The President arrives at the podium carrying a copy of 'The Independent' newspaper.
"Did you ever have one of those days?"
Loic holds up the copy of the paper for a moment.
"This newpaper referred to the 'boring competence of the current President'. I am not complaining about that. I appreciate the 'competence' accolade, and if you remember, I actually campaigned on trying to make events less interesting, so I am glad they think I am living up to that promise.
However, then they went on to criticize my suggestion of addiction treatment clinics for foreigners, which was made possible by a act amended by the CUE MGA to include protections against the concerns that the paper spoke about. Addicts can be classified into two categories, those who are seeking treatment for their addiction and those who aren't. I feel the description in the paper..."
The Independent understands that he just wishes them to be treated here, but doesn't he understand that such a flow of miscreants, desperate to find money to fuel their habits, will have an extremely negative effect on the crime figures in our country? The President seems happy to relieve the burden on other nations at the expense of our own citizens' protection and safety.
"... fails to make that distinction. The addiction treatment centers would be licensed by MESA, as all such facilities are currently. They would arrange medical visas for those arriving for treatment. The clinics would meet their patients at the airport, take them directly to the treatment center, and, as I understand the procedure, the patients stay on the premises during the course of treatment to prevent the tempation for backsliding, which could lead to the crimes that the paper speaks of. If a clinic develops a pattern of patients that commit crimes, MESA should remove it license. The clinics generally require payment in advance, so there is no risk of indigents being thrust into our welfare system. It will be a boon for our ecomomy, increasing employment, which decreases crime. The paper is of course entitled to express any opinion it wishes, but I wanted to make sure the people had the full story.
There is another more important matter that I wish to bring to people's attention, that may make things less boring, which in this case, I am sure you will agree when you hear the details, is not good. It concerns an event that happened last term, the Hainan Star incident. As Minister of Trade and International Affairs, I received a call from the Deputy Foreign Minister of the Peoples Republic of China who indicated his country's extreme displeasure with..."
the act of war your country committed against the Chinese people! Photographs of the dead bodies of our nationals spread out across a beach are circulating China and the world, and our government is outraged at this infringement upon our sovereignty!
He then presented a list of of demands, one of which had been partially compiled with already, others to which I was willing to agree as a part of an overall arrangement, some to which I suggested minor modifications, and one which required me to consult others. He was not receptive to my approach, and established a 30 day deadline for our agreement to comply with all the demands. After that, they intend to take the matter to the Security Council of the United Nations. Given the lack of respect for our institutions and our sovereignty evidenced by this undiplomatic aparatchik of an unrepresentative government, I would suggest that need not bother waiting the thirty days, and can bring it up at the UN as soon as they please.
First, I reject, as would any unbiased observer, that there was any act of war against the People's Republic of China. We cannot wage war on China if we stay here within our own borders, and any weapons that are fired land here as well. The Hainan Star was in our territorial waters, operating illegally and unsafely, disregarding orders to stop. When we fired a shot across its bows, it finally stopped, but two smaller boats left the ship and headed to shore, along with many individuals swimming or paddling. Our Navy ordered those boats to stop, but they refused. We were obliged to fire shots across their bows. As I understand it, one of the shots unfortunately struck one of the boats, killing some of the passengers. This is not warfare, this was an unfortunate by-product of the criminal activity. If two bank robbers try to rob a bank and one of them is shot and killed by a security guard or police officer, the dead robber's accomplice can be charged with murder, not the person who fired the shot. The captain of the Hainan Star is in custody, and the office of Commisioner of Justice will announce the charges against him when the investigation has been completed.
The refugees that swarmed ashore were apparently entering this country illegally. Whether they should have been fired on or not is currently the main element of the court martial of Admiral Tulp, which is currently under way. If firing on those refugees was an illegal act, it was just that, committed here and thus due to be punished here. There is no appropriate theory about how it was an act of war against China.
As to claim that we have infringed upon their sovereignty, I find that baseless as well, up to the point that they contacted us. Many of their demands clearly infringe on our sovereignty. They want Admiral Tulp tried in the Hague. This is an interesting idea, all the more so as they had previously not signed the treaty establishing that institution nore recognized its authority. The also want all their 'nationals living or dead' returned. I told him we are happy to arrange to return the dead. He did indirectly indicate that they might be flexible with timing of the return of those charged with crimes here or who are material witnesses to those crimes, but I am not sure. But the real sticking point is the passengers. Please watch this video..."
The screen plays excerpts from several of the MESA interviews of several passengers, conducted in Chinese, with English subtitles. The pattern is the same, each is asked their name, where the come from, if they are willing to go back to China, and if they want to stay here in a country that shot some of their relatives and friends. There responses reflect what the elder said on the beach, that they would rather die.
"All of the passengers have claimed asylum. In consideration of what they have suffered, it would be inhumanitarian of us to deny their requests. I call on our General Assembly to pass a special bill to accelerate their citizenship, so they are no longer Chinese nationals, to remove this causus belli from the table.
I will take questions at this time."