Also, DG has opted to switch to a minor house for IC only, meaning a slot in the Iron Isles has opened up.
Population numbers seem high. I'm not sure, but I think an 'official' population ranking exists.
55K for a nobody like Farwynd just doesn't look right.
For the Riverlands I'd say that House Bracken would be a better placed vassal than House Mooton. If I recall correctly House Mooton were minor vassals of House Darry, whilst House Bracken was one of the powerful dynasties who constantly picked fights with the Blackwoods. (Damn straight I sympathize with the Blackwoods. Burn down Stone Hedge!)
Other than that, in the Westerlands you've misspelt Crakehall (for both the noble house, and the lands it controls) as Crakhall... A crime punishable by severe judgement!
For the Riverlands I'd say that House Bracken would be a better placed vassal than House Mooton. If I recall correctly House Mooton were minor vassals of House Darry, whilst House Bracken was one of the powerful dynasties who constantly picked fights with the Blackwoods. (Damn straight I sympathize with the Blackwoods. Burn down Stone Hedge!)
Other than that, in the Westerlands you've misspelt Crakehall (for both the noble house, and the lands it controls) as Crakhall... A crime punishable by severe judgement!
Is House Cerwyn more powerful than House Bolton? They have the same number of banners as both Manderly and Stark.
Also, House Mooton is quite powerful in this timeframe. Their influence did not wane until Robert's Rebellion, when they sided with the Targaryens over Robert Baratheon. At least thats what I gather from the Wiki.
Hm. I couldn't find anything official. Had to use their 25k army as a base, assuming they can raise 2% of their pop into an army. I can cut that back for you if you like to suit your rp.
A nation never raised 10% of their people. 2% seem like too much in my opinion, 1% would likely be closer to reality.
10% of a nation of millions would be insane, but in a warrior culture where every free adult man was theoretically supposed to be a fighter? Less so imho. This is why medieval/dark ages wars tended to have such a limited campaign season, you had too much of your workforce in the field.
I'must assuming that there is serious scholarly work out there on the issue. But to return to our original issue, the population stats as is would mean Iron Islands are crowded and urban. Using 10% would get us to a total for the whole Iron Islands population of 250k, much more reasonable imho.
10% of a nation of millions would be insane, but in a warrior culture where every free adult man was theoretically supposed to be a fighter? Less so imho. This is why medieval/dark ages wars tended to have such a limited campaign season, you had too much of your workforce in the field.
I'must assuming that there is serious scholarly work out there on the issue. But to return to our original issue, the population stats as is would mean Iron Islands are crowded and urban. Using 10% would get us to a total for the whole Iron Islands population of 250k, much more reasonable imho.
While I do agree the Ironborn is too high, quite a bit too high, then stats like that would require more custom made stat for each region, where as Bishop has preffered to go by an equation which covers all the kingdoms equally. Meaning that if we went by the Ironborn way, then the rest of Westeros would be severely lacking in population.
So, how is raiding going to work?
To add a sense of scale, Norway's population in 1000 was 150,000, while in 1300 was 400,000. This means that it would raise a total of 15k troops in 1000 and 40k in 1300 at 10%.