Firstly, a question: Shall we treat DB additions (missing mothers or relevant children, rulers of something or just a change of a date) as suggestions or bug reports?
Secondly, the Holdings of Rimini was ruled by the Malatesta family in Italy. In game they don't, but the barony exist from 1137 by default. All you have to do is to add them as holders according to the list below.
b_rimini, add as new file (barony exist from 1137.1.1)
The scripters have done their research properly and the death dates and characters are mostly correct so it's only the matter of applying the history dates here and we'd have ourselves some new unique barony holders in Ancona that could be quite interesting.
I argue that they should be following a seniority succession because if you look on the historical succession it went from father to oldest son, to oldest brother, to oldest nephew, to oldest cousin, to oldest cousin's nephew. From oldest to the oldest after that. It keeps it historically accurate and don't interfeer with balance what so ever.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/House_of_Malatesta
Secondly, the Holdings of Rimini was ruled by the Malatesta family in Italy. In game they don't, but the barony exist from 1137 by default. All you have to do is to add them as holders according to the list below.
b_rimini, add as new file (barony exist from 1137.1.1)
Code:
[COLOR="#FFFF00"]1137.1.1={
liege=c_ancona
}
1239.1.1={
law = succ_seniority
holder=73595 #Malatesta I Malatesta
}
1312.1.1={
holder=73586 #Malatesta II Malatesta
}
1317.1.1={
holder=73597 #Pandolfo I Malatesta
}
1326.4.10={
holder=73591 #Ferdinando (Ferrantino) I Malatesta
}
1335.1.1={
holder=73600 #Malatesta III Malatesta
}[/COLOR]The scripters have done their research properly and the death dates and characters are mostly correct so it's only the matter of applying the history dates here and we'd have ourselves some new unique barony holders in Ancona that could be quite interesting.
I argue that they should be following a seniority succession because if you look on the historical succession it went from father to oldest son, to oldest brother, to oldest nephew, to oldest cousin, to oldest cousin's nephew. From oldest to the oldest after that. It keeps it historically accurate and don't interfeer with balance what so ever.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/House_of_Malatesta
Upvote
0
