If it's from 1.09 or 1.091, that's a known bug. And if I can just get a few more changes in, I'll be able to release the 1.09-compatible version of the converter.
The CK2 To EU3 Converter Project
- Thread starter Idhrendur
- Start date
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
If it's from 1.09 or 1.091, that's a known bug. And if I can just get a few more changes in, I'll be able to release the 1.09-compatible version of the converter.
If you're specifically concerned about a single country, it's easy enough to add to country_mappings.txt. Genoa is a kingdom-tier title in new patches, but when we originally wrote the mappings, it was duchy-tier. At some point, someone (maybe even me) will go through and add mappings for the new titles.
In the meantime, if you want to solve that specific problem, you can add (in the Kingdoms section) a line like:
link = { CK2 = k_genoa EU3 = GEN } # Genoa
You'll probably find that it's not possible to get all the mappings right, but if it's just a few that really bug you, they're easy to fix.
Thank you, it worked. Just one last question, why were the merchant republic changed to noble republics?
I held the kingdom of Norway,Denmark, Finland and the duchesy of Estonia and held part of Latvia and Lithuania.
And Yes Sweden still lives
I did not have time to consume it before game ended. I also needed 400 piety to create Scandinavian Empire.But game ended before I could do it.
Yeh I am just dum, I see whats wrong now. I was under the impression that I would start in EU3 where CK2 ended(1453) but instead I see I started 1251... and yeh the Golden Horde was a troll in me game at that time
This is 1236
not sure if this is a known bug but I will post it anyway: Changing the sliders of my economy does nothing, literally (also deflation):
I converted save from 1361 to EU3 to see what would happen and I found a bug, I think that isn't caused by date, but by something in script. Screens:
My country is Ulm and I have one province in Ireland. Here is another screen:
As you can see, I am part of Holy Roman Empire, but I don't really know why I have one province in Ireland, and HRE has 2 provinces there. Looking at CK2 I should have both provinces as Ulm, and both should be in HRE, but more importantly it's like converter is attaching HRE provinces from CK2 not equally to it's owner and HRE in EU3 which is really odd.
EDIT: And here is how it looks like in CK2:
Also, I inform you that I have 1.08v without The Republic.
My country is Ulm and I have one province in Ireland. Here is another screen:
As you can see, I am part of Holy Roman Empire, but I don't really know why I have one province in Ireland, and HRE has 2 provinces there. Looking at CK2 I should have both provinces as Ulm, and both should be in HRE, but more importantly it's like converter is attaching HRE provinces from CK2 not equally to it's owner and HRE in EU3 which is really odd.
EDIT: And here is how it looks like in CK2:
Also, I inform you that I have 1.08v without The Republic.
Last edited:
Yeh I am just dum, I see whats wrong now. I was under the impression that I would start in EU3 where CK2 ended(1453) but instead I see I started 1251... and yeh the Golden Horde was a troll in me game at that time
The game dates should match. You'll start EU3 at whatever date the CK2 save game was created. Check the date in your input.eu3; maybe you grabbed a slightly older save?
Yeah, economies are no longer predicted in advance. It's a bug on my short list. Though it should resolve after a month. Does it?
I don't know, I didn't play the first month since I was hoping the bug would get fixed before I actually play the game, lol. Is there an ETA on when 0.6a should be released?
So I did the proses one more time and this time I got this
Whats wrong this time is: Denmark exist again(I lost Syn and Skåne)
Finland exist and have taken Ingermanland and Nevan and clam/consider Bergenhus as a core.
I have received 2 cores from Sweden( Stockholm and Halsingland). DK,FN and SWE is allied whit me.
I start whit no money, manpower, army and -12 Prestige
Also only castles are built.
if you have low crown authority then some of your duchies will be independent from you, is the new Denmark your vassal/in PU with you?
As far as I can tell, it's working as expected. Meath and Munster are obvious, I hope. What's tricky is Leinster.
The way the province mappings are done (I think, I don't have the code in front of me right now), what becomes Leinster in EU3 is two CK2 provinces, one of which you own and one of which England owns. That you own part of it is enough to give you a core, and to make it an HRE member. But province ownership can go either way, depending on the baronies owned. See this post for reference.
Whats wrong this time is: Denmark exist again(I lost Syn and Skåne)
Finland exist and have taken Ingermanland and Nevan and clam/consider Bergenhus as a core.
I have received 2 cores from Sweden( Stockholm and Halsingland). DK,FN and SWE is allied whit me.
I start whit no money, manpower, army and -12 Prestige
That looks a lot more like what I'd expect.
Denmark and Finland should be junior partners in personal unions with you (if you hold both titles and the crown laws do not guarantee identical succession), or else vassals (if a duke disliked you enough, and your crown authority was low enough).
No money is a known bug, manpower and army conversion are not yet implemented, and prestige is also bugged. Forts are the only buildings that convert at the moment.
Okey, I get it. But if that what you are writing is true, there is another problem. I haven't core on Leinster and also haven't "Reconquest" CB which I should have in this case. Because if HRE has Leinster in EU3, this means that somebody from CK2's HRE have something in that area and should have core there also right? And that someone was only me and I don't have core there.
Yes I see now
Yeh I lowered Crown authority in Norway more then DK and FIN because the duks where annoying whit there demands to lower it. And no NR and Fin had nominate king but not in DK. Still trying to get the hang of this game so how do I set guarantee identical succession? Also just want to tank everyone that help t me understand more. I have started a new CK2 game now but will continue experimenting whit the old
Three conditions:
1. Have the same Gender Laws - for example, if one realm is Agnatic, and the other Agnatic-Cognatic, then identical succession is not guaranteed (because if some king has daughters only, the realms will have different succession).
2. Have the same Succession Laws - for example, if one realm is Primogeniture and the other is Seniority, then identical succession is not guaranteed (in fact, it's unlikely).
3. Succession Laws are NOT Elective - even if both realms are elective (satisfying #2), the electors for each realm are determined independently, so, if one group of electors decides not to endorse the monarch's nominee and the other does, the realms will have different succession.
That's potentially a bug, then. And on my list in the second post. Thanks for bringing it up!
I've been working on getting governments more properly converted, and I've got two questions:
1. Should nations sometimes convert as tribal democracies? You see this in the default game, with nations as advanced as the muslim tech group.
2. Is there a decent way of determining which nations convert as merchant republics? The existing rule is any republic which contains a CoT, but it never gets used because we don't yet convert CoTs. 1.09 might give us better choices, but I'm not even sure if trade republics can be distinguished from non-trade ones. Or if that's a valid distinction.
Edit: Here's the existing conversion method. Forgot to include it before. Though there are some bugs in the current implementation.
1. Should nations sometimes convert as tribal democracies? You see this in the default game, with nations as advanced as the muslim tech group.
2. Is there a decent way of determining which nations convert as merchant republics? The existing rule is any republic which contains a CoT, but it never gets used because we don't yet convert CoTs. 1.09 might give us better choices, but I'm not even sure if trade republics can be distinguished from non-trade ones. Or if that's a valid distinction.
Edit: Here's the existing conversion method. Forgot to include it before. Though there are some bugs in the current implementation.
Last edited: