Temple provinces?

[perhje]

With the development system, will the provinces that now have a temple like Trøndelag, Roma, etc get +1 BT or will they just be ignored on that matter and get nothing to compensate?

 

[blackchoas]

was there a statement saying there are no longer temples in the game?

I would assume they still start with a temples still

 

[perhje]

was there a statement saying there are no longer temples in the game?

I would assume they still start with a temples still

Temples are still in the game, but they are no longer giving flat BT but tax modifier, and since buildings are limited by development and some of the provinces can't have buildings from the start so those can't have those either.

 

[Nikolaj-11]

I'm more curious about the provinces that start with universities.

 

[blackchoas]

Temples are still in the game, but they are no longer giving flat BT but tax modifier, and since buildings are limited by development and some of the provinces can't have buildings from the start so those can't have those either.

what? too many pronouns guy, don't use the same one twice in a row to refer to different things i have no idea what ur talking about

And if they are a tax modifier rather than a flat tax increase isn't that likely a buff to Roma since it has high base tax?

 

[Kagemin]

If I understand the dev comments correctly even the worst of provinces (low base tax, bad terrain, bad climate) will at least be able to sport one building, so I'm guessing that all provinces starting with buildings will have the development to keep them.

 

[perhje]

what? too many pronouns guy, don't use the same one twice in a row to refer to different things i have no idea what ur talking about

And if they are a tax modifier rather than a flat tax increase isn't that likely a buff to Roma since it has high base tax?

You are right on both points. Sorry about that bad sentence, but still you luckily got my point. But the other province mentioned(Trøndelag) won't get anything since the base number of buildings is +1, mountains gives -1 and development is under 10 and will not give more buildings.

If I understand the dev comments correctly even the worst of provinces (low base tax, bad terrain, bad climate) will at least be able to sport one building, so I'm guessing that all provinces starting with buildings will have the development to keep them.

What am I talking about here? Well, first of all, we have reduced the amount of possible buildings, as a large part were fillers. Secondly, we removed the power-cost for building buildings. And finally, not every province can have the same amount of buildings. Currently, a province can have 1 building as default, with some terrains like desert or mountains reducing it by 1, and some increasing it, like farmlands. And, every 10 development allows another building slot in a province. So Paris may be able to have 6 buildings in 1444, while Figuig can not support a single building.

 

[Kagemin]

I was going by this one:

Building up development in one province to go from 1 building to 7 buildings is currently about 60 upgrades.. Which is rather insanely, and extremely costly.. That creates a province which is about Paris & Constaniople together in value.. At about 10.000 monarch power in total.

Actually, since a 1 building prov is bad terrain and climate, it would cost at least twice..

Which sounds to me like a completely undeveloped province in bad terain and climate would still allow for one building. Obviously the whole thing is still in development, but if I'm not mistaken this is a newer post.

 

[perhje]

I was going by this one:

Which sounds to me like a completely undeveloped province in bad terain and climate would still allow for one building. Obviously the whole thing is still in development, but if I'm not mistaken this is a newer post.

Still Johan has stated an example of an province that doesn't get buildings(Figuig) and that is what I taking it from. Your source doesn't say the contrary, but is only stating it will be a huge cost to go from 1 building to 7 buildings and that a one building province probily is one with bad terrain and climate.

 

[Kagemin]

Again, as I understand the latter post a completely undeveloped province in bad terrain and bad climate will still allow for one buildings.
And well, one is a post from late march (the first dev diary on that topic), the other one from early may. As I said the mechanic is still in development, but I'd go with the newer one.

Ragardless of that, I'd say it's pretty safe to assume that every province starting with a building will be allowed to have at least one building.

 

[Wizzington]

Temple is a building in 1.12.

 

[Darkath]

I would assume they still start with a temples still

That would be common sense.

 

[perhje]

Again, as I understand the latter post a completely undeveloped province in bad terrain and bad climate will still allow for one buildings.
And well, one is a post from late march (the first dev diary on that topic), the other one from early may. As I said the mechanic is still in development, but I'd go with the newer one.

Ragardless of that, I'd say it's pretty safe to assume that every province starting with a building will be allowed to have at least one building.

If I read your qoute isolated I would think the same as you did and I hope you are right and I'am wrong. I know it's newer, but it doesn't completly exclude the earlier statement. Still I will not be to sure so we can just wait and see.

 

[Metz]

Temple is a building in 1.12.

Will it be renamed to Church/Cathedral/Mosque/Temple/Synagogue in accordance to the province religion?