Originally posted by jacob-Lundgren
so they are in the game?!?!?![]()
![]()
![]()
if so i got 2 mains to play.
portugal and ethiopia.![]()
No clue.. as for portugal im fairly sure that it didnt exist from the beginning.
Originally posted by jacob-Lundgren
so they are in the game?!?!?![]()
![]()
![]()
if so i got 2 mains to play.
portugal and ethiopia.![]()
I don't know really. Those later scenarios will be released later AFAIK. Not with the release.Originally posted by jacob-Lundgren
guess we know what i am playing first then![]()
I don't know about the rest of the game, but I can't imagine they will be there in the main campaign, as the non-pagan part was a part of the Duchy of Saxony at the time.although when was brandenburg founded? can you play as them in the game ever?
Originally posted by Vandelay
It served in part (along with other treaty violations by Reynald) as a Casus Belli for the war that led to Saladin´s victory at Hattin and capture of Jerusalem.
Jiddah was also raided by the Portuguese in the 1510´s but they were fought off by the Ottomans.
Cheers,
Vandelay
Originally posted by Damocles
However, I don't believe Mecca will even be on the map..
Originally posted by Cornelius Sulla
Or we can destroy the Kabba and build a Church glorifying the Pope on the site of the Kabba and in Mecca in general! Boy that would sure upset those remaining nations.
vale,
Sulla
Originally posted by Damocles
As someone mentioned, Reynald de Chatillon did threaten to desecrate Mecca, yet never really came close. His threat caused just about the entire Islamic world to vilify him so it was surprising when Saladin actually attempted to show a modicum of restraint and mercy towards him.
................
Originally posted by MacLeod
Capturing Mecca would start an Islamic Crusade.
I think it is too far south and most nearby land would be PTI.
Originally posted by Havard
In the SGO review (quoted in the faq) the map is said to cover parts of Persia and the Arabian Peninsula. The question might be if "parts" here refer to both Persia and the Arabian Peninsula, or only the first. Apart from this we know nothing yet about the map coverage in Arabia...
Originally posted by DuquedeBraganca
1066 ? No Portugal ? I guess it's correct but is there some entity vasalized by Leon called the Portucale County ?
Originally posted by Alexandre
I'd read it as meaning parts of Persia and all of Arabia. However, you are right: I could be reading what I want to read. Do we know if any of the Numibian Christian kingdoms are going to be included? If they are, then Mecca will. . .
Originally posted by Havard
In the SGO review (quoted in the faq) the map is said to cover parts of Persia and the Arabian Peninsula. The question might be if "parts" here refer to both Persia and the Arabian Peninsula, or only the first. Apart from this we know nothing yet about the map coverage in Arabia...
Originally posted by eschaton
I don't think there is much of a chance that mecca will be in the game. Look at a world map, and draw a square with the Urals as the eastern border, and (roughly) the bottom of egypt as the southern border. Under such a map, we would get a sliver of Persia, Iraq and the like, and less than half of Arabia. That is the most likely configuration.
Sure, they *could* include all of Arabia, but if they did, they would either have to inlcude Nubia, most of Ethiopia, almost all of Persia, a good deal of central asia, ect. Or they could include PTI, but I have my suspicions that, within the 'square' there will be no PTI provinces, mostly because they seem to have included the samoyed and other finnic peoples for Russia, suggesting the 'square' has been in formerly arcic areas at the top.
Anyway, this brings up another suspicion I have. That one of the reasons muslims are unplayable is because many of them (especially the Turks) will have lands across the PTI that the game will correct for. Meaning, the game will cheat and nerf their manpower and income, the same as it will with the Mongols. Anyone else suspect this?