As you say, cadet branches would not be the main feature. A late-game/Renaissance DLC could have cadet branches though, and be quiet interesting thematically. So I would not rule out it based on themes.
- 7
So it's not china.
- Thread starter klopkr
- Start date
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Seriously guys? We've already got a thread on the exact same subject. Can a moderator merge these threads?
- 2
I think there should be a rule that you can't claim "the devs said X" if you can't link to a post. 
I'm all for China, but this next one won't be China. Personally I'm hoping for a Fall of Rome/Justinian/King Arthur timeline expansion back to 480 or thereabouts.
I'm all for China, but this next one won't be China. Personally I'm hoping for a Fall of Rome/Justinian/King Arthur timeline expansion back to 480 or thereabouts.
- 5
- 4
It'd be nice if there were a new start-date. Like in between Old Gods and 1066.
Maybe also some cultural corrections (Pictish should DEFINITELY not be gone by Old Gods start).
Maybe also some cultural corrections (Pictish should DEFINITELY not be gone by Old Gods start).
- 1
.png){kind=avatar}
Just in case it was my post you refered to concerning minor extensions:I think there should be a rule that you can't claim "the devs said X" if you can't link to a post.
- 2
I'll get started on that but it'll take a little time to find them all.I think there should be a rule that you can't claim "the devs said X" if you can't link to a post.
I'm all for China, but this next one won't be China. Personally I'm hoping for a Fall of Rome/Justinian/King Arthur timeline expansion back to 480 or thereabouts.
If inland republics happen, I want government types to be fluid. Maybe you start out as a one province tribal, to ducal merchant republic, to king level inland republic, to imperial monarchy. Basically I want a government DLC. I want to see co-emperors, I want to see realms de jure controlled by a council, but de facto power is consolidated into a family. I want the rich land owners in your dying republic create the conditions that lead to feudalism. I want governments to be able to create, and maybe dominate alliances that don't require marriage. I want brothers to attempt to share empire between them, but collapse into fratricide. I want regents to go mad and lock the rightful boy king into a tower, and then watch the bastard son of the kingdom defeat the usurper and free a people he was never allowed to call his own!
With some naval battles thrown in there
With some naval battles thrown in there
- 10
I don't particularly care as long as they keep improving performance. The HL patch made late game actually playable for me so I'm happy. Personally I'd like to see more non-Catholic religious mechanics, especially for heresies, cadet dynasties, and African region.
- 2
It is my strong belief that Paradox should work 24 hour days, seven days a week to produce more content for us. They should have enough time to eat enough to not starve to death, and time every ten days to sleep for a few hours so they don't die from lack of sleep. Other than that, all their time should be to produce content for us.
I kid, of course. I love that they're still producing affordable DLC that is actually worth the money, and that even if you don't want to buy the DLC (I didn't buy horselords) there are free features added.
I kid, of course. I love that they're still producing affordable DLC that is actually worth the money, and that even if you don't want to buy the DLC (I didn't buy horselords) there are free features added.
- 5
I just hope they fix all the issues that the latest DLC introduced. I like new stuff as much as the next guy, but there's a lot of problems.
- 1
- 1
Its the link to WoL that isn't sourced. That quote refers to Res Publica and Legacy of Rome, but LoR was smaller than WoL (its also a question whether Johan had LoR's figures to hand, given it was released over 2 years ago.)
My bet is on late game content and Imperial mechanics, including coronations, more detailed Elective succession etc.
- 2
That quote refers to smaller extensions in general as this was his previous post:
With the two in mind, even if the prices have changed since release.
That's too bad, I was looking forward the indirect boost to performance adding China would have given to our mod...
- 1
I want Cadet brances. Inland Republics are fine, then one can play as the Swiss. However I won't cry if it's not Inland Republics. My hope is that it's Cadet Branches, more rp stuff, more interaction with the Church (make it so getting your cousin to become a powerful Bishop actually is useful).
- 3
I'd like to see Cadet branches too. I'd like them to be part of a DLC which focuses on the politics of the realm, though. This DLC could focus on things like relations between the King and the church and the distribution of land. I think the latter is certainly something which should be looked as at the moment it is too easy to just promote some courtier from a lowborn to a Duke and all your vassals just shrug. It would be cool if you could offer out counties/duchies out to the realm and then your vassals' second/third sons, brothers, uncles etc could offer money to you in exchange for the titles. You could also receive offers from the noble relatives of your wife à la Henry III and the Savoyards and Lusignans. Giving out high ranking titles to lowborn nobodies really should piss your vassals off.
- 2
