At least there should be some options for individual countries to go out of alliance and offer peace agreement to the enemy for this. Like Finland done that when they understood that Germany losing the war. Small countries tend to do this kind of stuff when their major allies are losing, same thing would happen if England would be invaded, I think most of allied countries would seek peace agreement with Germany. It is really strange to see how small countries continue their war against major countries when their major ally is defeated.
So I totally agree that we need more peace options.
PS And I think we need more internal politics in this game. I would like to see that your success and disasters on front line would leave consequences for internal politics and population opinions. And if you have better situation it he war and big successes in you military actions then your populations should feel more motivated and this should increase production efficiency. But if you are losing the war then there should be even civil war possibilities (if you have low national unity for example).
I would really want to see more complex system with dependencies, where you should not ignore some part of the system, because if you ignore something it should impact all other stuff in your country. And countries with low national unity and happiness levels, with big military loses and low equipment stockpile should seek peace options with enemies. (but counties with low stockpile but with big national unity should fight till their death like fanatics, their productivity levels should be higher and even after their defeat those territories should have bigger dissent levels with higher partisan levels).
Right now I don't see any real reason to increase national unity or bother with internal politics, this part of the game just feels empty, you wait until you get enough points to appoint some minister or change some law for the better one and that is it, there is no challenges. It feels like I have some robots in my population that will support me and fight for me no matter what I do and how miserable their life can be and how big chances to die in the war there is, because my armies don't have enough equipment and supplies. I can send my armies to fight without equipment where they will suffer great loses and my population will not riot and my army will keep loyalty to me and this seems strange.
And if you have huge stockpile of equipment but low level of national unity then I think your armies should fight with much efficiency and their organisation levels should be smaller, because soldiers would not want to die without purpose and if nation have low unity then for soldiers main purpose will become to preserve their own lives, not to save their country and nation from the enemy.
