flag for Sakha, the modern flag of the Sakha Republic.
3) Skewbald Horde
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skewbald_Horde - owns Tomsk, Ket, Agan and Vah. Could start off as a Horde rather than a Siberian Clan Council. Would have Samoyed primary culture. Ideally Selkup gets its own culture, but Samoyed works too i guess.
1654359706702.png
Selkup ethnic flag, what I would use for a skewbald horde tag
4/5/6/7) Konda,Pelym,Belogorje,Lyapin
These 4 tags are all in the Yugra region, and were documented by the Russians. These tags would be all Ostyak culture, and would likely share one or two national idea sets (Khanty vs Mansi) among them. Pelym would own Pelym and Tura, Konda would own Ostyaki, As and possibly Sibir, Belogorje would own Surgut and Yugan, and Lyapin would own Komi, Obdorsk and Berezov. (First province listed is the capital)
As for flags,I would use these:
1654360169441.png
Lyapin (actually Obdorsk's symbol, but Obdorsk's kingdom is absorbed into Lyapin in this setup)
1654360331108.png
Konda
1654360388240.png
Pelym
1654360469747.png
Belogorye
8/9) Khakas/Yenisei Kyrgyz, Altai
The land of Kyrgyz culture given to Oirat in the Manchuria update should be in fact be not owned by Oirat directly, instead owned by new states, tributaries of Oirat; Altai and Yenisei Kyrgyz (Tuva/Uriankhai is a potential 3rd option, but am unsure.)

Yenisei Kyrgyz should own Pegaya Orda, Kuznetsk and Sayan, Altai should own Altai Uriankhai, Barnaul and Imakia, and Tuva should own Tannu Uriankhai and Khovsgol. All likely hordes rather than Siberian Clan Councils. All 3 can have different NI's, or Tuva and Altai can share.
1654394773099.png
Altai flag (Altai Republic flag)
1654394832257.png
Khakas people flag, what I would use for the Yenisei Kyrgyz
1654394932277.png
Tuva's flag

Will research and come up with the Yakut, Selkup, Khanty and Mansi NI's later down the line (will post them in replies or/and edits when I am done), but for now here is the plans for Buryat, Yenisei Kyrgyz and Tuvan ideas (modsiberia2ideas)
 

Attachments

  • 000_mod_siberianideas_1.txt
    4,5 KB · Views: 0
  • mod_siberianideas_l_english.txt
    13,3 KB · Views: 0
  • 000_mod_siberia2ideas.txt
    1,9 KB · Views: 0
  • 000_mod_siberia2.txt
    6,9 KB · Views: 0
Last edited:
  • 12Like
  • 6
  • 2
  • 2
Reactions:
Made a rough sketch of a map for Eastern Siberia
Pe-Bay, Somatu are the Enets tribes. Tavgi and Piasida - Nganasans, Ket is Ket, Vanyadyr, Turukhan, Olen, Barguzin, Vitim, Vilyuy, Lena, Aldan - Evenks, Lamut - Evens.
The Evenks occupy vast tracts of land and their provinces are named after the rivers that their neighbors used to designate them. I made an exception for Vanyadyr - the name of the tribe was used, Barguzin - this is Barguzin-Tukhum - this is not the name of the river, but the historical name of the land.
Aldan can be made an Even tribe.
Teleuts, Buryats, then the Yenisei Kyrgyz will become vassals of the Oirat state. The Buryats are represented by the Bulagat and Ekhirit families, who lived in the western part of Baikal.
Then the Buryats must attack the Sakha to force them to raft down the Lena River towards the Tuymaada Valley in the center of the Lena River.
The Yenisei Kyrgyz among their tributaries have a part of the tribes of Kets and Southern Samoyeds.
The Teleuts will probably receive iron products from the inhabitants of Shoria as a tribute.

East Siberia— копия.jpg
 
Last edited:
  • 1
Reactions:
I thought about locating Tuva somewhere. It turns out to be Tannu-Uranchai. Therefore, the Oirats and Buryats will have to make room. The Oirats consisted of 4 tribes during the period of great power.

Clip2Net Menu_2022-07-31_22_52_25.png
 

Attachments

  • 20220731163450_1 — копия.jpg
    20220731163450_1 — копия.jpg
    2,3 MB · Views: 0
  • 1
Reactions:
Made a rough sketch of a map for Eastern Siberia
Pe-Bay, Somatu are the Enets tribes. Tavgi and Piasida - Nganasans, Ket is Ket, Vanyadyr, Turukhan, Olen, Barguzin, Vitim, Vilyuy, Lena, Aldan - Evenks, Lamut - Evens.
The Evenks occupy vast tracts of land and their provinces are named after the rivers that their neighbors used to designate them. I made an exception for Vanyadyr - the name of the tribe was used, Barguzin - this is Barguzin-Tukhum - this is not the name of the river, but the historical name of the land.
Aldan can be made an Even tribe.
Teleuts, Buryats, then the Yenisei Kyrgyz will become vassals of the Oirat state. The Buryats are represented by the Bulagat and Ekhirit families, who lived in the western part of Baikal.
Then the Buryats must attack the Sakha to force them to raft down the Lena River towards the Tuymaada Valley in the center of the Lena River.
The Yenisei Kyrgyz among their tributaries have a part of the tribes of Kets and Southern Samoyeds.
The Teleuts will probably receive iron products from the inhabitants of Shoria as a tribute.

View attachment 864875
Interesting stuff. Was always thinking on what to do for the Evenki tribes in Central Siberia. Didnt know they could be split into multiple tags. Also I see some sources saying Sakha lived West of Baikal in 1444 and some that already say they were on the Lena by this point, am not sure where to place them. And if the Evenks were split into 6-7 tags, why are the Yukaghirs kept as one?

As for the Enets and Nganasan tribes, am not sure if they can be added, even in my mod. The area is mostly wasteland right now and the Taymyr peninsula is cut off in-game,

Also I am skeptical on your Evenki 'Barguzin' tag; dont the Daurs, Khamnigan and Barga all live in that area?
I thought about locating Tuva somewhere. It turns out to be Tannu-Uranchai. Therefore, the Oirats and Buryats will have to make room. The Oirats consisted of 4 tribes during the period of great power.

View attachment 864911

And what's up with Buryatia in Uliastai? that seems wayy too far fetched imo
 
Made a rough sketch of the map. Bashkortostan occupied too large an area.
To the east of Bashkortostan are the Sebers (Siberian Tatars), as they call themselves. Piebald Horde - Khanty (in Old Russian - Ostyaks) with a center in Narym. Parabel - Selkups (in Old Russian - Ostyaks). Pechora, Obdoria, Kazym - Nenets (in old Russian - Samoyeds), Kazym are forest Nenets. Pelym - Mansi (in Old Russian - Yugra or Voguly), part of which is located to the west of the Ural Mountains.

View attachment 864860
I thought Piebald Horde was the Selkups, and shouldn't Yugra be like 10 kingdoms?
 
  • 1
Reactions:
Interesting stuff. Was always thinking on what to do for the Evenki tribes in Central Siberia. Didnt know they could be split into multiple tags. Also I see some sources saying Sakha lived West of Baikal in 1444 and some that already say they were on the Lena by this point, am not sure where to place them. And if the Evenks were split into 6-7 tags, why are the Yukaghirs kept as one?
I can say that I have united the Evenk tribes, which are always at war with each other. I made an association for the basins of large rivers. Since ancient times, these places were designated as follows: If the Sakha colonized the banks of the Vilyuy River, then they were designated by the Vilyuy Sakha. If the Evenks lived there, then the Vilyuy Tungus. Despite the fact that within themselves they were divided into several tribes among the Tungus and several uluses among the Sakha.
With the Yukaghirs, it is impossible, in my opinion, to classify them by rivers. The Yukaghirs are generally an ancient people and differed much from each other, at least they distinguish 2 languages: North Yukaghir and South Yukaghir, and their separation seems to have happened back in the Neolithic. Unlike the Yukagirs, the Evenks and Evens are quite young peoples who colonized Eastern Siberia in the X century, that is, shortly before the arrival of the Sakha.
Also in the game there is a Yukaghir tribe with its real name, and not a territorial one, Khodynts. In general, for the Yukaghirs and the Eskimos, it seems to me that it took more effort than unification on a territorial basis.

As for the Enets and Nganasan tribes, am not sure if they can be added, even in my mod. The area is mostly wasteland right now and the Taymyr peninsula is cut off in-game,
What a pity

Also I am skeptical on your Evenki 'Barguzin' tag; dont the Daurs, Khamnigan and Barga all live in that area?
Well, there is such a situation, there Barguzin is mostly covered with taiga, and in the south there is a slight advance of the steppe to the north. The Mongols and their subdivision Buryats are mostly people with a nomadic steppe culture.
Pure Khalkha Mongols lived there, that is, they calmly moved across the border either to the north or to the south between Russia and the Qing Empire and did not consider themselves to be some special tribe. I read historical notes about this, about the so-called Buryat Transbaikal clan Horo. And the fact that later a fairly large Buryat population formed there coincides with the time of Victoria III. These Mongols became Russified and quite late began to classify themselves as Buryats.
I took a quick look at Hamnigan on Wikipedia. It says that in the XVII century they lived in Central Mongolia.
About Barga there is only a mention in the legends that they once lived in Transbaikalia. By the time the Russians arrived, they were not in Barguzin, they lived in Mongolia.
The Daurs lived to the east. This is the province of Solon, which was called Dauria. The Daur did indeed have a slightly different culture than the rest of the Mongols. They may have lived in the taiga and they have dialectal differences with the Mongolian language. For some reason, they are considered the descendants of the Khitans.

This map is made by the Chinese. Steppe spaces are marked in yellow.



And what's up with Buryatia in Uliastai? that seems wayy too far fetched imo
We do not live in an information vacuum. There were pioneers, European travelers who described the life and legends of the peoples. So there was such a German traveler-ethnographer Gerhard Friedrich Müller https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gerhard_Friedrich_Müller, who described the origin of the Buryats.
There is a tradition among the Buryats that in ancient times they were onepeople with the Kalmyks [of the genus] Ölöt. They say Ölöt and Burjät were twobrothers who quarreled over a mare that each of themwanted to take for himself; then Buryat with his ulus turned to flight and sowed in the area of Angara.
Gerhard Friedrich Müller writes about the resettlement of the Sakha:
The Yakuts have a legend that in ancient times they lived together with the Buryats and Mongols and were driven out by the latter from their former place of residence through war. After that, they and their cattle boarded rafts in the upper reaches of the Lena River and / / settled in the region of Olekma and Yakutsk, from where they then settled in other areas.
Nicolaes Witsen https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nicolaes_Witsen:
For a long time lived near Yakutsk, in the forests, several people of foreigners who came from Kazimot. They are called Kazimorintsy, in addition, there are quite a large number of Yakuts who settled near Korata, so they lived together. They attacked the Buryats and stole their livestock and household belongings, so the Buryats gathered, attacked them and killed many and took them into slavery. The Yakuts then fled, abandoned their dwellings and settled at the sources of the Lena, after which they went down the river in boats to the Tungus region, where they built permanent dwellings in the steppes, while the Tungus themselves remained to live in the forests. And this happened more than centuries ago.
Lindenau Jacob Johann https://relstud-hist.spbu.ru/en/articles/en-lindenau-akob-iogann-akov-ivanovic
Look how many generations passed before the Russians came to Yakutia in the 1630s, when Tygyn, whom Lindenau recorded as Tugin, dominated the Sakha.
As for the settlement of the Yakuts, I found confirmation of this during my trip on September 26, 1743 to Lake Dalai, or Baikal. The Yakuts had their settlements on the elevated right bank of the river. Lena, below the village of Kacheg. This place is called by the Russians Yakutsky Vzvoz, and by the Yakuts and Buryats Koboliur. In the Yakut language, this word means "he scolds" or "shouts at me"; in the Buryat language this word has no meaning.
It was said above that 8 clans of the Yakuts were distributed near Lake Dalai and further in the nearby steppes, and they dealt with the Kyrgyz or, as some say, with the Mongals. The leader was Antantiiik, followed by his son Toyon Badschei (Badschir - large intestine). But since they were very weak and could not resist their enemies, the Badschei Toyon went with all the clans from the so-called Mount Koboliur down the Lena. This message is also confirmed by the Buryats. Toion Badschei arrived where the city of Yakutsk was later built, settled there, and settled his other relatives in various places.
The toyon had four wives. The first wife was called Kangalas, by her he had a son, Mundschan. This one, after the death of his father, took his place. Mundschan took three wives for himself, namely: Djergan, Bologoi, and the third was from the Menga clan. From Djergan he had two sons - Kadschaga and Dedudor from Bologoi - four sons - Kugdscha, Tumerei, Itakan and Oko, and from the third he had a son named Tugin. After the death of Toyon Mundschan, his place was taken by Tugin, who received the title - Toyon - Usa - the clan of masters.

This map was made by the Soviet scientist Dolgikh. On the map, the Mongol-speaking tribes of the XVII century are marked in dark orange, and the Evenk tribes are marked in light green. Initially, only the Bulagat and Ekhirit families were called Buryats. They lived near Irkutsk in the XVII century, where Sakha used to live.
The Mongol-speaking tribes Khoro and Tabunut, located southeast of Lake Baikal, belong purely to the Khalkha-Mongols.

Clip2Net Menu_2022-08-01_15_27_07.png


Of course, modern pseudo-historians like to make their people ancient, they think that they have been living there for millions of years. Yakut scientists even prove that they evolved from monkeys in the current territory of Yakutia. This is the so-called Diring Yuryakh culture
 
I thought about locating Tuva somewhere. It turns out to be Tannu-Uranchai. Therefore, the Oirats and Buryats will have to make room. The Oirats consisted of 4 tribes during the period of great power.

View attachment 864911
When would you want them to spawn. After Nuranachi's death if you haven't taken northern china? Would they be released as vassals or declare independence wars day 1 or be tribs?
Made a rough sketch of a map for Eastern Siberia
Pe-Bay, Somatu are the Enets tribes. Tavgi and Piasida - Nganasans, Ket is Ket, Vanyadyr, Turukhan, Olen, Barguzin, Vitim, Vilyuy, Lena, Aldan - Evenks, Lamut - Evens.
The Evenks occupy vast tracts of land and their provinces are named after the rivers that their neighbors used to designate them. I made an exception for Vanyadyr - the name of the tribe was used, Barguzin - this is Barguzin-Tukhum - this is not the name of the river, but the historical name of the land.
Aldan can be made an Even tribe.
Teleuts, Buryats, then the Yenisei Kyrgyz will become vassals of the Oirat state. The Buryats are represented by the Bulagat and Ekhirit families, who lived in the western part of Baikal.
Then the Buryats must attack the Sakha to force them to raft down the Lena River towards the Tuymaada Valley in the center of the Lena River.
The Yenisei Kyrgyz among their tributaries have a part of the tribes of Kets and Southern Samoyeds.
The Teleuts will probably receive iron products from the inhabitants of Shoria as a tribute.

View attachment 864875
Whats with barguzin where Buryatia used to be. Would you want continous borders through all of these? As if so then you're effectively removing Russia's Siberian Frontiers. How much dev would you want to be seeing for these tags
 
When would you want them to spawn. After Nuranachi's death if you haven't taken northern china? Would they be released as vassals or declare independence wars day 1 or be tribs?
Let the Teleuts, Tuva, Buryatia, and 4 Oirat tribes be united at the beginning of the game. Then they were ruled by Esen-taishi, who defeated China.
But after Esen-taishi, the Eastern Mongols inflicted a serious defeat on the Oirat alliance. The Oirats often quarreled among themselves. Therefore, 2 tribes of Torgouds and Derbets migrate to the west, to the North Caucasus, and Khoshuts will go to Tibet, where they will create their own state.

Whats with barguzin where Buryatia used to be. Would you want continous borders through all of these? As if so then you're effectively removing Russia's Siberian Frontiers. How much dev would you want to be seeing for these tags

The Buryats were part of the Oirat Union. Buryat and Kalmyk cultures are very close, one culture, one language.
 
I thought Piebald Horde was the Selkups, and shouldn't Yugra be like 10 kingdoms?
Perhaps later Yugra will become a conglomeration of 10 kingdoms, of which Konda will be extremely pro-Russian, they will be watchdogs of Russian colonists. But in the XV century, we only know about the strong principality Pelym, and its leader Asyka, who slowed down the expansion of Muscovy

Система_уральских_княжеств_на_карте_Сибирского_ханства_16_век.jpg


But if you make the Piebald Horde with the center in Narym, then you leave no room for the Khanty ruler
 
I wouldn't want new tags but more flavor for the government reform and giving an identity to the countries that are there would be a good addition.
 
  • 1Like
Reactions:
Make the Evenk shooters accurate. There are records that the best Evenk warriors and hunters shot down the first arrow with the second arrow. They roamed with deer.
Lamuts - Evens. Lamu - from the Evenki word sea. The Russians called them foot Tungus. They are mostly settled people and fishermen. Kamchatka and the Yukagirs seem to have lived in the Stone Age.
The most well-aimed shooters are the Evenks, in second place are the Jurchens (Manchus), in third place are the Mongols and Turks.
 
  • 1
Reactions:
I can say that I have united the Evenk tribes, which are always at war with each other. I made an association for the basins of large rivers. Since ancient times, these places were designated as follows: If the Sakha colonized the banks of the Vilyuy River, then they were designated by the Vilyuy Sakha. If the Evenks lived there, then the Vilyuy Tungus. Despite the fact that within themselves they were divided into several tribes among the Tungus and several uluses among the Sakha.
With the Yukaghirs, it is impossible, in my opinion, to classify them by rivers. The Yukaghirs are generally an ancient people and differed much from each other, at least they distinguish 2 languages: North Yukaghir and South Yukaghir, and their separation seems to have happened back in the Neolithic. Unlike the Yukagirs, the Evenks and Evens are quite young peoples who colonized Eastern Siberia in the X century, that is, shortly before the arrival of the Sakha.
Also in the game there is a Yukaghir tribe with its real name, and not a territorial one, Khodynts. In general, for the Yukaghirs and the Eskimos, it seems to me that it took more effort than unification on a territorial basis.
Well I guess naming the Evenk tags after river systems can work. An alternative is to use the most influential/strongest/most well-recorded tribe to be the name of the tags, or possibly using the evenki name for the river (Are the names of the rivers not derived from Evenki?)


As for the Buryat and Sakha legends, you did not say if they happened pre-1444 or post-1444. If this was post-1444, then Buryatia goes in Central Mongolia and Sakha goes around Irkutsk/Kachug. If these were pre-1444, Buryatia and Sakha would more or less be in their modern-ish places. Also the Barga legend has the same deal, maybe they only moved into Mongolia post-1444 and same with khamnigan.
 
Well I guess naming the Evenk tags after river systems can work. An alternative is to use the most influential/strongest/most well-recorded tribe to be the name of the tags, or possibly using the evenki name for the river (Are the names of the rivers not derived from Evenki?)
These river system names are neither Yakut nor Russian. It is possible that these names are Evens and possibly ancient tribes assimilated by the Evens. In ancient times, these areas were called by the names of these rivers. I think this is a temporary alternative. Because they created the same large provinces of Solon, where the Daurian and Tungus tribes lived in the neighborhood. Also, the Jurchens, united into large provinces, were in fact divided into small possessions, and the Ming empire deliberately did not allow them to unite, the policy of "divide and rule."

As for the Buryat and Sakha legends, you did not say if they happened pre-1444 or post-1444. If this was post-1444, then Buryatia goes in Central Mongolia and Sakha goes around Irkutsk/Kachug. If these were pre-1444, Buryatia and Sakha would more or less be in their modern-ish places.
Yes, I tried to reconstruct the location of the Sakha and Buryats in the XV century, that is, by 1444. There are no written sources. But there are indications of European travelers in about 200 years. There are also archaeological finds of Turkic warriors in the Yakutsk region of the XVI century; no older ones are found.

Also the Barga legend has the same deal, maybe they only moved into Mongolia post-1444 and same with khamnigan.

Judging by the map of Dolgikh, the Mongols were located near the Selenga River, where there was a slight expansion of the steppe to the north. All taiga lands are the patrimony of the Evenks, who did not want to share their lands with them at all. There were cases when the Evenks killed the sleeping Mongols with a night attack. To the south of Lake Baikal there is also an Evenk tribe Kumkoghir.
Why should the Mongols of the steppes climb into the taiga jungle, where cobwebs envelop their faces, where the air is filled with clouds of mosquitoes, midges and horseflies, where cows will suffer from gadfly? They are nomads, if they want, they will migrate to the Selenga valley, and if the land begins to deplete due to grazing, they will migrate back to the lands of Onon and Kerulen

Clip2Net Menu_2022-08-02_15_31_11.png
 
There may be a question about the name of the Lena River, because it is the same as the female name Lena.
Here is an excerpt from Wikipedia: In 1619-1628, the explorer Pyanda first recorded the name of this river in the form of Elyuene, which in Russian usage was fixed as Lena. It is believed that the name of the river comes from the Evenki language, in which the name of the river "Elu-Yene" ("Eluene", "Line") is derived from "Yene" - "Big river".
 
Forest of Transbaikalia, Chita region. A good place for hunters, it is likely that individual Mongolian hunters could go there to hunt.


Sakha, when they moved near Yakutsk, they started fires to cut down forests so that cows and horses could graze there. And now the land near Yakutsk has turned into a steppe. The Sakha could also drain small lakes by digging channels to increase pastures. But that was later, in the XIX century.

I propose to do it for the Siberian peoples, the discoverers-scouts-single warriors who will explore unknown lands. The legends say how the Yukaghir warriors pursued such Yakut scouts.
It is possible that Sakha needs a unique technology that allows them to sail along the Lena River on rafts when they lose to strong nations. So that the whole tribe and cattle could fit on the rafts. The land route will be very difficult and along the way the cattle may die or they will be ruined by the Evenks.
 
Forest of Transbaikalia, Chita region. A good place for hunters, it is likely that individual Mongolian hunters could go there to hunt.


Sakha, when they moved near Yakutsk, they started fires to cut down forests so that cows and horses could graze there. And now the land near Yakutsk has turned into a steppe. The Sakha could also drain small lakes by digging channels to increase pastures. But that was later, in the XIX century.

I propose to do it for the Siberian peoples, the discoverers-scouts-single warriors who will explore unknown lands. The legends say how the Yukaghir warriors pursued such Yakut scouts.
It is possible that Sakha needs a unique technology that allows them to sail along the Lena River on rafts when they lose to strong nations. So that the whole tribe and cattle could fit on the rafts. The land route will be very difficult and along the way the cattle may die or they will be ruined by the Evenks.
This is actually interesting.

Sadly river sailing is not a thing in-game, as much as I know about the tale of all the yakuts sailing up the Lena, i doubt river sailing would be added in-game, Possibly an event to move them to the Lena?

As for the first part, the Sakha turning the forest around Yakutsk into a steppe is actually very interesting. I would go as far as to make the province containing Yakutsk start as a steppe (terrain cant change mid-game in eu4 sadly) to represent this.
 
Sadly river sailing is not a thing in-game, as much as I know about the tale of all the yakuts sailing up the Lena, i doubt river sailing would be added in-game, Possibly an event to move them to the Lena?

As for the first part, the Sakha turning the forest around Yakutsk into a steppe is actually very interesting. I would go as far as to make the province containing Yakutsk start as a steppe (terrain can't change mid-game in eu4 sadly) to represent this.
It's a pity. I hope that the developers will take into account when creating EU V changing terrain, freezing of rivers, ice drifts for several months when rivers become impassable, floods, droughts, terraforming, soil depletion, changes in demographics and the resulting impoverishment, depletion of furs. After all, these are the basic needs of the then society, on which the duration of states depended.
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
The archaeological culture that was discovered in the Kachug settlement in the Irkutsk region in the XIV-XV centuries was called the Ust-Talkinsk culture, which is early Yakut, that is, it is no different. The European discoverers were right, and not modern folk historians, who seek to make the arrival of the Sakha ancient or to prove the autochthonous nature of the Sakha.

Nomadic Empires of Eurasia in Archaeological and Interdisciplinary Studies: volume of the IV International Congress of Medieval Archeology of the Eurasian Steppes, dedicated to the 100th Anniversary of the Russian Academic Archeology (Ulan-Ude, September 16–21, 2019). In 2 vol. Vol. 2 / ed. by B. V. Bazarov, N. N. Kradin. – Ulan-Ude: Publishing House of BSC SB RAS, 2019. – 182 p.https://www.academia.edu/40905022/С...якутских_материалов_XIV_XVIII_вв_COMPARATIVE_ANALYSIS_AND_CORRELATION_OF_MATERIALS_OF_UST_TALKIN_CULTURE_AND_YAKUT_MATERIALS_OF_XIV_XVIII_CENTURIES

Clear parallels between the Ust-Talkinsk and early Yakut cultures appeared after the discoveries Sergelyakh burial of the XV century. in Central Yakutia (Bravina et al. 2016) and Bului burials the same period (XIV-XVI centuries) in the upper reaches of the Lena (Kachugsky district of the Irkutsk region), studied by us together with Irkutsk archaeologists under the leadership of V.S. Nikolaev in 2013. In the Buluysky burial, the deceased elderly man was laid with his head on a saddle, the iron loops of the torok of which are completely similar to those from the Yakut samples, the stirrups are identical to the Sergelyakh ones, the arrowheads have direct analogies in materials from Yakutia, and even the bone lining of the bow indicate that the Ust-Talkinsk and Yakuts had complex bows, identical in technology and the principle of their manufacture. Thus, a direct connection between the monuments of the late Middle Ages in Central Yakutia and the burial complexes of the Upper Lena steppe and forest-steppe areas of the Cis-Baikal region in this regard is undeniable.
 
After all, I was mistaken, because I warned that my map would be rough, that is, approximate, not very accurate. The province of Vitim should be renamed Ilim, where the Russian fortress of Ilimsk will be built. Because the Vitim river is located in the north of Barguzin.