Yes, but what exactly is the problem? Again: How do you expect anything to change if you don't at least say clearly what the problem is?
Also, to my knowlegde, almost all 'problems' come from the return province. But you can't really do without that, so simply complaining that it is 'broken' won't help.
The problem is self-evident to looking at the picture. I have an army moving into Ahmadnagar from a maintained fort, while the return province is to the north in Gujurat. It's all pictured there. I took an army from the north and moved it right past a fully maintained fort.
There are 4+ ways this move might have happened, and only some are ruled out by the visible return province. Had this army not been selected, any of the 4+ explanations would have worked for this (otherwise illegal) move.
You don't seriously expect people to remember everything you posted at some point, or dig through your post history?
And I'm sorry to say this but repeatedly saying the same things, is exactly how you get your point across. And it's easy enough. Just make one post explaining the problems and then link it whenever you want.
Of course not. But I also don't seriously expect repeating it to cause a different outcome in terms of changing than previous attempts. The devs have left in multiple objective bugs I have reported 4-5 times for years without acknowledging the threads' existence and have had plenty of exposure to complaints and alternative fort rule suggestions. No sense beating my head against the wall expecting something to actually change, but I'll still vent that this implementation is trash.
I have even had some of my threads reporting the offensive coalition war bug disappear (some date back to the previous forum layout), but no actual acknowledgement or fix for an objective bug. This is not an environment where It's reasonable to ask me to respect the process much, without some evidence that practices will change.
And that condescending tone of yours isn't really helping you either. You just keep on going on about how you understand the rules so well, and everyone else doesn't. What do you even expect to achieve that way?
No, to be specific I am pointing out that people claiming the rules "work" in some capacity don't know the rules, making the claim that the rules work awkward. I did not claim to be an expert on the rules, though I do seem to know more than most players.
I want as many people to hate on the broken fort rules as possible, maybe influencing a change indirectly. As a single random person on the internet, I don't have much power beyond that, especially when it is painfully evident that simply reporting objective/routinely encountered issues multiple times carries no guarantee or even reasonable assurance of it being addressed in the next two years.
Anyway, they can start by making the possible move rules evident from looking at the screen. The fact that there are 4+ explanations for another otherwise-illegal move and you can't even determine which is in play without directly selecting the army is by itself a serious objective flaw in any title that claims to carry the "strategy" tag.
.png){kind=avatar}
