• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Nice overview of world in 1650s
Thank you. I didn't want to go into too much detail (if only because I can't remember too many details anymore) but also I didn't want to get bogged down. But I did want to provide a foundation going forward.

It's good to get a birds-eye view of the period. In many respects it helps to put many of the goings-on of the original story in context.

EU2 is a game I remember all too well -- back in the days when armies that had to be replenished manually, everything was controlled by billions of sliders, and you never really managed to get the "Falalalan" song entirely out of your head :D
Falalalan was/is great :D

And yes, this did get covered in bits of pieces of the original story, but never all in one place, rather on purpose since Memory was rather tighly told from a particular character's point of view who wouldn't have needed to get most of it explained.
 
I already wondered why a succession game called "In Memory of France" seemed to be so centred around Spain instead of France :p. Nice setup btw.
 
Interesting Premises.
Thank you

I already wondered why a succession game called "In Memory of France" seemed to be so centred around Spain instead of France :p. Nice setup btw.
Oh indeed. Admittedly the protagonist (and arguably the chief antagonist) of In Memory of France are both French, despite almost all the scenes being set in Madrid.
 
History 04 - Establishing the Red Lion
Excerpts from A Brief History of the Red Lion
Chapter 4 - Establishing the Red Lion


Both as a smuggler, and as an officer of the Crown during the English Civil War, Charles Simmonds had established contacts and agents in a number of European ports and cities. Usually these were people who maintained a useful other trade, to give them a reason to be there. Also usually these were his own people, from either his own family or the families of those who served him on his ship. In particular he had a number of other contacts in France, as it was through France that the Spanish had largely funnelled their supplies to the royal. Partly this was a matter of geography, but also as the Spanish wished to remain apparently neutral in the entire affair. Even at this early date Spain was beginning to develop an addiction to English shipbuilding. France, sheltering under the shadow of Spain’s ally Bavaria, had little choice but to agree to this.

Thus it was when the Red Lion sailed into Lisbon - Charles Simmonds went out to open rather than hug the Bay of Biscay to avoid Parliamentarian patrols - he was not entering into an unknown world. At sea though they had encountered a storm, and whilst they had all survived, the Red Lion had sustained a fair degree of damage. Charles Simmonds then agreed to sell the ship, which was broken up for its timbers to be reused. Whilst a highly practical move this also served a symbolic purpose - there was no going back.

Indeed, Charles Simmonds now abandoned the sea entirely, and travelled to Madrid. The exact date of his arrival is uncertain - and the official Red Lion history offers no precise clues - but most think it was sometime in 1648.

This was during the reign of Philip IV - but already Madrid had begun the frenzy of growth and rebuilding that would reach its culminated during the reign of his son. The Red Lion survivors settled in a new distract and set up their own businesses. Central to this was a tavern that Charles Simmonds called The Red Lion. It became a focal point for English exiles in Madrid, but more than that it became the centre of a web of activity, most legal, some not.

Charles Simmonds may have forsaken the sea, but he was still a smuggler at heart. He merely applied his chosen trade to new circumstances. The details of this are hazy, and poorly seen from our point of view more than five centuries in the future, but all agree The Red Lion was the nexus of a criminal empire whose tendrils spread throughout European Spain, France, and even back to England (where, one can assume, Charles Simmonds maintained some secret agents).

However, whilst this is known - and even celebrated in its way - it misses a large point. Most of the businesses that Charles’ companions started were entirely legitimate. It is not even right to say they were fronts for his other endeavours, like the Red Lion tavern was. Yes they operated under his aegis - he was still their Captain, their leader - but they operated largely independently of Charles Simmonds’ own particular endeavours. Thus we see from the beginning of the Red Lion one of the dichotomies that has allowed it to so flourish. Whilst some of every generation would volunteer in the more adventuresome aspects of the family business, most enjoyed a more settled existence. The lines were more blurred at the start, but became more defined in time as we shall relate at the proper time.

However, Charles was not just a publican, or a smuggler. He also became known in one particular trade with which the Red Lion has since become synonymous: information. When he built his tavern he constructed it such a way to provide a number of secure private rooms. Far from the prying eyes of the court these became a convivial place to conduct the sort of deals that rarely see the light of day. The discretion of the Red Lion was assured. By keeping the secrets of others secure, he did not demand payment in coin but in kind. A secret kept meant a secret revealed. He apparently had two rules during this time: he never sided with Court factions, and he never dabbled in treachery against the Spanish crown. The Red Lion thus became something of neutral ground, and offered his other enterprises a certain protection.

Now a question: how did Charles Simmonds have the money to help establish his tavern the businesses of his companions? The district they settled in was new, and almost everything had to be built from scratch, and help pay for the infrastructure works (water and sewers) that were becoming an increasingly prominent part of Madrid. We know he was somewhat wealthy anyway, but it is largely assumed this is what happened to the remnants of the royal treasury that he took with him on his flight from Pendennis. The official history makes no mention of his, and in the absence of any credible alternatives (conspiracies, naturally, abound) it does seem this is the most probable explanation. If so, it was money well spent.
 
Good luck with this my friend! I have no idea really how Stellaris works and have never read an AAR based on it, but that may not matter, I guess! But good to see another @stnylan AAR, no matter the genre! :)
 
Good luck with this my friend! I have no idea really how Stellaris works and have never read an AAR based on it, but that may not matter, I guess! But good to see another @stnylan AAR, no matter the genre! :)
You should check some out, there are some great stories told in the Stellaris section! :) I think all my AARs over the years have been CK, CK2 or Stellaris actually, with all the recent being Stellaris. :eek: It lends itself very well both to lore and world building as well as history book storytelling.

@stnylan : I really need to read In Memory of France, don't I? :D I think I might have begun reading it way back when it was on, but I don't remember anyting. :p
 
Information is certainly a valuable commodity in its own right -- and, in some ways, much easier to trade or to smuggle than more tangible goods. A shrewd and far-sighted man indeed.
Oh Charles Simmonds was always good at adapting and exploiting opportunities.

Good luck with this my friend! I have no idea really how Stellaris works and have never read an AAR based on it, but that may not matter, I guess! But good to see another @stnylan AAR, no matter the genre! :)
Welcome along. Stellaris may yet become your next Paradox timesink :) Like @Nikolai suggests though there are some rather neat tales here.

You should check some out, there are some great stories told in the Stellaris section! :) I think all my AARs over the years have been CK, CK2 or Stellaris actually, with all the recent being Stellaris. :eek: It lends itself very well both to lore and world building as well as history book storytelling.

@stnylan : I really need to read In Memory of France, don't I? :D I think I might have begun reading it way back when it was on, but I don't remember anyting. :p
Reading In Memory of France is absolutely not required - the events of that tale after all take place 500 years before the Stellaris gameplay. Indeed my next post will probably cover the time period of Memory in its entirety. I have covered this initial introductory period in greater detail than I intend to do any other time period because (a) I like writing about beginnings (b) I already did a lot of the backstory in Memory, and (c) it is rather fun to get a chance to show off this backstory that has been stuck in my head for the last 14 years.

That said if anyone does want to read Memory I would, naturally, be delighted. I am still quite happy with it. Indeed, it was @Specialist290 reading it and PMing me about that which prompted the idea that underpins this AAR.
 
History 05 - Of Red Charles and Carlos de Aranda
Excerpts from A Brief History of the Red Lion
Chapter 5 - Of Red Charles and Carlos de Aranda


Charles Simmonds died sometime between 1688 and 1690, according the best estimates we have available. The official Red Lion history has a habit of obscuring precise dates. Two new characters now enter the story, one of the Red Lion, and one not.

Red Charles was the son of Mary, who was Charles Simmond’s daughter. When Charles Simmonds died the leadership of the Red Lion fell to him. His mother - who by all accounts was most formidable - doubtless assisted. There are a handful of descriptions of Red Charles, and they all describe a person of a large and commanding personality. The reason Red Charles took over the Lion is bound up with the fact that Charles Simmond’s son (also called Charles - Charles being a common name amongst the wider clan) was killed in 1682. We know this because of exterior information - it was during the time of the Cook’s Plot, and the general chaos this caused on the streets which masked the last serious conflict between the Red Lion and certain other sections of the Madrid underworld.

The Cook’s Plot is also the first time we can be absolutely sure that Carlos de Aranda and the Red Lion first worked together.

Carlos de Aranda is well known for being the Chancellor who stage-managed the Habsburg succession after the death of King Charles, and who dominated the Spanish political scene for many decades. He started though from - for an aristocrat - relatively humble beginnings. His family was not unimportant, but minor. His father managed to earn his son a place in the service of the Duke of Milan, who was Secretary of the powerful Committee of Europe, by the late 1670s.

The transfer of power from the person of the monarch to the various Committees, a change in large part engendered by King Charles’ situation, was getting somewhat advanced in this time, but what that meant in reality was that competition between the Committees, and the Lords on them, was getting especially intense.

I do not intend to reveal the whole history of the Cook’s Plot, but merely wish to illuminate one item: it was the Duke of Milan who produced the damning evidence, and it was produced for him by Carlos de Aranda. Various sources - not least the Red Lion official history - acknowledge the Red Lion clan assisted de Aranda in his endeavour. Indeed we even have the recorded word of de Aranda himself, who says he began to frequent the tavern in late 1678, partly out of what he describes as a perverse pleasure in English fare, and because it was a useful place. As the Duke of Milan’s agent no doubt the facilities offered by the Red Lion were convenient for the sorts of meetings that he arranged on his master’s behalf.

Why did the Red Lion clan agree to this operation? The official history just repeats the general condemnation the Red Lion have against treason, but whilst I am sure there is a measure of truth in that I believe it to be incomplete. There is scant evidence, naturally, but there is enough to suggest that the conspirators sought to use the Red Lion’s smuggling services in furtherance of their plot. Charles Simmonds - still alive - no doubt saw through this stratagem, and was angry. His two rules - to stay apart from court factions and be not involved with treason - were thus breached. Indeed I think it is suggestive that it was during this time that the Red Lion had its last serious violent brush with the other criminal groups of Madrid, resulting in the death of the younger Charles. If there was one thing liable to make Charles Simmonds angry it was a threat to his family. He oversaw the destruction of his criminal challenger but also - through his son Red Charles - orchestrated the evidence Carlos de Aranda gave to the Duke of Milan that saw the Plot revealed and the guilty caught.

In the process, the Red Lion established a relationship with Carlos de Aranda, and through him with the Duke of Milan, and also put those worthies in their debt.

Which perhaps explains what happens next. In the aftermath of the plot the Duke of Milan was appointed Chancellor by the King, and given a remit to seek to prevent a plot like that ever succeeded again. To do that the Duke needed a network of informants, informants that could not be traced to him.

The Red Lion group, which through marriage and births had increased in numbers, was the avenue. The Red Lion already had interests in several major Imperial cities in Europe, but the next few years saw a veritable diaspora to all parts of the Spanish Empire. We start to get records of Red Lion business springing up not only in Europe, but in the Americas, in Africa, in India, the Spice Islands, and Australia. At the same time the Red Lion created a number of trading ventures that existed on the local exchange, giving them reasons to establish trading agents far and wide.

Charles Simmonds died and Red Charles took over, only now he oversaw a globe-spanning intelligence operation. Closer to home the Red Lion also gave Carlos de Aranda the upper hand in domestic politics. In return the Red Lion gained protection, and most importantly very tangible gratitude.

No doubt the most consequential task the Red Lion carried out for Carlos de Aranda involved the succession of King Charles. The details of this are beyond murky, but it is clear that the Red Lion were more than slightly involved in the various accidents that disrupted the French cause. The end result of this was that Carlos de Aranda became Chancellor of the Spanish Empire. In that role he would make two decisions vital to the future of the Red Lion and integral in the decline of the Spanish Imperial power.
 
We're starting to get into names that I recognize :D

One can immediately see the mutual benefit of such an arrangement -- plausible deniability for the Crown, and royal patronage (however discreet) and access to new markets (for both goods and information) for the Red Lion.

That final note about the "decline of Spanish power" is worrisome, however -- not so much for Spain (empires rise and fall as a matter of course), but for the collateral consequences of their arrangement with the Red Lion, and some of the turbulence they may have to weather in the empire's wake.
 
Intriguing as always... :D I love the story more and more.
 
We're starting to get into names that I recognize :D

One can immediately see the mutual benefit of such an arrangement -- plausible deniability for the Crown, and royal patronage (however discreet) and access to new markets (for both goods and information) for the Red Lion.

That final note about the "decline of Spanish power" is worrisome, however -- not so much for Spain (empires rise and fall as a matter of course), but for the collateral consequences of their arrangement with the Red Lion, and some of the turbulence they may have to weather in the empire's wake.
Yes. Chapter 5 and Chapter 6 actually cover the period of In Memory of France, from Chapter 7 we will start stretching our legs into the future of the Red Lion from that point. And all I will say is that I had quite a lot of fun trying to work out how essentially an organised crime family ends up taking over effective control of the planet.

Intriguing as always... :D I love the story more and more.

Thank you :)
 
History 06 - The French War
Excerpts from A Brief History of the Red Lion
Chapter 6 - The French War


Carlos de Aranda was probably the most knowledgeable Spanish Chancellor for two hundred years. He was something of a polymath, precociously intelligent. His experience was also unusually broad. In the mid-1780s, at the behest of the Duke of Milan, he undertook a five year tour of the Spanish Empire. He sailed up the Mississippi and down the Amazon - he visited Peru and Mexico, California and Brazil, Morocco, South Africa, India and Australia. This gave him an unrivalled practical knowledge of the Spanish Empire, and along the way he formed contacts across the world. All this bore fruit when he became Chancellor, because he had a very clear view of the challenges facing the Spanish Empire.

There were three such challenges. The first was France. De Aranda always maintained an antipathy to the state of France - but not, it should be noted, towards the French people. Indeed his very best friend - and companion on the aforementioned Grand Tour - was none other than Jean de Fontenay, in due course the last Ambassador of France to the Spanish Imperial Court. Before 1700 this antipathy was something quixotic - after all how could the impotent remnants of the French state cause difficulties for France. Especially considering France were effective vassals of Bavaria, and Bavaria - since the 1670s - was increasingly a satellite state of Spain.

The Habsburg Succession changed all that. Whilst the French state existed the Bourbon family would be a threat to the legitimacy of the Emperor Charles. The fact remains that the Habsburg candidate was the weaker candidate, his reign was therefore somewhat illegitimate. Usurpers never rest easily on their thrones, and the Habsburg King was no exception. Whilst Bavaria remained an independent state though there was nothing that could be done. However the Prince-Elector died untimely in 1704, and in accordance with the pre-arranged will Bavaria was joined to the Spanish Empire. Now all it required was a pretext.

It probably says something about the skill of Jean de Fontenay that it took eight years before Carlos de Aranda find his excuse. Ultimately there were limits to what one Ambassador could do to protect such a vainglorious King as Louis XIV. The trigger was in America, where the Spanish had claimed the entire watershed of the Mississippi (though tacitly they accepted this claim did not extend into the westernmost part of the British settlements). From the Hudson Bay settlements a group of Frenchmen constructed a small fort - really little more than a fortified trading post - next to a stream that was a tributary of a minor river than, in due course, joined the mighty Mississippi.

When one is looking for excuses, this was enough.

The war was over swiftly, though not as swiftly as it might have been. A Spanish general in the Americas had not heeded the intelligence about the strength of the French garrison in that distant place, and was ambushed and forced to withdraw, before returning with a more powerful army. In Europe a more surprising turn of events saw one Spanish army virtually annihilated by the French at the Battle of Orleans. Marshall Pierre - the Last Marshall so-called - showed just how devastating a properly generalled artillery train can be. In the long-term it did not matter.
King Louis XIV had gone to ground in a hidden castle in Savoy, and there he was killed. It took some months to confirm this death, but it was done and France became part of the Spanish Crown, ruled through a regent for several decades before being formally integrated just after 1750 - by which time Austria itself had formally become part of the Spanish Empire and the Holy Roman Empire of old was effectively no more.

The French war is an oddity, rarely has a war whose ultimate outcome was never in doubt be so influential. Whilst France existed it dominated his thinking. With its conclusion he was able to concentrate on the other two great challenges facing Spain. One, he determined, he could do very little about. The other, well he did what he thought best.
 
Hmmm, what challenge can that be, I wonder.
 
Quite an interesting tale. Though my inner Francophile isn't that pleased, out of all European colonial empires, the Spanish has always been my least favourite, can't really tell why.
 
the Spanish Empire was one forged out of pure sheer and will... they conquered a whole continent in less than two generations, forged the first global trade empire, kept it running for 400 years and all while fighting Frenchs, British, Dutchs, Arabs, Turks, Portuguese, Venetians, the Pope, Protestants and Rebels inside... had been the State better administrated (when America was discovered, Castile and Aragon where very rich and indiustrious lands, with small workshops all over the country, sadly the American gold and silver made easier just to buy things instead of fabricate them) and not that fanatical about religion...
 
Hmmm, what challenge can that be, I wonder.
More will be revealed

Quite an interesting tale. Though my inner Francophile isn't that pleased, out of all European colonial empires, the Spanish has always been my least favourite, can't really tell why.
My conquest of France in this game was entirely accidental to begin with. But after a certain point continuing became ... logical.

the Spanish Empire was one forged out of pure sheer and will... they conquered a whole continent in less than two generations, forged the first global trade empire, kept it running for 400 years and all while fighting Frenchs, British, Dutchs, Arabs, Turks, Portuguese, Venetians, the Pope, Protestants and Rebels inside... had been the State better administrated (when America was discovered, Castile and Aragon where very rich and indiustrious lands, with small workshops all over the country, sadly the American gold and silver made easier just to buy things instead of fabricate them) and not that fanatical about religion...
Yes, the way the Spanish Empire sort of hollowed out from the inside is very interesting.
 
History 07 - The Two Covenants
Excerpts from A Brief History of the Red Lion
Chapter 7 - The Two Covenants


By the early eighteenth century it was increasingly clear the Spanish Empire had a major problem: it was simply too large for the technologies of the time and the administrative competence of Spain. It would easily take six months for a round-trip across the Atlantic, and sometimes over a year for voyages to the domains even further flung. Add the this the increasing passivity of Spanish governance. Until King Charles II the Spanish monarchs had been actively involved in the affairs of their domains. There were decisions, sometimes good and sometimes not, but still decisions. The King decided what to happen, and the Committees worked out how to carry out the royal desire.

Charles II didn’t really make many decisions, apart from showing a keen interest in Madrid’s beautification. In the absence of his commands authority naturally devolved to the Committees, but as anyone knows a committee is only rarely a good place for a decision to be made. Oh sometimes a figure emerges with the energy and clout to act as a leader, but more often committees become a way of avoiding responsibilities, of catering to smallest attainable act.

Not only that but over the four decades of Charles II’s reign the Committees became increasingly riven with factionalism, both within Committees and between Committees. Add into this the inherent conservatism of Spanish society, which remained highly stratified in Spain itself. Rules regarding non-Catholics were very strict. The Iberian universities produced some very able administrators, but never enough: simply too few students were admitted from too narrow a class of people. In addition there was a simple inflexibility on matters of faith and trade.

All this Carlos de Aranda had observed on his grand tour of the Empire. When he had power this personal knowledge allowed him to argue long and hard - and successfully - that something had to be done. In his own writing that has survived he admits he never really thought he could seriously reform Spanish administration. He didn’t ignore it entirely: he opened a series of scholarships to train more administrators, for example. However the Committee system was no entrenched. If he had come from a great family like his mentor, or if Charles III had been a more actively engaged monarch and not, ultimately, a foreigner then perhaps things would have been different. Rather than wage a war he knew he could not win he tinkered where he could, and focused his efforts elsewhere.

The first of these efforts was shipping. Spain simply didn’t build enough ships. It is not that Spanish ships were poor - they were not. There were just not enough of them, especially for the burgeoning trans-oceanic trading. In theory cities of the Spanish Empire were not meant to trade with non-Spanish ships except in very particular circumstances. In reality they had no option. Smuggling and dodged taxes were rife. The nation that did most of this was England, or rather Great Britain as it was now known, being the only other large colonial power (even more so after France’s eventual defeat).

Carlos de Aranda’s approach was unorthodox and direct: he negotiated with the British. Of course he could not do so openly, so he used the offices of the Red Lion. The Red Lion had maintained contacts, and for several years the discrete negotiations continued. The conclusion of the French War gave an added impetus, and by 1718 the deal was more or less done. It became known as the Covenant of Shipping between the two Empires, and in its first form essentially went like this. An British shipbuilder would build two ships. The two ships would be inspected by a Spanish agent. The Spanish agent would choose one ship that would be gifted to Spain, the other would have the right to trade in Spanish ports. In consequence for ending smuggling the tariffs would likewise be lowered.

It was, in fact, rather more involved than that, with a complicated protocol for already existing ships. When Walpole - the British leader and negotiator - and de Aranda revealed the Covenant to their respective sides both faced uproar. However these two wily men had each allowed the other certain clauses which could be shifted, allowing both to claim negotiating victories over their outsmarted colleagues.

In terms of making up the lack of merchant marine it is hard to overstate how successful this agreement was. The economies of both Empires were duly enhanced, a difference being felt within a decade. It also created a new set of ships known as Treaty Ships. There was the Atlantic Treaty ship that specialised in voyages to America, the India Treaty Ship which went to India, and the Pacific Treaty ship which went further - but also the Great River Treaty ships that went up the Mississippi and Amazon, and the Small River Treaty ships that ventured on more modest waterways.

The Covenant is still extant today, greatly modified of course. It is regarded as the longest continually running commercial treaty in the world. Originally though it was not just a commercial arrangement, as there were then-secret clauses about how both nations would cooperate against potential colonial rebels. It was the first alliance Spain had ever signed with a non-Catholic Christian power.

The Red Lion, for their good offices, received their due share. From Carlos de Aranda they negotiated the use of every other ship awarded to Spain. There were certain conditions - these vessels had part of their cargo capacity reserved for Imperial shipments and the like, or they might be used to carry troops. For a fee, but a much smaller one than if the Spanish were to use regular contractors.

Hand in hand, and indeed agreed at around the same time, was the Covenant of the Red Lion. It too remains extant to this day, though again highly modified. In its original form however the Red Lion were granted the right to form enclaves in a number of Spanish Imperial cities, some in Europe, but most in the overseas possessions. Within the boundary of each Enclave the Red Lion could largely set their own laws, though certain crimes were still enforced - in particular treasonous matters. In return the Red Lion ceased its own smuggling, paying a tariff on its earnings - and, as ever, acting as agents of the Empire. This was the second prong of Carlos de Aranda’s attempts to increase the economic vitality of the Empire - because if the Red Lion had proved one thing since Charles Simmonds had arrived in Madrid it was their capacity for business.

There were two other motives. The first of these was that Carlos de Aranda hoped to slowly reform Spain through these enclaves. He knew enough of the Red Lion to know that the enclaves would be free of slavery, and would allow non-Catholic worship, as just two particular measures. He hoped this would slowly cause a shift in attitudes elsewhere.

His second motive was also to bind the Red Lion to the Spanish Empire in an unbreakable bond. Given everything it is hard to argue he was unsuccessful in doing so, but it is also hard to believe he would be happy at our modern world.