Personally, I am still quite dissatisfied with the rigidity of the Ruler Designer DLC. Even thought I got it at 50% discount, it still felt like something that's roughly put together. At the very least, it should work without glitches (i.e. clothing, head gear, background, etc) if it is something that should cost $10.
The anger...
- Thread starter murlocmancer
- Start date
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
- Status
It's just like the alien attack that was in HoI2 btw it's lack of inclusion in HoI3 saddened me greatly. They are a game company that routinely does fun off the wall stuff with their games. The most amusing part for me is how some of the people raging are claiming that this hurts Paradox's image and is insulting to their player base and wonder were they've been till I see their join date.
Because I care about the opinion of a community centered around things I enjoy, and seeing them acting in a way that is irrational from my point of view can be disturbing, especially since it affects people that do things I like.
Except I justified my views just not by saying things that are objectively false.
Please tell me what is "objectively false" about "I dislike this DLC".
Are opinions not allowed in Pelarys land?
That is not false, you're just missing the entire point of the debate here. People are complaining because the development of this joke DLC alleged diverted the devs from doing major DLCs they wanted (Pagans and whatnot) but paradox (keeping in mind they are not drone at your services) actually stated it was not the case (see FAQ) and that they merely set off people that had done/couldn't do yet their job on other DLCs to do this mini DLC instead of nothing.
EDIT: I see you added a more direct attack against me so I will add one as well. You have not a clue of what is being said/"debated" yet manage to voice a clueless attack against someone who attempted to be nice. You're part of the problem.
Last edited:
Saying "I dislike this DLC" is not bad but is a honest and acceptable opinion. BUT they problem is how people is just being weird about it like saying tat PDS is screwing over there fanbase or that they are going from being a game developers who make historical gapes to be a fantasy game developers. Personally I wont buy it(well I might buy it bit not play it) not because I do not like the scenario but because this scenario is a little to funky for my taste.
People wanted to be the pope or to conquer shit as venice and instead they got angry aztecs.
No, I think you would like to paint anyone who dislikes this DLC into a box. I think to say that you can know with any certainty that everyone who dislikes this DLC believes that paradox was 'wasting resources', is really absurd. I won't deny that people have posted on this forum expressing that opinion, nor will I argue whether or not it has merit as a position, but I will say that perhaps you should be more considerate of others expressing their dislike before you swoop in to call their opinions "objectively false".
You're not reading are you? I don't care about people who dislike the DLC, I can get that. I complain about those particular people who complain to paradox because they think they're wasting resources.
For many of them their opinion regarding what this DLC will mean for the game ARE objectively false, so it's not wrong for him to state such.
I think I'll end this by saying, I saw no specific mention of the group that you now seem to claim was your original target all along in your original posts. In fact, I don't really appreciate the hostile tone in which you've been writing and think you should try to be a more compassionate person. Cheers.
Here it is
First post, thank you for proving that you're not reading.
Perhaps I wasn't talking to you with my first post. I know the thought is hard to handle.
What astonishes me is that anyone is surprised that people are angry. Paradox forumites have always been a notoriously fussy bunch.
Yes but something about CK2 and it's expansions, DLC, patches really seems to bring it out in a way that's unique. Normally, people get all up in arms and debate stuff that is going to be included in the game OR impact their game. The rage on the CK2 forums is "OMG THEY PUT MUSIC IN A DLC ARRRRGGGHH"
What do you mean? Anyway I think you have more or less got my point, and continuing to debate would be pointless. I don't think the term objectively false is inapplicable in the cases I pointed out.
I am very surprised by the way people are acting as well. These type of games normally attract a more mature gamer yet today you would think the forum is filled with the same type of pimple faced 13 year olds who play CoD.
I have never seen outrage like this over an optional DLC. It's sad really.
People are acting like because the devs are doing a fantasy DLC they will never make the other DLC's that are wanted by the community (Pagan/Papacy/Republics).
If you are truly outraged about Paradox making a completely optional DLC that won't affect your game at all then you have a lot of growing up to do.
I have never seen outrage like this over an optional DLC. It's sad really.
People are acting like because the devs are doing a fantasy DLC they will never make the other DLC's that are wanted by the community (Pagan/Papacy/Republics).
If you are truly outraged about Paradox making a completely optional DLC that won't affect your game at all then you have a lot of growing up to do.
What I mean is, I posted in the thread in response to the OP. I saw that I had been quoted, by you, and I responded as such. It's not my job to keep track of the posts you make pal, I wasn't talking specifically to you initially, but from there on out you were talking specifically to me. I responded only to your response to me. Cool it.
- Status