An Imperial Avro Aspirant.
In local and state elections, the once-dominant DKP had been losing ground to its rivals, and the general election was only a year away.
Rumors circulated in dissident circles of something terrible occurring overseas, but most citizens had long ago understood the dangers of asking inconvenient questions.
I wonder what the first jet fighter is going to be and who will have it?
it sucks for the expelled people ,now will Transcaucasian Socialist Republic be allowed to maintain power or be destroyed by a coalition of western powers?
So you have taken the cluster**** that was OTL's Partition and transplanted it to the Middle East, turned up the nastiness by a hefty dose and distributed it between six or so new states all intent on making their countries homogeneous.
And just as you think things can't get any worse, the Saudis are back. Ugh.
But at least German and Canadian grunts actually want to preserve the peace and avoid fighting each-other. That's a promising sign.
Given the historical examples, it really doesn't. Though this line of thinking has been used to justify it.it is interesting to think maybe if forcing everyone into their own areas will actually help.
Given the German Constitution Hassel might be able to hold on, but it would be interesting to see him struggle with handling the popular vote. It doesn't seem to think much of it.i am very interested to see what happens in the german election. could be a big turning point depending who wins.
Anybody up for Bourbon vs Bonaparte rematch?I have a feeling that things are coming to a head soon. The AAR's title will be coming into play soon, and France in it's entirety needs to be freed from the Hun jackboot.
Anybody up for Bourbon vs Bonaparte rematch?
That's assuming he's even born and that the circumstances that allowed his message to be necessary or widespread still exist.Hmm...
I just realized who will free the AUS from Long and his cronies deadly grip. Martin Luther King Jr. shall illuminate the American Union States. Well, once the 60's hist anyways.
Hmm...
I just realized who will free the AUS from Long and his cronies deadly grip. Martin Luther King Jr. shall illuminate the American Union States. Well, once the 60's hist anyways.
Hmm...
I just realized who will free the AUS from Long and his cronies deadly grip. Martin Luther King Jr. shall illuminate the American Union States. Well, once the 60's hist anyways.
Sadly Malcom X wouldn't be a syndie since he was more an islamist than a communist in OTL and I don't think he would change that thought process.Perhaps a Syndie MLK and Malcolm X team up?
He was born in 1929. Given that Long is allowing the segragationists free reign to Jim Crow the whole country, there is still a need.That's assuming he's even born and that the circumstances that allowed his message to be necessary or widespread still exist.
If Malcolm X can't be a Syndie because of his religion then neither can MLK. He was a baptist minister. Maybe he would develop a Christian Socialism.Sadly Malcom X wouldn't be a syndie since he was more an islamist than a communist in OTL and I don't think he would change that thought process.
Who knows with MLK though? Anything could happen.
The PoD is before that. The United States was changed shortly after the PoD in KR thus giving about 10 years for people moving around due to changing jobs and live in worse conditions.He was born in 1929.
Okay, you answered necessity but do the methods and possibilities for his message to become widespread still exist?Given that Long is allowing the segragationists free reign to Jim Crow the whole country, there is still a need.
He was introduced to the Islamic cult while in prison through letters from his siblings so I imagine it would be possible for his siblings to be introduced to Syndicalism instead and, through them, Malcolm himself. Regardless of my agreeing with you that it's possible for Malcolm to be a Syndie or Totalist, I would like to say that your train of thought is rather flawed as, for a majority of his career as a political symbol, he was an Islamic extremist until the last few months of his life, unlike MLK Jr. who was no where near as extreme in his beliefs. The point I feel that guy was trying to make was that being Islamist and Black was Malcolm's politics while MLK Jr. used his role as a minister to promote his own politics separate from his religion, not some sort of Black Christian theocracy but rather desegregation and equal rights for all.If Malcolm X can't be a Syndie because of his religion
I was responding to someone saying that Malcolm X couldn't be a Syndicalist because of his religion while then suggesting that MLK could no problem. I don't see how that train of thought is flawed just because there was a different intensity. It seemed strange to me that imply that one. I have no idea why you think I was implying that MLK wanted a Theocracy. The New Democratic Party in Canada was founded by someone like that so I don't think you would get Theocracy from Christian Socialism.He was introduced to the Islamic cult while in prison through letters from his siblings so I imagine it would be possible for his siblings to be introduced to Syndicalism instead and, through them, Malcolm himself. Regardless of my agreeing with you that it's possible for Malcolm to be a Syndie or Totalist, I would like to say that your train of thought is rather flawed as, for a majority of his career as a political symbol, he was an Islamic extremist until the last few months of his life, unlike MLK Jr. who was no where near as extreme in his beliefs. The point I feel that guy was trying to make was that being Islamist and Black was Malcolm's politics while MLK Jr. used his role as a minister to promote his own politics separate from his religion, not some sort of Black Christian theocracy but rather desegregation and equal rights for all.
I know, and I was explaining why that logic was faulty.I was responding to someone saying that Malcolm X couldn't be a Syndicalist because of his religion while then suggesting that MLK could no problem.
I was contrasting Malcolm's goals to MLK Jr.'s goals, not implying that that's what you thought.I have no idea why you think I was implying that MLK wanted a Theocracy.
Inspired yes, but what I'm saying is that with Malcolm, religion WAS his goal. His goal for a majority of his career up until the last few months of his life when he left that cult was to create an independent Black, Islamic country. MLK Jr.'s goals weren't for promoting Christianity but rather to promote civil rights. A promotion that, like you said, was inspired by his position as a Christian minister as he felt that god created all men equal, regardless of color. He was promoting these beliefs but not his religion, thus leaving him on a different scale than Malcolm.He explicitly said he saw his fight for civil rights as an extension of his ministry, so I feel reasonable to say his politics were somewhat inspiredby his religion.
Wooo! Go Beria