Start post is updated with a few new additions, images and results from this thread.
Most likely yes, but we are talking about two Slavic groups here: Ruthenians and Slavs (in 11th century, people who would eventually become Slovaks were still calling themselves just Slavs)...or maybe some other group of Slavs, southwestern Slovakia is the part I know a lot about (since my master thesis was about Magyar settlement in that area), east was never really that interesting for me. Maybe Hungarians, even though minority in general, had bigger population there than Slavs and Ruthenians separately.I agree with what you said but abauj/zemplen are still majorly slavic right?
Isnt the term ruthenians wrong by now? I think i read that somewhere and that today historians refer to them as rusyns and ukrainian russians(?) (I might be wrong).Most likely yes, but we are talking about two Slavic groups here: Ruthenians and Slavs (in 11th century, people who would eventually become Slovaks were still calling themselves just Slavs)...or maybe some other group of Slavs, southwestern Slovakia is the part I know a lot about (since my master thesis was about Magyar settlement in that area), east was never really that interesting for me. Maybe Hungarians, even though minority in general, had bigger population there than Slavs and Ruthenians separately.
That map is wrong on so many levels. As Dorlas Anther said.This is the reason why people told you to read from multiple sources.so I found this map of 11th century which confirms my assumption that abauj and zemplen had more slavic inhabitants than hungarians. It would be a mixture of mostly mountains, sparse slavic, slavic and mixed slav-hungarian. Therefore it should be russian...
Hont to be slovak in 876 is also definitely confirmed.
@EldarPanic do you have an idea why there are no romanians displayed but slavs in transylvania?
alright ill forget that map thxThat map is wrong on so many levels. As Dorlas Anther said.This is the reason why people told you to read from multiple sources.
I have no idea what term in English is correct for them. We call them Rusíni in Slovakia and I saw word Ruthenians as a translation of our term.Isnt the term ruthenians wrong by now? I think i read that somewhere and that today historians refer to them as rusyns and ukrainian russians(?) (I might be wrong).
However i dont get your point on that since I see ruthenians, rusyns, ukrainians or whatever as a part of the russian culture in hip...
Im pretty sure it would be rusyn and all ukrainians were called ruthenians for some time.I have no idea what term in English is correct for them. We call them Rusíni in Slovakia and I saw word Ruthenians as a translation of our term.
During CK2 timeframe, "Rusin" was the ethnonym for all eastern slavs - see, for example the Rus-Byzantine treaty of 911, where "Rusin" and "Grechin" are used for "Russian" and "Greek". Another used term was "Rusak" (compare with "Slovak", "Polyak" etc.) The separation between (Great-)Russians, Ukrainians and Belarusians happened much later, when the latter were under PLC rule.Im pretty sure it would be rusyn and all ukrainians were called ruthenians for some time.
So i tried to make the submod but it is not working.
@Toa Kraka can you pls take a look and tell me what I forgot?
Also guys pls dont use it if you get it working because it is not even near to completition.
I just tried to change culture, religion and correct the baronie locations in croatia.
However dropping all the files into HIP mod folder works..
dependencies = { "HIP - Historical Immersion Project" }
tried that earlier, didnt work. Does it work for you?You need this line in the .mod file:
Code:dependencies = { "HIP - Historical Immersion Project" }
Yours only says "HIP".
It's a typo. The folder is named "hip-better-balkans-carpahians", but the path listed in the .mod file is "hip-better-balkans-carpathians".So i tried to make the submod but it is not working.
@Toa Kraka can you pls take a look and tell me what I forgot?
ty so much! no idea how i could not see that...It's a typo. The folder is named "hip-better-balkans-carpahians", but the path listed in the .mod file is "hip-better-balkans-carpathians".
The files look correct to me, so I don't know what the problem is.my attempt to switch wrongly located baronies between provinces in croatia (explained in the start post) still failed.
How can i make my changes take place ingame?
I just edited history/provinces and moved the baronies between the files and adjusted the max baronies for the province.
Same I did in
common/landed_titles/swmh_landed_titles
and
common/province_setup/00_province_setup
Should i even proceed trying this or leave it to the SWMH team?
Most of them seem easy enough for a novice modder; the wiki generally has instructions for what you want to do. However, adding an entire new culture group probably would be significantly more complex than it seems at first glance, since there are other items scattered through HIP that reference culture groups. (Likewise, your editing the maximum holding counts for provinces already has broken the kludge for the land-reclamation event, common/scripted_triggers/emf_can_add_holding_slot_trigger.txt/emf_can_add_holding_slot.)Same question for my other suggestions inside the SWMH/EMF start post spoiler.
I will correct that.Likewise, your editing the maximum holding counts for provinces already has broken the kludge for the land-reclamation event, common/scripted_triggers/emf_can_add_holding_slot_trigger.txt/emf_can_add_holding_slot
It shouldn't be possible, if you're starting a new campaign before testing your mod.I figured out that my editing works in game history but if I actually play the game and build baronies myself their names will still be in the wrong old places.
Any idea how this is possible?
ok i tested it quickly and only b_ozalj does not switch from c_okic to c_modrus. Later or tomorrow I will figure out why...It shouldn't be possible, if you're starting a new campaign before testing your mod.