hey there, wanted to get a few things clear. So basically, land is split between Generals (max 12 divisions) and Field Marshals (unlimited divisions).
Field marshals give a lot less bonuses, and lose all their general traits and their skill when promoted to the position, and i assume gaining skill is done very very slowly (like a theatre or army group command in HOI3). While generals start more skilled, gain skill faster, and have a wider array of traits? (More like a corps commander in hoi3 terms?)
so correct me if i make a wrong assumption here, i want to make sure i understand properly
lets say i have two high skill generals, Rommel and Guderian to pick two classic well known generals. i have a single front against an enemy nation. i promote rommel to field marshal for fanboy reasons and he loses his skill and traits, but can command the entire front with no penalty.
i then give command of 12 motorised and panzer divisions to guderian, and assign him a much much smaller battle plan which is essentially a breakthrough order, drawing a straight line right through the enemy meant to break through and follow the plains with tanks and motorised and just punch a hole and encircle the enemy. because hes only a general, he has higher skill and is giving traits like "panzer leader" and such so me giving this order to him as a separate part of a plan is effectively much better than making rommel manage it all? (as he lost traits and skill previously)
assuming that is correct, i also have a question
1) why promote anyone to field marshal, as it seems sad to lose so many traits and skill, at least if you want to be a fan boy like me and reassign guderian or rommel to full field marshal. Or any of the great generals who dont start as field marshal
2) are there higher level traits that only field marshals can access?
Field marshals give a lot less bonuses, and lose all their general traits and their skill when promoted to the position, and i assume gaining skill is done very very slowly (like a theatre or army group command in HOI3). While generals start more skilled, gain skill faster, and have a wider array of traits? (More like a corps commander in hoi3 terms?)
so correct me if i make a wrong assumption here, i want to make sure i understand properly
lets say i have two high skill generals, Rommel and Guderian to pick two classic well known generals. i have a single front against an enemy nation. i promote rommel to field marshal for fanboy reasons and he loses his skill and traits, but can command the entire front with no penalty.
i then give command of 12 motorised and panzer divisions to guderian, and assign him a much much smaller battle plan which is essentially a breakthrough order, drawing a straight line right through the enemy meant to break through and follow the plains with tanks and motorised and just punch a hole and encircle the enemy. because hes only a general, he has higher skill and is giving traits like "panzer leader" and such so me giving this order to him as a separate part of a plan is effectively much better than making rommel manage it all? (as he lost traits and skill previously)
assuming that is correct, i also have a question
1) why promote anyone to field marshal, as it seems sad to lose so many traits and skill, at least if you want to be a fan boy like me and reassign guderian or rommel to full field marshal. Or any of the great generals who dont start as field marshal
2) are there higher level traits that only field marshals can access?