billy bob said:
On for the PURPLE! And are you gonna use the quick fix mercenaries or a longer solution with trained troops?
I have a few mercenaries still -- I got rid of most of them -- but I'll generally avoid them because I like having long-term investments (regiments) that will stick around.
If I'm in an emergency, I'll try mercs, but I don't see an emergency yet...
Fulcrumvale said:
How large is the combined Tuscan-Venetian army as compared to your own?
Well, together, thinking back, I think they were together a little smaller than my total army. But they also had the ability to build or hire more if they wanted. I could do the same, but I likely won't. I'm more worried about the dwindling size of my navy, rather than my army. I've developed a habit of building 2-3 armies at a time, only when I need them. Mass investments in armies would have to mean that I did something very wrong, and I've left myself vulnerable. Don't think this hasn't happened before in my games (read Fire Warms!!!), but I try to keep on top of what they're doing and anticipate them.
Eams said:
Here's hoping this doesn't turn into to your game's version of the 30 Years War (Religious conflicts, rebels, and squabbling lords. All that's missing are a rising protestant power and the Holy Roman Empire deciding that it's time to implode.)
I think that kind of religious conflict is a few decades off yet. Still got plenty of "kings-of-the-hill" who are trying to knock their opponents down a notch, though (I'm one!

).
Eams -- I don't recall for sure if I've welcomed you to the story... If not,
WELCOME!
basharious said:
I just went through the whole AAR. It's great

. Time-consuming read, but well worth it. And if you don't mind me asking, how often do you update?! On a side note: Thumbs up for the Strategy Guide

.
Thanks,
Basharious! For all those comments -- and
welcome! Thanks for reading through the whole thing from start -- it's quite long, already! I've been updating about twice a day most days, but there have been stretches where I've updated 3-4 times a day. Today it's been only once -- it mostly depends on whether my laptop has internet access (which it does not when I'm at home -- we're on DSL now, but not wireless, and dialup is too much of a hassle these days).
billy bob said:
After the war build a good navy and invest in military technologies!
Yes, these are what I definitely need to work on. And I'd also like to start a building programme for workshops and other important city buildings. I'm missing alot of economic development without those, because I've been so focused on wars!
WhisperingDeath said:
A humbling experience for the Tuscans (sons of the ancient Etruscan peoples!) to have to rely on the Venetians (cowardly, swamp-dwellers). This is a tricky war. Fighting on multiple fronts is never easy; and the timing is not great. Hold fast and rely on a swift (unpredictable) offense!! Oh, btw - make peace as quickly as practicable!!
Yeah -- this is the most confused of my wars, so far. Multi-front wars make me nervous, especially when either of the powers I'm fighting has some military oomph! And it worries me that I don't think my navy will hold up against both of their navies. As a coastal power, I'm nervous if I don't control the waves!
Chief Ragusa said:
You've certainly turned the situation around with Tuscany. Again you are relying on the provinces falling before the Venetians manage to break through - again your allies ought to arrive before that happens. Your navy is making a contribution, albeit somewhat pyrrhic.
It's so far a near-run thing. I'm hoping to retain my balance as I try all these tricky moves.
ZachMayo said:
With your economic position tenuous at best before the war, I'm wondering how long your multi-front campaign (really one campaign and one strategic defense) is feasible...
Well, it's not so much that my economic situation can't support a war -- it can. It's that I'm sacrificing my long-term competitiveness, over decades -- falling behind against my neighbors because I'm busy fighting wars while they're improving their economies by building province improvements, advancing in technology, etc. I'm already about 4-5 grades behind the French in military technology, and about the same number behind the top-ranked naval powers in naval tech (including Venice!). If this continues, it's possible I may start losing wars that I would otherwise expect to win.
JimboIX said:
Just read through this whole thing, great stuff. Looks like you're finally putting the Tuscans to bed, how's Burgundy doing? Haven't heard much about them lately. Keep up the good work.
Thanks,
Jimbo &
welcome! I don't remember exactly which things happened when, but Burgundy has been quiet since their war with France, except for some low-intensity conflicts in the north -- basically against the ecclesiastical powers of the Netherlands (Utrecht disappeared) and northwest Germany (Trier, etc.).
Mr Me said:
VILenin said:
And I have to compliment you, the speed of your updating is truly dizzying! Something for all us humble authAARs to aspire towards.
Yeah... I've been kind of outdoing myself! Hope no one minds, terribly! AAR-writing is part of my gameplay, anymore -- I think what's important, snap a screenshot, and write a couple lines of text before I go on with the game. Makes it easy to cut & paste for fast updates.
Maximilliano said:
Just read through this AAR, amazing job so far, can't wait to see where you take Milan next (please say HRE throne)
Maximilliano! I've missed your comments -- great to have you back!
Welcome! HRE throne is on my list of things to do -- just give me time.
Tem_Probe said:
I will go against the commonly-held idea that a quick peace is the best option. Fight for ten years if you must. Sure - that's a risk, but you've got good allies as backup worst comes to worst, and at stakes is the mastery of Italy, which you can easily obtain if you simultaneously (or sequencially) defeat both Tuscany and Venice.
Thank you for your confidence! I tend to be of the opinion that a "complete" peace is preferable to a quick peace -- if I get what I need out of it, then I'm happy. Hopefully, "survival" doesn't qualify as what I most
need out of the war!
GhostWriter said:
what is the order if you wish to make separate peace ? ? IIRC, you have to make peace with Venice before you make peace with Tuscany because Venice is the ally brought into the war. how much help is Brandenburg giving you in this war ? ? i know that Brandenburg would be able to offer much help against Austria, but how close is Brandenburg to Venice ? ? btw, it is really good that Austria is not your ally in this war ! ! how much help is Wurttemburg at this time. do you know how many troops they have ? ?
Actually, since Venice is more powerful than Tuscany, they become the "alliance leader" which means peace with them ends the whole war. The separate peace would be with Tuscany, now. I'm not sure Brandenburg can reach these countries by land -- they're tied up with Hungary, anyway. Wurttemburg is helping by tying up Brescia -- I think they have about 4-5,000 men, unless they're busy in Denmark with more (I don't recall at this point if they were involved in the Baltic war yet).
stnylan said:
You don't even have to win against Venice at this stage - just survive. And Tuscany will fall.
Agreed -- I'll hold the Venetians back while I finish off Tuscany. Unless I see other opportunities...
PrawnStar said:
Re Ghostwriter's comment about long wars - that's definitely true about EU2, comments I've seen in the forum suggest that approach may not work so well in EU3. So are you aiming for a long war or a short war and why?
I'll have to "go with the flow" -- see what the equilibrium of war will offer. If I can turn it into a great victory through a longer war, I will. But if it looks like I will have to settle for some victory to avoid risk of a loss, then I'll do that too.
Lord E said:
Good to see that you managed to save the Pope, you did what ever true Catholic should do, also you got to go to war against some evil neighbours so it was a good reason. Maybe the times are turning in this war, it seems like Venice have started to understand that they can’t win and that this isn’t their war to fight. You should use this opportunity and crush Tuscany while the Venetians are resting!
This is largely role-playing, rather than self-interest. Self-interest would have dictated that I wait for Tuscany to annex Rome, and then take it all for myself!

And, yes -- I think you're right about the strategic situation.
metal said:
Welcome,
Metal! Thanks.
Director said:
This is no special tenderness towards the Pope, merely a 'clearing of the decks' in order to concentrate on you! Fortunately they have left it too late. Get everything you possibly can from this peace. [Profound voice] Italy... is your destiny. [/Profound voice]
I think you are right about Venice -- they're likely preparing for a second big push against me. Italy is my destiny -- I may just take my time reaching it.
coz1 said:
So you did acheive success inhelping the Pope. Now if only you can get some help from maybe the Turks taking it to Venice.
Bah! I would never accept help from a Musselman!!! What would the Pope say?
stnylan said:
So, now you have ensured Papal independence all you have to do is ensure that Tuscany will not, in future, ever act in such a manner. Vassalisation perhaps?
Perhaps!
Secret Master said:
Hmmm, I don't know whether I agree with my jingoistic colleagues. Sure, Venice and Tuscany do have it coming, but you've already taken a loan and I notice your manpower dropping steadily. Unless you already have over 50% war score, maybe its time to take a foreign policy breather and let your country rest a bit. Demand ducats, pay back your loan, and let your manpower and regiments reinforce.
You may be right. But they will have to convince me -- somehow -- that I cannot have a more substantial victory.
Petros said:
Perseverance may pay huge dividents if you stay at war against both nations - but to what cost? And what if it doesn't pay off? Is it worth the risk? I believe that it is, even if it means that you have to succumb to a peace agreement appeasing the Venetians in order to solely focus on punishing the Tuscans... And still, there is the chance that you may manage to fight both and come out victorious! Imagine the horrified looks on the faces of the French and the Austrians! That is worth the risk!
This was one of the earlier comments, but I felt it would be best to address this at the end... In contrast to
Secret Master, I think this is closer to my nature as a game-player. Through all of my games -- Victoria or EU -- I tend to be cautious to a point, but never overly so. If I think I can pull off a victory, I'll go for it. I feel this generally puts me in better control of my own situation in the long run. Once my enemies are resting from the exhaustion I've given them,
THEN I can take a breather!
Thanks everyone! Looks like probably no update until morning.
Rensslaer