I wish to lend my support to the HEAD OF STATE ACT and the REICHSTAG REPRESENTATIVE RATIONALIZATION ACT - however, I would like to comment on them for a moment:
For the first act, I support it only on the condition that the title "Head of State" be merely symbolic, carrying no other meaning than "leader of the nation" - given that the Chancellor is, already, the "leader of the nation" in almost every imaginable, this seems relatively straightforward if also slightly redundant. However, any act that would seek to give more power to the presidency I strongly object to.
As for the second act, I believe it to be, by and large, a step forward in regards to organization (a key factor to all successful governance). It is only logical that all the provinces within our borders be represented equally, and I consider it a reasonable and just bill.
- Lukas von Freiburg
I hesitate to speak for my uncle, but I am certain he intends for the title to be merely symbolic. Formally naming the chancellor head if state "fills the hole" that certain people may want to replace with a constitutional monarch. Therefore, my uncle and I urge you to support the bill for the protection and strengthening of our Republic.
-Georgio Brunelli