• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
1863: A year of peace

Hugo Unger's first year as Chancellor had, by any conceivable measure, gone very well indeed.

yJvbQw.jpg


New naval bases began construction in Genoa and Middelburg, while capitalists throughout the country poured money into new railroads and new factories. Even domestic matters were quiet; the strict but fair policies of Minister of the Interior Maximillian von Vandenburg and the new Commander of the Gendarmerie eliminated the most dangerous separatist movements in Germany. However, some social movements continued to grow. [1]

sqkR0n.jpg


All the same, one of the strongest elements of the HUN and Chancellor Unger was his treatment of minorities. Even a bloody incident in Champagne was quickly forgiven as more and more non-Germans started to fill into German schools willingly.

Mqkeri.jpg


0f4Al1.jpg


While the world was certainly not quiet, as Poland tried to crush Tver, knowing that by international law Germany could not intervene. Although the leadership of Tver seemed to be inexperienced, they were exuberant, and they had the numbers.

VCrT84.jpg


International affairs began to shift farther south, as Egypt was welcomed among the Great Powers. Egypt wasted little time in trading upon the religious dimensions of their local relationships, effortlessly convincing the Algerian government to renounce all agreements with Germany.

m3Qib1.jpg


In Europe itself, Germany remained dominant. So dominant, in fact, that simply garrisoning Plymouth and stationing some Men 'o War there caused Britain to lose its nerve and disavow the Jamaican Republic.

9sOl8j.jpg


Among the high society of Germany, 1863 was a bittersweet year. In the spring, two of the country's most powerful families drew closer together, as the Chancellor's son Konrad Unger married the oldest of Albrecht von Hohenzollern's children (by a matter of minutes), Maria von Hohenzollern. Maria was given away by her guardian, Fritz von Hohenzollern, in a very touching ceremony. All of the surviving Hohenzollerns attended with pride: Michael, the patriarch of the family; Maria's twin sister Frederika; Albrecht's youngest child, Ferdinand, who at age 13 would soon be sent off to school; and Michael's son and heir to the family's estates and the title of Stadtholder, Konrad Friedrich. Mere months later, however, Germany experienced one of the coldest Decembers on record. A flu epidemic knifed through the capital and the rest of the Republic, claiming the lives of people great and small. Five Assemblymen lost their lives: Heinrich Wolff, Alexander Johann Linge, Christian Dumont, Domenico Bonaro and Wilhelm Braun. Retired Assemblyman DDr. Wolfram Siegfried Gotha fell ill and perished as well. Even more tragically, 16 year old Frederika von Hohenzollern was also killed; she'd always been sicklier than her older sister.

Joqe4d.jpg


But life went on. Rumblings of a new Liberal party, led by Konrad von Schwaben, started to echo around the country. A charismatic young speaker, calling himself "The Liberator", also declared for the new party. As the mood of the country's politics shifted to the left, this party could try to claim politicians who weren't happy with the existing parties. And there were always the Socialists, lurking.

[1] There's also a large "Voter Rights Movement" (that is, in favor of Secret Ballots) that's got 300k members. I'm not sure why it isn't in the screenshot.

I will now accept any and all amendments, reform proposals, or other business that concerns both houses for the next 48 hours. Do not vote until the ballot is formally announced and voting called for.
 
I am shocked and disheartened by the news from around the world. The Republic's ruthless oppression of the cause of Jamaican independence causes all our previous policies to look like a sick and demented joke. Let us pray that the noble people of Tver defeat the evil Polish imperialists and that international law is quickly changed so that our forces can intervene ((what happened there? That's so ridiculous :laugh:)).

Affairs seem to have taken a turn for the better on the domestic side since my return to the Republic. I am glad to see the backwards policy of forced assimilation in schools has ended. Let us celebrate the many cultures that make up this wonderful Republic- the most innovative and humanitarian state in the history of the world. Let us embrace our Empire of Liberty!

-the Liberator
 
After the tragic death of Herr de Spinoza last year during a duel with Herr Brunelli, I feel that it is prudent to yet again put forward a restriction on duelling. Looking back at the petition that Herr Unger put forward last year, I can only assume it didn't pass because of the heavy restrictions and penalties imposed by it. I've amended it to make it much simpler and more acceptable to the majority of the Reichstag. Thus I propose the following Duelling Restriction Act:

Duelling Restriction Act​
1. No duel may be fought to the death.
2. Firearms are forbidden to reduce the chance of accidental death.
3. The duelmaster may call off the duel at any time if he feels either of the participants is at risk of serious injury or death.
4. If a death does occur, a full investigation will be conducted to determine if it was accidental or intentional.
5. All persons found in violation of the act will be found guilty of attempted murder, or first-degree murder if a death occurs.

Hopefully this will allow those members of the Reichstag with wounded prides to restore their honour without unnecessarily shedding German blood.
 
After the tragic death of Herr de Spinoza last year during a duel with Herr Brunelli, I feel that it is prudent to yet again put forward a restriction on duelling. Looking back at the petition that Herr Unger put forward last year, I can only assume it didn't pass because of the heavy restrictions and penalties imposed by it. I've amended it to make it much simpler and more acceptable to the majority of the Reichstag. Thus I propose the following Duelling Restriction Act:


Hopefully this will allow those members of the Reichstag with wounded prides to restore their honour without unnecessarily shedding German blood.
((I was about to propose basically the same legislation :())
 
((I was about to propose basically the same legislation :())

((Well feel free to offer any suggestions for revision. I want these duelling restrictions to pass already. :D))
 
Friedrich von Hohenstaufen rises to feet on the Assembly floor.

Fellow Assemblymen, it has come to my attention that several members of the Reichstag are supporters of legislation that would restrict the rights of gentlemen to defend their honour. The very notion that such rights can be revoked is absurd! The goal of these cowards is the destruction of German society as we know it! No longer will men be able to bravely face each other in a duel, but they will have to bicker and fight like a bunch of old women! The propents of these laws are nothing more than cowardly, dishounareble effeminates who only care for their own safety! They would rather limit the rights of those with true manhood than honourably face an opponent! These wretches would turn us all to women, if they could but do it. Do not be deceived by their equivocations, do not fall victim to their rhetoric! These men are spineless traitors, and they must be stopped!
 
Friedrich von Hohenstaufen rises to feet on the Assembly floor.

Fellow Assemblymen, it has come to my attention that several members of the Reichstag are supporters of legislation that would restrict the rights of gentlemen to defend their honour. The very notion that such rights can be revoked is absurd! The goal of these cowards is the destruction of German society as we know it! No longer will men be able to bravely face each other in a duel, but they will have to bicker and fight like a bunch of old women! The propents of these laws are nothing more than cowardly, dishounareble effeminates who only care for their own safety! They would rather limit the rights of those with true manhood than honourably face an opponent! These wretches would turn us all to women, if they could but do it. Do not be deceived by their equivocations, do not fall victim to their rhetoric! These men are spineless traitors, and they must be stopped!

You seem to mistake common sense for cowardliness. Killing each other will solve nothing. I merely wish to prevent Germans from taking each other's lives while still allowing them a chance to resort to duelling in a less murderous form if they so wish. If you or others are so inclined to shed the blood of others, I'm sure the army can direct you to plenty of Frenchmen, Poles, and Brits outside our borders who more than deserve it.
 
After the tragic death of Herr de Spinoza last year during a duel with Herr Brunelli, I feel that it is prudent to yet again put forward a restriction on duelling. Looking back at the petition that Herr Unger put forward last year, I can only assume it didn't pass because of the heavy restrictions and penalties imposed by it. I've amended it to make it much simpler and more acceptable to the majority of the Reichstag. Thus I propose the following Duelling Restriction Act:
Hopefully this will allow those members of the Reichstag with wounded prides to restore their honour without unnecessarily shedding German blood.

I commend my Imperialist brethren for proposing such a liberally minded yet effective act. This act has my support.

- Ludwig Fredrik Andersen
 
I must say, I'm not sure what to make of this National Liberale Partei. The New Society stands for status quo, the HUN for status quo plus sabre-rattling, the SDAP for the Platonist worker, the DDA for the Marxist free-market ideal, the Imperialists for the monarchy, and the NLPD for... what, exactly? Some nebulous "spirit of Germany"? Dislike for the present UAI leadership? "Newness"?
 
I must say, I'm not sure what to make of this National Liberale Partei. The New Society stands for status quo, the HUN for status quo plus sabre-rattling, the SDAP for the Platonist worker, the DDA for the Marxist free-market ideal, the Imperialists for the monarchy, and the NLPD for... what, exactly? Some nebulous "spirit of Germany"? Dislike for the present UAI leadership? "Newness"?

It should be noted that the NLPD only differs in policy from my party in one way, and one way only. They advocate free and open trade while my party advocates the state management of capitalist enterprise. Though it seems some of my own party comrades have seen fit to defect over to this new party, I shall say that I shan't miss them much. In any case, the party is now going to change it's stance on Religion. We shall now support Secularized Germany, instead of one that bows to the word of God. The New Society shall recover and adapt to Die Wend, as much as we are falling behind. The NS shall not die under my watch.

- Bismarck

((In all seriousness, I don't think there's a single NS member left in this AAR but me, since Gutfreund just defected to the NLPD.))
 
Last edited:
Giuseppe Putini rises to address the assembly

Gentlemen, let us stop our bickering on dueling. We have already had bills on this matter. There are much graver threats to deal with. Tver, the nation which so many of our fighting men died for is in danger. We cannot allow our men to have died in vain. I have been told that we cannot intervene due to international law. That is rubbish! The greatest nation on this planet cannot be forced to follow arbitrary rules set by others. Still, if we cannot actually intervene, we must at least subsidize the Tverian war effort. Additionally, this recent crisis demonstrated the weakness of the British. We must continue to isolate them from allies and welcome conflict with them whenever possible.
 
((Oi! I'm technically from the NS!))
 
I see no need to patronise the Tverian war effort. The nation of Tver is already stronger than her Polish former overlords, both militarily and economically, and are repelling the Polish army without our help.

Tver is an independent nation, not a German vassal state. She has not asked for our aid on this occasion, and I do not see that it is in Tver's best interests for us to intervene. If she is to survive on the world stage, she must continue to stand on her own two feet - not learn to rely on German patronage.

And I am distressed to see how quickly some of our Reichstagsmitglieder are abandoning international law. At the end of the Tverian Liberation War, Germany entered in good faith into a five-year truce with Poland, France and Britain. How can we as a nation seriously contemplate going back on our word? In an age when individual men sooner fight to the death than bear slight against their honour, could the entire government of the Republic of Germany commit such an outrage against itself? This will not do, gentlemen.

However, I agree with Herr Putini's foreign policy regarding Britain. While I believe "welcoming conflict with them" would be neither helpful nor necessary, a policy of diplomatic isolating Britain will greatly serve the Republic's long-term interests.
 
I see no need to patronise the Tverian war effort. The nation of Tver is already stronger than her Polish former overlords, both militarily and economically, and are repelling the Polish army without our help.

Tver is an independent nation, not a German vassal state. She has not asked for our aid on this occasion, and I do not see that it is in Tver's best interests for us to intervene. If she is to survive on the world stage, she must continue to stand on her own two feet - not learn to rely on German patronage.

And I am distressed to see how quickly some of our Reichstagsmitglieder are abandoning international law. At the end of the Tverian Liberation War, Germany entered in good faith into a five-year truce with Poland, France and Britain. How can we as a nation seriously contemplate going back on our word? In an age when individual men sooner fight to the death than bear slight against their honour, could the entire government of the Republic of Germany commit such an outrage against itself? This will not do, gentlemen.

However, I agree with Herr Putini's foreign policy regarding Britain. While I believe "welcoming conflict with them" would be neither helpful nor necessary, a policy of diplomatic isolating Britain will greatly serve the Republic's long-term interests.

Poland has broken the very laws which you claim prevent us helping our Tverian allies. If Poland will not recognize Tverian sovereignty, which was a stipulation of the treaty ending the War of Tverian Liberation, then the treaty is null and void! Why cower behind women's skirts when we should be helping of allies and stopping the Polish advance?

~ Friedrich von Hohenstaufen
 
If Poland has broken international law, then hell may descend upon them. If not, we must pass this opportunity by. Germany has no need for more wars.
Albrecht von Spinoza, Statthalther of Kiel
 
Poland has broken the very laws which you claim prevent us helping our Tverian allies

Actually, strictly speaking, they didn't.

I've briefly examined the the treaty concluding the Tverian Liberation War. It describes, quite thoroughly, the mutual five-year truces between all belligerents of that conflict. However, strictly speaking, the Republic of Tver was not a belligerent in the Liberation War, since it was only recognised by the international community as a state after the armistace. And so, by quirk of legal terminology, no legal truce existed between Tver and Poland.

And while the wording of the treaty binds Poland to recognise the existence of the Republic of Tver, it has no similar terms concerning its borders. And so, under international law, Poland is quite within its rights to declare a state of war with Tver over border disputes, so long as such casus belli only threaten to diminish the state of Tver and not utterly conquer it.

I agree that Poland are going quite firmly against the spirit - if not the word - of the treaty. But if we were to declare war with Poland, we would be going against both word and spirit - and rightly bring down the condemnation of the nations as Tyrant of Europe.

But I would encourage us all to consider the Polish-Tverian war from broader perspectives than that from Nürnberg. Consider what the neutral powers see of Poland - ever the old oppressor of the Tverian people, she sets aside former agreements in order to make war against them again, trying to desperately cling to some of her former stature. And the Tverian people stand against her! Alone and triumphant, no more will they fall beneath her heels. Poland is fallen, they will say! Fallen and crushed is she from her former position as a Great Power; she cannot stand against a nation not five years old.

And with that in mind, I think the German Republic should be wary before throwing our financial or military support behind Tver. Goliath slain by David's stone is a great story; Goliath slain by David wielding a Roman ballista, not so great.
 
((Well, all of you New Society members were gone and didn't reply to my rollcall in the group... Sorry! XD))