Suggestion war technology improvements

Suggestion war technology improvements

  • Crusader Kings III Available Now!

    The realm rejoices as Paradox Interactive announces the launch of Crusader Kings III, the latest entry in the publisher’s grand strategy role-playing game franchise. Advisors may now jockey for positions of influence and adversaries should save their schemes for another day, because on this day Crusader Kings III can be purchased on Steam, the Paradox Store, and other major online retailers.


    Real Strategy Requires Cunning

Archael90

Lt. General
15 Badges
Nov 30, 2017
1.449
743
  • Stellaris
  • Stellaris: Galaxy Edition
  • Stellaris: Digital Anniversary Edition
  • Stellaris: Leviathans Story Pack
  • Stellaris - Path to Destruction bundle
  • Stellaris: Humanoids Species Pack
  • Stellaris: Apocalypse
  • Stellaris: Distant Stars
  • Stellaris: Megacorp
  • Stellaris: Ancient Relics
  • Stellaris: Lithoids
  • Stellaris: Federations
  • Majesty 2
  • Stellaris: Galaxy Edition
  • Stellaris: Synthetic Dawn
First i would like to ask, what weapons are You using in late game?
If someone said "mixed", or "depend on situation" i truly envy You this. Im doing this only for RPing, but if i have to, or not RP, im using energy weapons, with disruptors, cloud lightning, and arc emmiters especially.
Why? Because few things (Everyone who answered in previous question simmilary should already knows why):
1. Full penetration, which means enemies cannot be prepared for this, and their efforts to upgrade shields/armors are futile.
2. Repetables gives bonus to dmg output for those weapons, but there are no repetables for hull, which means only dmg is worth developing.
3. Repetables redistribution.... Even if i would love to concentrate on anything else, or want mixed weapons on my ships, there are only 4 repetables in physics, and 10 in engineering, which means that propability of developing energy weapon dmg is 100% each time, but developing kinetic dmg is at best 50%, which means energy weapon will be at least 2x better than kinetics/missiles/strikecrafts.
Someone may say that penetrating weapons are very weak, and without repetables they are almost uneffective.
And okay, i may give You that, but still in the endgame there is no better weapons, especially against high armor opponents like crisis, or Awakened empires.
And still, investing in energy weapon is still better. Most energy weapons are extremally weak against shields, so You have to use kinetics or missiles to destroy those shields before energy can destroy ship? Erm... No... (But even so, this would means that kinetics and missiles are just addons to energy), You can use Energy siphon, and Null Void Beam to destroy shields, and those are still energy weapons. More on that, there are some other things that can help - Pulsars are nullifing shields completly, meaning Youe energy weapons are even more powerfull, and starbase/titans have aura that reduce enemy shields by 20% which means You have to deliver only 80% dmg to destroy that shields, starting from 50%, only few repetables makes those weapons 100% effective against shielded opponents without using any addons.

Can we do something with that?
Of course we can!
I mean... Paradox can, and i hope they want to improve game experience for all players...
1. First thing is that fully penetrating weapons should not be a thing at all.
2.Second is weapons types should have their niche that can be achive only with that weampos but not other... so energy weapons generally good against shields, and kinetics good against armor (not other way), missiles with high dmg to everything, but should be able to be easly destroyed by PD. And strikecrafts should be generally good, but easly defeated by other strikecrafts, and PD.
3. Redistribute repetable techs, so in both physics, and engineering would be same amount of techs. You can explain it however You want, like matted compretion for armor bonus is physics, because it is not a new material, but other technology apllied to process of producing those materials. Strikecrafts, and defence platforms bonusses can be unified to two techs (one for strikecraft dmg, and speed, and one for defence platform dmg, and hull), also missiles dmg can be also transfer to physics, and thus we have 6 physics, and 6 engineering repetables.

You can leave this here and game will be much more fun to play, but i have few more suggestions, and i know that there are mods for this but mods are not vanilla game ;)
4. Starting weapons. We should be able to diversify our empires from others and choose our starting weapons, we would be able to research other weapons from research agreements with other empires (for pacifists and xenophiles) and from debries. I personally think that this would be much more fun, if we would have more diversity in game. In galaxy generation settings we should be able to choose one from 3 options:
a) Unlocked start - every empire start with weapons of their choice but can freely research other weapons types.
b) Locked start - Every empire start with weapons of their choice and can research other weapons by debries or research agreements with empires who started with different weapons.
c) Full Lock - Empires start with weapons of their choice but cannot research other weapons (in exception of genocidals empires) this way only powerfull federations would be able to equipped their ships with all weapons.
5. Weapons harvest from critters should be tagged as "Special" weapons that power would be upgraded by society repetables.
6. H, P, G weapon slots should be removed, all weapons should be able to be placed in all spots (S, M, L, without X and T, which would be special), that would allow to make fully specialized ships and fleets.
7. More weapons types. This mod Makes a very great work with this, making 4 main weapons types, and 2 different weapons within each type, and special weapons that are harvest from critters

Thanks for listening :D
 
  • 1
  • 1Like
Reactions:

MordridBlack

Major
15 Badges
Jan 1, 2020
613
223
  • Stellaris
  • Stellaris: Galaxy Edition
  • Stellaris: Galaxy Edition
  • Stellaris: Digital Anniversary Edition
  • Stellaris: Leviathans Story Pack
  • Stellaris - Path to Destruction bundle
  • Stellaris: Humanoids Species Pack
  • Stellaris: Apocalypse
  • Stellaris: Distant Stars
  • Stellaris: Megacorp
  • Stellaris: Ancient Relics
  • Stellaris: Lithoids
  • Stellaris: Federations
  • Stellaris: Galaxy Edition
  • Stellaris: Synthetic Dawn
#4 Was how things used to be before I want to say the 2.0 update

however there were...issues with the automatic ship design system

it almost always default to whatever weapon type you chose as a starter (i.e. kinetic, explosive, energy) even if a better option was available
 

Archael90

Lt. General
15 Badges
Nov 30, 2017
1.449
743
  • Stellaris
  • Stellaris: Galaxy Edition
  • Stellaris: Digital Anniversary Edition
  • Stellaris: Leviathans Story Pack
  • Stellaris - Path to Destruction bundle
  • Stellaris: Humanoids Species Pack
  • Stellaris: Apocalypse
  • Stellaris: Distant Stars
  • Stellaris: Megacorp
  • Stellaris: Ancient Relics
  • Stellaris: Lithoids
  • Stellaris: Federations
  • Majesty 2
  • Stellaris: Galaxy Edition
  • Stellaris: Synthetic Dawn
#4 Was how things used to be before I want to say the 2.0 update

however there were...issues with the automatic ship design system

it almost always default to whatever weapon type you chose as a starter (i.e. kinetic, explosive, energy) even if a better option was available
And what is wrong with that? You can change this at any time, and this gives AI some uniqness
 

Make Victoria 3

Major
29 Badges
Feb 19, 2018
785
139
  • Europa Universalis IV: Cossacks
  • Europa Universalis IV: Dharma
  • Stellaris: Distant Stars
  • Europa Universalis IV: Rule Britannia
  • Stellaris: Apocalypse
  • Europa Universalis IV: Cradle of Civilization
  • Europa Universalis IV: Mandate of Heaven
  • Stellaris: Leviathans Story Pack
  • Stellaris: Digital Anniversary Edition
  • Europa Universalis IV: Rights of Man
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Cadet
  • Stellaris
  • Europa Universalis IV: Mare Nostrum
  • Europa Universalis IV: Common Sense
  • Europa Universalis IV: El Dorado
  • Victoria 2
  • Europa Universalis IV
  • Crusader Kings II: The Old Gods
  • Crusader Kings II
  • Victoria 2: Heart of Darkness
  • Victoria 2: A House Divided
  • Europa Universalis IV: Res Publica
  • Europa Universalis IV: Wealth of Nations
  • Stellaris - Path to Destruction bundle
  • Europa Universalis IV: Conquest of Paradise
  • Europa Universalis IV: Third Rome
  • Europa Universalis IV: Art of War
  • Crusader Kings II: Sword of Islam
  • Crusader Kings II: Legacy of Rome
Also the titan weapons should have variants.
 
  • 2
Reactions:

MordridBlack

Major
15 Badges
Jan 1, 2020
613
223
  • Stellaris
  • Stellaris: Galaxy Edition
  • Stellaris: Galaxy Edition
  • Stellaris: Digital Anniversary Edition
  • Stellaris: Leviathans Story Pack
  • Stellaris - Path to Destruction bundle
  • Stellaris: Humanoids Species Pack
  • Stellaris: Apocalypse
  • Stellaris: Distant Stars
  • Stellaris: Megacorp
  • Stellaris: Ancient Relics
  • Stellaris: Lithoids
  • Stellaris: Federations
  • Stellaris: Galaxy Edition
  • Stellaris: Synthetic Dawn
And what is wrong with that? You can change this at any time, and this gives AI some uniqness
because unless you actively chose to alter your ships weapons they would ALWAYS be on their starting weapon type

and the ai is incredibly dumb (always has been)
 

Archael90

Lt. General
15 Badges
Nov 30, 2017
1.449
743
  • Stellaris
  • Stellaris: Galaxy Edition
  • Stellaris: Digital Anniversary Edition
  • Stellaris: Leviathans Story Pack
  • Stellaris - Path to Destruction bundle
  • Stellaris: Humanoids Species Pack
  • Stellaris: Apocalypse
  • Stellaris: Distant Stars
  • Stellaris: Megacorp
  • Stellaris: Ancient Relics
  • Stellaris: Lithoids
  • Stellaris: Federations
  • Majesty 2
  • Stellaris: Galaxy Edition
  • Stellaris: Synthetic Dawn
because unless you actively chose to alter your ships weapons they would ALWAYS be on their starting weapon type

and the ai is incredibly dumb (always has been)
Okay, your argument is that auto ship design with specialized weapon start is under-optimal, and AI do not change it?
 

MordridBlack

Major
15 Badges
Jan 1, 2020
613
223
  • Stellaris
  • Stellaris: Galaxy Edition
  • Stellaris: Galaxy Edition
  • Stellaris: Digital Anniversary Edition
  • Stellaris: Leviathans Story Pack
  • Stellaris - Path to Destruction bundle
  • Stellaris: Humanoids Species Pack
  • Stellaris: Apocalypse
  • Stellaris: Distant Stars
  • Stellaris: Megacorp
  • Stellaris: Ancient Relics
  • Stellaris: Lithoids
  • Stellaris: Federations
  • Stellaris: Galaxy Edition
  • Stellaris: Synthetic Dawn
Okay, your argument is that auto ship design with specialized weapon start is under-optimal, and AI do not change it?
Auto Ship design is under-optimal by default, but back then it was more so because the game took whatever weapon type you had/choose for your empire and stuck with it regardless of other (possibly better) options being available [it did upgrade to better versions of your tech...but that was about it]


Now auto ship design is still under-optimal but it at least tends to vary damage [often having a rough even mix of kinetic and energy...but rarely pulling on explosive as far as I have seen]


I can't say much on if the AI changed their ship designs in either case. I didn't even know that was a thing until rather recently so I never checked
 

Archael90

Lt. General
15 Badges
Nov 30, 2017
1.449
743
  • Stellaris
  • Stellaris: Galaxy Edition
  • Stellaris: Digital Anniversary Edition
  • Stellaris: Leviathans Story Pack
  • Stellaris - Path to Destruction bundle
  • Stellaris: Humanoids Species Pack
  • Stellaris: Apocalypse
  • Stellaris: Distant Stars
  • Stellaris: Megacorp
  • Stellaris: Ancient Relics
  • Stellaris: Lithoids
  • Stellaris: Federations
  • Majesty 2
  • Stellaris: Galaxy Edition
  • Stellaris: Synthetic Dawn
Auto Ship design is under-optimal by default, but back then it was more so because the game took whatever weapon type you had/choose for your empire and stuck with it regardless of other (possibly better) options being available [it did upgrade to better versions of your tech...but that was about it]


Now auto ship design is still under-optimal but it at least tends to vary damage [often having a rough even mix of kinetic and energy...but rarely pulling on explosive as far as I have seen]


I can't say much on if the AI changed their ship designs in either case. I didn't even know that was a thing until rather recently so I never checked
So either way suto-design is suboptimal, and You have to manually changed designs, so what is the difference?
I can bet devs can do it the way it is now, regardless of weapons You will choose at empire creation.
Either way its not me nor You who should predict what ships designes AI will choose, its for devs.... so... what is wrong? Is it only being worried about something that would not happen, or You just dont like any ways to lock You on something even if you have option to not be locked?
 

MordridBlack

Major
15 Badges
Jan 1, 2020
613
223
  • Stellaris
  • Stellaris: Galaxy Edition
  • Stellaris: Galaxy Edition
  • Stellaris: Digital Anniversary Edition
  • Stellaris: Leviathans Story Pack
  • Stellaris - Path to Destruction bundle
  • Stellaris: Humanoids Species Pack
  • Stellaris: Apocalypse
  • Stellaris: Distant Stars
  • Stellaris: Megacorp
  • Stellaris: Ancient Relics
  • Stellaris: Lithoids
  • Stellaris: Federations
  • Stellaris: Galaxy Edition
  • Stellaris: Synthetic Dawn
not everyone knows about manual ship designs, or if they know they often choose to ignore it as that is just something else to micro-manage
 

Archael90

Lt. General
15 Badges
Nov 30, 2017
1.449
743
  • Stellaris
  • Stellaris: Galaxy Edition
  • Stellaris: Digital Anniversary Edition
  • Stellaris: Leviathans Story Pack
  • Stellaris - Path to Destruction bundle
  • Stellaris: Humanoids Species Pack
  • Stellaris: Apocalypse
  • Stellaris: Distant Stars
  • Stellaris: Megacorp
  • Stellaris: Ancient Relics
  • Stellaris: Lithoids
  • Stellaris: Federations
  • Majesty 2
  • Stellaris: Galaxy Edition
  • Stellaris: Synthetic Dawn

Make Victoria 3

Major
29 Badges
Feb 19, 2018
785
139
  • Europa Universalis IV: Cossacks
  • Europa Universalis IV: Dharma
  • Stellaris: Distant Stars
  • Europa Universalis IV: Rule Britannia
  • Stellaris: Apocalypse
  • Europa Universalis IV: Cradle of Civilization
  • Europa Universalis IV: Mandate of Heaven
  • Stellaris: Leviathans Story Pack
  • Stellaris: Digital Anniversary Edition
  • Europa Universalis IV: Rights of Man
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Cadet
  • Stellaris
  • Europa Universalis IV: Mare Nostrum
  • Europa Universalis IV: Common Sense
  • Europa Universalis IV: El Dorado
  • Victoria 2
  • Europa Universalis IV
  • Crusader Kings II: The Old Gods
  • Crusader Kings II
  • Victoria 2: Heart of Darkness
  • Victoria 2: A House Divided
  • Europa Universalis IV: Res Publica
  • Europa Universalis IV: Wealth of Nations
  • Stellaris - Path to Destruction bundle
  • Europa Universalis IV: Conquest of Paradise
  • Europa Universalis IV: Third Rome
  • Europa Universalis IV: Art of War
  • Crusader Kings II: Sword of Islam
  • Crusader Kings II: Legacy of Rome
also the auto design mixes 100% armor and shield penetration weapons into the mix of whatever it creates which is always a bad thing to do if you dont go with all weapons 100% penetration for armor and shield because any equal tech weapon would be a better choice.
 

Archael90

Lt. General
15 Badges
Nov 30, 2017
1.449
743
  • Stellaris
  • Stellaris: Galaxy Edition
  • Stellaris: Digital Anniversary Edition
  • Stellaris: Leviathans Story Pack
  • Stellaris - Path to Destruction bundle
  • Stellaris: Humanoids Species Pack
  • Stellaris: Apocalypse
  • Stellaris: Distant Stars
  • Stellaris: Megacorp
  • Stellaris: Ancient Relics
  • Stellaris: Lithoids
  • Stellaris: Federations
  • Majesty 2
  • Stellaris: Galaxy Edition
  • Stellaris: Synthetic Dawn
also the auto design mixes 100% armor and shield penetration weapons into the mix of whatever it creates which is always a bad thing to do if you dont go with all weapons 100% penetration for armor and shield because any equal tech weapon would be a better choice.
Another argument for points 1-3 ;)
 

Archael90

Lt. General
15 Badges
Nov 30, 2017
1.449
743
  • Stellaris
  • Stellaris: Galaxy Edition
  • Stellaris: Digital Anniversary Edition
  • Stellaris: Leviathans Story Pack
  • Stellaris - Path to Destruction bundle
  • Stellaris: Humanoids Species Pack
  • Stellaris: Apocalypse
  • Stellaris: Distant Stars
  • Stellaris: Megacorp
  • Stellaris: Ancient Relics
  • Stellaris: Lithoids
  • Stellaris: Federations
  • Majesty 2
  • Stellaris: Galaxy Edition
  • Stellaris: Synthetic Dawn
3. Redistribute repetable techs, so in both physics, and engineering would be same amount of techs. You can explain it however You want, like matted compretion for armor bonus is physics, because it is not a new material, but other technology apllied to process of producing those materials. Strikecrafts, and defence platforms bonusses can be unified to two techs (one for strikecraft dmg, and speed, and one for defence platform dmg, and hull), also missiles dmg can be also transfer to physics, and thus we have 6 physics, and 6 engineering repetables.
Of course we can alo redistribute those techs in different ways
like physics provides all weapons damage, starbase platforms dmg, energy from jobs and shields, but engineering have all weapons fire rates, platform hull, minerals form jobs and armor.
Or anything else, but the point is to equal physics with engineering (and society if we would get some other weapon types that depends on society research).