Free investiture? That is not a wise choice, my good king. Yet, perhaps, with the low standing this Pope seems to have, it might work. For a while.
Eadward continues to add enemies to his tally, I note. And perhaps let himself be led my counsel he finds agreeable. I would not say he is in his dotage - but I would say some of his decisions have not been as sharp as of late.
I think that is right - secure in his position his instincts for potential dangers has gotten out of practice, as it were. The blade of his mind not so sharpened by the whetstone of experience, as it were.I'd say he is less old and more drunk on power and success. His bold actions have not drawn much consequence - the worst of them, imprisoning his grandson, drew the ire of many but no real punishment beyond a somewhat brief falling out with his son. Otherwise, he's been able to murder with impunity, reshape the realm largely as he sees fit. And of course his boldest act, actually seizing the realm from his nephew, was mostly consequence free, even from his family!
Suffice to say, Eadward at some level probably thinks he can do no wrong. The pushback has been mild. Sure challenging the pope is something else entirely, but when it comes down to it, he's done far more reckless things than free investiture. So I'm not shocked a king who has plotted, schemed and murdered to solidify his control over the realm would also look to take control of the clergy within its shores as well.
I think there is more accurate truism below but I will agree that Eadward is showing some signs of age and certainly preferential treatment to those that are in agreement with him (see Berold vs. Harold.)Eadward continues to add enemies to his tally, I note. And perhaps let himself be led my counsel he finds agreeable. I would not say he is in his dotage - but I would say some of his decisions have not been as sharp as of late.
I am curious why it might be a bad decision unless you really want the Pope's favor. I have spent a good deal of time trying to keep relations with my bishops high so I get full tax value and free investiture looked like it might assist that. You and other more experienced players - please tell me what the pitfalls are. Eadward is indeed getting bold with these recent changes and maybe all of them are not wise.Free investiture? That is not a wise choice, my good king. Yet, perhaps, with the low standing this Pope seems to have, it might work. For a while.
I believe that this is a more accurate consideration of Eadward's recent actions. I mean, even with the tyranny hit, the King does not seem to see too much trouble outside of his nephew Eadweald and even that has been quiet of late. That may change going forward but for the moment, Eadward is feeling very strong and indeed, as if he can do no wrong.I'd say he is less old and more drunk on power and success. His bold actions have not drawn much consequence - the worst of them, imprisoning his grandson, drew the ire of many but no real punishment beyond a somewhat brief falling out with his son. Otherwise, he's been able to murder with impunity, reshape the realm largely as he sees fit. And of course his boldest act, actually seizing the realm from his nephew, was mostly consequence free, even from his family!
Suffice to say, Eadward at some level probably thinks he can do no wrong. The pushback has been mild. Sure challenging the pope is something else entirely, but when it comes down to it, he's done far more reckless things than free investiture. So I'm not shocked a king who has plotted, schemed and murdered to solidify his control over the realm would also look to take control of the clergy within its shores as well.
I think his mind is still sharp but not necessarily giving much care to potential dangers. The King is feeling strong right now and without pushback, he will continue to make such choices. It is somewhat ironic that he is the bold King here rather than Uhtræd as the older brother never pushed such things. Then again, Uhtræd was less secure on the throne and had his illness to deal with in his later years.I think that is right - secure in his position his instincts for potential dangers has gotten out of practice, as it were. The blade of his mind not so sharpened by the whetstone of experience, as it were.
I liked the scene too. As a very raw player, I too would be interested in why some think it a dangerous or even ill-advised move. It seems to be one that plays better at home than in Rome - and rather in keeping with English history, too. Is it that the likely trouble with antagonising the Pope is worse than the local relationship benefit and discretion of free investiture?
No doubt this could trouble Æthelric's reign when the time comes. For Eadward, he is going all out to make the realm to his desire.So the king goes for Free investiture. A well done scene to express what in the game is a rather mundane action.
Usually the only downside I have seen with it is that when a new king takes over the Pope will demand that you get rid of it or make a donation.
I agree that it was in my thinking that it would fit with the RL England of this time. Plus, the local effect was more important to me than the Pope, which may or may not come back to bite Eadward.I liked the scene too. As a very raw player, I too would be interested in why some think it a dangerous or even ill-advised move. It seems to be one that plays better at home than in Rome - and rather in keeping with English history, too. Is it that the likely trouble with antagonising the Pope is worse than the local relationship benefit and discretion of free investiture?
I will likely never have the chance to control the papacy so it was indeed what seemed best for England. Frankly, no one else seems to have issue with these changes as both the city tax law and this were rather quickly affirmed by the Lords.Its the defualt move to make if you are a christian nation and you don't own the papacy yet. Hence why Galahad removed the pope from picking his bishops but later on I bring them back in because I take over the while system.
Basically, if you do not have complete control over the pope such that you cab cancel and abort all his action, remove his influence from your realm. If you have him as a vassal, keep him as a direct vassal beneath you and keep him on a short leash. Suffice to say is that its a negative opinion modifier and if you have a twitchy pope or a sinful ruler...bad things may happen.
(We will cover this eventually in Albion. I've realised as other games went on that having an empire like that means you can serve as a guide to literally every adavnced option in the game.)
I wanted to tread a fine line there with him being bitter at not just his poor decision earlier but also that he now feels as though he did wrong towards his father. Still, much of it for him still stems from his religious nature which has always been pious indeed. Perhaps too pious.Oscytel is bitter indeed, perhaps more so that if he had honoured his father's wishes this pass would not be.
I am glad that I decided not to go with him but felt like I still needed to keep his presence. Also, he will play a part coming up.Oscytel dips into some truths which Eadgar is blind to, but to what end? He sees the Devil in every detail and every thing he does not like. A strange character, indeed.
I think that is right but as you say, Oscytel gave up that opportunity long ago. He tries to make Eadgar see the light, but the younger brother is still no0t having any of it (for now.)Oscytel is right, of course, and it makes sense he of all people would be the angriest over free investiture. But he remains rather unlikable, because while his points are valid, he abdicated responsibility and then complains at the result (as Eadgar points out). I get the sense Oscytel would have been a rather ineffective king ala Henry III, but he didn't even get that far.
Evil triumphs when good men do nothing - or something to that nature.
I am really glad they all read as a piece because this was a stretch where I did not feel my writing was as strong for some reason. The scenes just were not coming to me as easily.A magnificent trio of chapters sir! Loved the set up with the Prince and his cohorts and then the scheming Bishop prodding the king towards Free Investiture (that might come back to haunt you-have seen kingdoms put under interdict for such...) and the final scene with the pious and objectionable Oscytel-he might speak some truth but the sanctimonious way he does it is sure to repel all and his brother's reaction speaks volumes
Great stuff-I wont be commenting as often but this is one of a few stories I intend to try and keep pace with
I really had to think when it came to the mix of Godwin and Wessex. Beo and his wife was a success. Eadward and Judith too. In truth, most of these pairings have been successful with some ill effects after the fact. I rather enjoyed going back over the history because by this time, it is long. There are really only three Houses still keeping power - Wessex, Godwin and Normandy. As mentioned in the post, every mixture is a heady brew.Eadric ... needs to learn to cure his ambition.
And he is right - Godwin and Wessex do not always make fine bedfellows, though sometimes - of course - they have.
I do promise that the Eadric thing will play out, though it might be different than how you think it might. However, what I really want to comment upon is your use of the word "banter". A great word and only makes me think of this:Ah, another hungry pike in the pond, that mistakes itself for a bigger fish. Young Eadric will find himself on a hook: whether caught and released or put on a serving plate will depend on his reaction. Some excellent knowing banter tinged by a little raw emotion in that episode. Top form, old chap!
I could have developed a bit more plot here and have Eadric responding to Ada's death by this play, but I decided to leave it a bit more cloudy. He really does not know what happened and surely does not suspect the King in her death. As to using this faction to imprison him and confiscate lands, I'm not sure I was able to do that in the vanilla version. It might have been possible but I did not try. At this time, Eadward's eyes were elsewhere as Berold suggests.There's always some noble who decides to fabricate on the throne. Kent though? Doesn't seem to be much of a threat, especially given the circumstances of the realm at the moment. (The biggest landowner, and his most likely ally, his son, can't join factions for a looong time) Though, I think the king can use that as an excuse to imprison and confiscate his lands without a tyranny penalty?