Btw looking at naval combat... could steel division pacific front be possible? It would be fun to play island hopping... tis would be a unique experience to most RTS games
Btw looking at naval combat... could steel division pacific front be possible? It would be fun to play island hopping... tis would be a unique experience to most RTS games
You dont need naval combat for the pacific.Btw looking at naval combat... could steel division pacific front be possible? It would be fun to play island hopping... tis would be a unique experience to most RTS games
Why not Continuation War?Id also love a winter war scenario... simo hayha recon unit with the capability of sniping entire squads of infantry and tanks? Count me in!
Personally id say france 40 poland 39 china japanese front winter war barbarossa 41 and bagration 44 need some attention...
However i will say Bagration can be balanced... the germans fielded the tanks the soviets had true.. but same can be said for normandy and the overwhelming corps/dividional level numerical superiority can be overlooked... in fact there would be greater proportion so long as numbers arent concerned as the soviets have the tools to pop king tigers... but ehh...
Eastern front wise id pay 50 bucks for a barbarossa 41 or bagration 44... kursk and stalingrad are the true normandies of the eastern front and are waaay overdone
However tbh... ww2 was lost by the battle of stalingrad... a victory at kursk would only have delayed the inevitable
Some are against bringing the Eastern Front to Steel Division, usually using the argument that it was "overdone". However as @gbem said Barbarossa and Bagration (the latter interests me most) are rarely seen in video games. Furthermore I trust Eugen for making a non-biased, historical version of a game taking place in the Eastern Front, which is rare in Western companies (Sega, Activision)
but that would be half the fun... naval combat allows new strategy such as pacific island hopping..... RD only failed in this thanks to poor design but the concept could still workYou dont need naval combat for the pacific.
I'd love that ... but I'm afraid it would be too infantry-centric for most of the audience.Why not Continuation War?
W2 brings enough vehicles' diversity so we don't have to rely on such "prototypes".maybe they can add sekrit division with T-44![]()
I thought there were reports of the Spetsnaz using it?I'd love that ... but I'm afraid it would be too infantry-centric for most of the audience.
W2 brings enough vehicles' diversity so we don't have to rely on such "prototypes".
SD44's biggest unicorn, the Locust, was combat ready and in the division's arsenal for Normandy, and engaged in combat later in the war (Operation Varsity). None of this was the case for the T-44.
Besides, USSR would offer a pretty wide array of units, even if we just consider Bagration. The KVs alone comes in quite a number of configurations!
Did the Spetsnaz officially exist in 1944? I though they were a post-war creation, although from the experience using "special scouts" formations during WW2.I thought there were reports of the Spetsnaz using it?
No, they didn't officially exist in WWII. It was a blanket term similarly used to the way it is used now to cover special forces troops. There have been some unofficial stories explaining that there were T-44's used along side them as a pseudo combat trial.Did the Spetsnaz officially exist in 1944? I though they were a post-war creation, although from the experience using "special scouts" formations during WW2.
It did, but it was called OSNAZ (ОСНАЗ, части ОСобого НАЗначения). They were used from Spanish civil war through all ww2 including winter war.Did the Spetsnaz officially exist in 1944? I though they were a post-war creation, although from the experience using "special scouts" formations during WW2.
I'd love that ... but I'm afraid it would be too infantry-centric for most of the audience.
W2 brings enough vehicles' diversity so we don't have to rely on such "prototypes".
SD44's biggest unicorn, the Locust, was combat ready and in the division's arsenal for Normandy, and engaged in combat later in the war (Operation Varsity). None of this was the case for the T-44.
Besides, USSR would offer a pretty wide array of units, even if we just consider Bagration. The KVs alone comes in quite a number of configurations!
IL2 vs JU87G, which would be more cancerous?
Read something about it in a French magazine "Guerre et Histoire". Apparently the German Stukas were outdated by the
il-2 which appeared in 1941 already. Germans never switched to another attacker and Il-2 was most produced aircraft of ww2 (36 163 units. 6500 Stukas by comparison). Would this make Ilyushin 2 "Sturmovik" cancer to Germans?![]()
Il2 easilyIL2 vs JU87G, which would be more cancerous?