South America Thread

[Brunwulf]

South America IS a poor continent in EuIV. Here some if my suggestion for improving SA.

1.Give thé merchant priviledge Terrass Culture : Which give lower dev cost for all.

2. Give Cuzco more dev after events. This IS for improving the Inca Capital which was bigger than Florence ( who IS dev 28). Alors move the Machu Picchu to Cuzco; it IS strange that hé IS in Abancay.

3. More Tribes in East and South. This will give some fun since cultures has not any tag and some régions are completely empty ( like Chaco)
4.Give Chanchan 25 dev in beginning with an évent which Can reduce or maintain thé dev or give thé missing dev to Cuzco.
5. Some Achievments for the Muisca and Chimu
6.Some mission très for Chimu and Inca.
7.Any founder of the Inca Empire and owning the monument in Quito should get at least an évent improving this évent also reestablish level 3 of Machu Picchu.

 

[Korsjan Rīkis]

I hope that they can some wasteland to Andes.

 

[I Couldn't Decide]

The real problem is that Inca isn't called Tawantinsuyu.

Other than cosmetics, SA is far less developed than NA. Not only in literal development, but also nations. (Also provinces, but that's a no-go). There need to be more mission trees for both. The good news is that SA will likely be updated in the near(ish) future; I don't really have any suggestions, but I can see colonization missions, and some trade power missions (I.E., have 50% or more trade power in Mexico/California/Caribbean, that kind of thing). With the recent missions, I can also see something along the lines of colonizing the Pacific Islands and Australia, an extra golden era, and claims on all provinces in the Americas.

 

[Brunwulf]

South America dev IS very important. There was 20 M people easily in thé former Inca Empire and we have less dev than England who has less population

 

[moscal]

South America dev IS very important. There was 20 M people easily in thé former Inca Empire and we have less dev than England who has less population

Population isn't this same like a dev. GDP PC also isn't this same like a dev.

Dev is total function of population, education, urbanization, logistic, administration, local technical level, infrastructure etc.

But yes. Precolumbian civilizated nations should have more dev.

 

[3445666]

South America dev IS very important. There was 20 M people easily in thé former Inca Empire and we have less dev than England who has less population

I think a high dev in the opening is perfectly feasible. However, given the plagues and other destruction brought by the colonists, when the Europeans (or wherever they were) colonized these places, events could have reduced the development of all provinces. It seems that the event should also raise the price of slaves to simulate the situation of triangular trade to supplement the labor force.