Should besieged provinces count for warscore?

[Adonnus]

And assuming the results of actual sieges be lowered in terms of warscore, subsequently.

So say you have their whole kingdom besieged. You have 90% warscore. You try to force surrender but "I still have untouched lands and holdings". Does this make sense?

 

[DevilSauron]

Well, the whole war diplomacy in CK2 needs big rework

 

[DraconicEpic]

Well, the whole war diplomacy in CK2 needs big rework

War diplomacy? What war diplomacy? You have three options: Unconditional Defeat, Unconditional Surrender, or Give Up. Its rare chance the AI actually accepts a White Peace when things are balance or in their favor. I can't really even call that diplomacy.

 

[DevilSauron]

War diplomacy? What war diplomacy? You have three options: Unconditional Defeat, Unconditional Surrender, or Give Up. Its rare chance the AI actually accepts a White Peace when things are balance or in their favor. I can't really even call that diplomacy.

But still, it's more moddable than EU4. I hope Paradox will eventually make the system closer to EU4, but it needs to be still same moddable.

 

[Talq]

And assuming the results of actual sieges be lowered in terms of warscore, subsequently.

So say you have their whole kingdom besieged. You have 90% warscore. You try to force surrender but "I still have untouched lands and holdings". Does this make sense?

... now that eg hired mercenaries can appear in neutral adjoining provinces. In any event, this would overpower carpet sieging.