Okay, so last I heard about the upcoming republics DLC, they said they won't have the commune of Rome because it will require a total revamp of the county of Rome. In the current game, the county's capital is a bishopric named Rome while under papal rule, and in order to make the Commune of Rome the church holding needs to change into a city holding.
Why not rename the holdings in Rome so the church will be named "The Vatican" (or Il Vaticano) and one of the cities be named "Rome" (or Roma). That way when the commune of Rome takes over, it puts Rome as the capital. If Westminster and London are separate holdings then why can't Rome and Vatican be as well?
Speaking of Rome and London, why aren't the Coat of Arms correct?
The City of London's coat of arms (without the Dragons) looks like this:
Rome's Coat of Arms:
And many others. I know Paris, Berlin, Stockholm, and other major European population centers have their own flags and CoAs.
I am willing to pay for a barony Coat of Arms pack DLC (I already bought the other two Dynasty shields packs).
Why not rename the holdings in Rome so the church will be named "The Vatican" (or Il Vaticano) and one of the cities be named "Rome" (or Roma). That way when the commune of Rome takes over, it puts Rome as the capital. If Westminster and London are separate holdings then why can't Rome and Vatican be as well?
Speaking of Rome and London, why aren't the Coat of Arms correct?
The City of London's coat of arms (without the Dragons) looks like this:
Rome's Coat of Arms:
And many others. I know Paris, Berlin, Stockholm, and other major European population centers have their own flags and CoAs.
I am willing to pay for a barony Coat of Arms pack DLC (I already bought the other two Dynasty shields packs).