At the moment I play a mage and my party consists of Barik (tank), Verse (archer), Eb and me (mages). So its one tank and 3 glass cannons and I play on normal. I am a lawful character who sided with the disfavoured.
Next time I want to be a completely brutal psycho. I want to use Verse and KiS (mad killers) and Siren (femme fatale) in my party. (Barik is too lawful, Eb and Lentry are too sane). This means I need to be tanky.
What do you prefer:
- heavy armor, 1h+shield (classic tank but low on damage)
- unarmed + heavy armor (attacks faster, uses only dodge)
- 2h + heavy armor (more damage, I hope I can take some hits)
- throwns weapons, 2h or 1h+shield ? (Do you atomatically switch from range to melee attack when enemies come in range? It would be nice if my tank does not need to walk to the enemy. He thows things at them and when they get close he continues without need for weapon change.
Do you think it is wise to play without a classical mage?
I want to play on hard, not PotD.
Next time I want to be a completely brutal psycho. I want to use Verse and KiS (mad killers) and Siren (femme fatale) in my party. (Barik is too lawful, Eb and Lentry are too sane). This means I need to be tanky.
What do you prefer:
- heavy armor, 1h+shield (classic tank but low on damage)
- unarmed + heavy armor (attacks faster, uses only dodge)
- 2h + heavy armor (more damage, I hope I can take some hits)
- throwns weapons, 2h or 1h+shield ? (Do you atomatically switch from range to melee attack when enemies come in range? It would be nice if my tank does not need to walk to the enemy. He thows things at them and when they get close he continues without need for weapon change.
Do you think it is wise to play without a classical mage?
I want to play on hard, not PotD.