Let's all bump this thread to the top until Paradox add back all the QoL things 
- 133
- 31
- 5
- 1
Then bump this thread, brother. We're starting a rebel faction with growing discontent today ;PWe all agree and It's been talked about for months, to no effect.
By Sigmar, yes!! Also, saveable character search templates! That'll save sooo much time!Oh, and saveable game rules templates.
Strictly-mongol-or-any-steppe-tribe player here (99% of the runs so far); joining the faction to bring all the available horde, with total development of 8 (in 50+ provinces).Then bump this thread, brother. We're starting a rebel faction with growing discontent today ;P
Please no, i don't want CK with just one mapmode.We need CK4!
Haha yeah, it makes zero sense to take away diplo map mode. I remember Stellaris didn't have diplo map mode at launch, either. I'm not liking this trend.Please no, i don't want CK with just one mapmode.
Haha yeah, it makes zero sense to take away diplo map mode. I remember Stellaris didn't have diplo map mode at launch, either. I'm not liking this trend.
Regardless of whether they were or weren't, does it seem wise to intentionally leave out features that make the UI easier to deal with when moving on to the next version?Were message settings park of core CK2, before any expansions? Were they added as a free feature later on? I never played the game before it had a dozen DLCs.
Of course not. I only ask because, if they were part of the core game at release (as they are not part of core CK3 at release), then the odds of them being added later on are lower. If they were a free addition to the game AFTER release, then we may still get them for CK3.Regardless of whether they were or weren't, does it seem wise to intentionally leave out features that make the UI easier to deal with when moving on to the next version?