SoI makes me wary of the future CK2 has in store
- Thread starter Fraemi
- Start date
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
- Status
You're overreacting here. Take a deep breath, CALM DOWN. How do you know Byzantines would be unplayable? Muslims and Pagans were supposed unplayable at the start of the game release. And nobody thinks you're a troll, maybe you think everyone else thinks you are a troll.
Using epithets like Paradrone = acting like a troll = intentionally picking a fight.
People have tried to tell you that you can STILL mod the game and play as a muslim. Do you understand this fact?
If no - what part of the above statement do you not understand?
If yes - argument over.
Except the expansions for EUIII added lots of new content to the game. Paradox didn't remove Japan and Ming from day 1 and already have in mind a DLC to unlock them.
Actually CK2 was a remarkably stable release compared to others, but I agree with most of your other points. Though you could state yourself more tactfully. Resorting to insults only ruins your own arguments.
Not everything you say is incorrect, just most of it. And when you refuse to accept corrections from others and continue in your inane rants, I can't help but assume you're trolling, or at least have a hard time grasping simple logic.
They didn't do that with CKII and Muslims either. What a coincidence.
It IS changed! It may have been a big that it was possible in 1.05, but it WAS possible.
Except the "argument" isn't over, because I never said that you couldn't mod the game to play as a muslim. Do you understand that? My point was that I shouldn't have to edit game files to do something that should have been in the game at release. Paradox is turning into EA, they lock content from the beginning and plan on releasing a DLC.
Since people don't seem to comprehend any of what is being said.
First, Muslims were NEVER playable without modding.
Second, Muslims are STILL playable through modding.
Get that? You lost nothing and your pissing and moaning about nothing.
First, Muslims were NEVER playable without modding.
Second, Muslims are STILL playable through modding.
Get that? You lost nothing and your pissing and moaning about nothing.
I fail to see why I should consider the opinions of anybody who disregards a single part of my argument because another part of my argument was poorly done.
yak thinks I'm a troll. I'm sure a few others do, too.
And I'm not saying that Byzantines will be unplayable. What I'm saying is that Paradox is going to release, piece by piece, for $10 each, new "expansions" that only add a few minor things that should have been in the original, base game.
Indeed. What a shame that they focus on improving things one at a time then release them for us to play and have fun with! It's almost as if they want a better business model than what we had ten years ago!
EUIII - playing Japan and Ming was a feature from the beginning
CK2 - playing a EUROPEAN nation was a feature from the beginning - nowhere was it implied that you could play as a muslim ruler. If you didn't like that fact, why did you buy the game?
We know that. We are saying it is wrong or bad as a game release structure. You are the one who does not understand where we are coming from.
You keep saying what I'm saying is "incorrect" and "trolling", yet where is your proof? You can make as many baseless accusations as you want, but unless you actually bring up a counter point there is no reason to even respond to you anymore.
Are you complaining that you can't play as minor nations in the Total War series? How about playing in Gilneas in World of Warcraft before the Cataclysm expansion? Or playing as a common goblin in Magicka campaign? By your logic everything in the game should be playable no matter how content empty it is. And using EU3 as a precedent is completely meaningless. It is a different franchise with a different focus and mission statement. The fact that both EU3 and CK2 were made by Paradox is irrelevant. There is no clause or law anywhere that says that in Paradox games all nations have to be playable. Or would you expect to play as tertiary characters in a hypothetical Paradox point-and-click adventure game, regardless of it being a toted feature or not?
That is their RIGHT as a company. I may not like it either, but that's how businesses run! Don't buy PDox games if you don't like their business model.
Taking the high road? Being a decent person?
Calling someone a paradrone is ill form.
Please actually read and comprehend my post in response to yours. Learning a skill like that will help the next time you attempt to argue with someone.
- Status