I support the intent of the Government Indoctrination Bill - but I have some concerns about its wording. I believe in its present form, it goes both too far and not far enough.
Not far enough, because its first half only covers "indoctrination". The taxpayer-funded distribution of pro-government propoganda posters, for example, could be held to be "not indoctrination" because they do not apply any kind of force and still leave people with a choice. Herr Anderson has already made such arguments concerning his present plan (decrying "Conservative propoganda" in the process, thus displaying a bewildering lack of self-awareness).
And too far, because its second half covers any "illegal use of Government resources" - a minor government bureaucrat who mistakenly takes home a few pencils from a government storeroom could now potentially face a five-year prison sentence for "illegal use" (theft) of "Government resources" (pencils). To me, this seems a bit harsh.
I would like to suggest the following amended wording:
- All public literature, communication and broadcasts funded by public funds - or made by the civil service - must be impartial, giving no undue weight or endorsement to any political ideology or single political party.
- Anyone found to be wilfully using public funds or the civil service bureaucracy to encourage a particular political ideology or party may up to five years' imprisonment.
- (( Supporting [Ideology] National Foci are illegal from now on.))
(( No change to the in-game consequences of TJDS's proposal, just a fluff difference only. ))